Search for: "American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc."
Results 1 - 15 of 15
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe:  20 results  |  100 results
19 Apr, 2007 9:42 pm by Eric
By Eric Goldman Google, Inc. v. American Blinds & Wallpaper Factory, Inc., C 03-5340 JF (N.D. Cal. April 18, 2007) ... battle enforcing those marks in the future. In this respect, the judge's ruling is a significant loss for American Blinds. Further, I haven't seen the data, but I suspect a big number ... lawsuit that, from the trademark owner's standpoint, absolutely makes no financial sense. American Blinds' legal bills for this lawsuit surely must be in the hundreds of thousands of dollars, and ...
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
1 Jul, 2007 2:01 pm by Eric
... Eric Goldman Google Inc. v. American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc., 2007 WL 1848665 (N.D. Cal. June 27, 2007) The Google ... Google to assert an unclean hands defense (because, like most keyword plaintiffs, American Blinds allegedly was bidding on competitor trademarks when it brought the lawsuit), "it will be deemed judicially established ... factor-counting, the score is already 1-0 for Google with 7 factors left (or, American Blinds has to win 5 of the 7 remaining factors). To be clear, I'm not ...
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
31 Aug, 2007 5:43 pm by Eric
By Eric Goldman Google Inc. v. American Blinds & Wallpaper Factory Inc., 5:03-cv-05340-JF (N.D. Cal. settled August 31, ... isn't paying any money to settle the dispute, and the settlement merely says that American Blinds won't sue Google so long as Google follows its current trademark ... get rid of a case that was ill-advised from the get-go. As for lessons learned from this case, I think American Blinds' complete capitulation is the latest reminder to plaintiffs that it's often irrational to bring ...
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
3 Jul, 2007 8:45 am by Richard Keenan
Case: Google Inc. v. American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc. (N.D. Cal. C.V. 03-5340 JF 4/18/07) The Short Summary: Google ... , Google cited two Second Circuit District Court opinions that relied on 1-800-Contacts v. WhenUCom, Inc., 414 F. 3d 400 (2nd Cir. 2005), in which the Second Circuit concluded a company's ... that use of the key words was a "use" under the Lanham Act. The Court examined Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Netscape Communications Corp., 354 F. 3d 1020 (9th Cir. 2004), which it ...
IP Law Observer - http://www.iplawobserver.com
4 Sep, 2007 1:41 pm by Senior Editor
... (AP) _ A home decor merchant has dropped a federal lawsuit attacking Google Inc.'s practice of connecting some online ads to trademarks, handing the Internet search leader its latest legal victory on the prickly issue. American Blind & Wallpaper Factory Inc. agreed to abandon the nearly 4-year-old case without ... on his blog. But the skirmishing over the issue isn't over yet. American Airlines, part of AMR Corp., became the latest to lash out at the practice in a trademark infringement ...
LawInfo Weblog - http://blog.lawinfo.com
2 Jul, 2007 1:16 pm
Google Inc. v. Am. Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc., 2007 WL 1848665 (N.D. Cal. June 27, 2007) In this trademark litigation, Google sought terminating, evidentiary, or monetary sanctions ... served to rebut the factual showing made by Google. Thus, the court found that the evidence demonstrated "a willful indifference on the part of American Blind with respect to fulfilling its discovery obligations in the early stages of this litigation." The court concluded that certain evidentiary and monetary ...
Tags: Summaries, Case
Electronic Discovery Law - http://www.ediscoverylaw.com/
22 Jun, 2007 11:18 am by structuredsettlements
... Google should be of interest to structured settlement industry stakeholders. Google, Inc. v. American Blinds & Wallpaper Factory, Inc., C 03-5340 JF (N.D. Cal ... they can't use the actual marks in either the headline or the body of the text ads. American Blind claims that policy amounts to trademark infringement and confuse searchers combing the ... of California, with jury selection set to start Nov. 9, 2007. Further analysis of the Google v American Blinds case can be found on Eric Goldman's blog.
Structured Settlements 4Real - http://structuredsettlements.typepad.com/structured_settlements_4r/
24 Aug, 2007 6:08 am by Michael F. Kelleher
... to challenge Google for selling trademarks as sponsored search terms. In a complaint filed on August 16, 2007 in the Northern District of Texas in Fort Worth, American Airlines claims that Google infringes and dilutes the AMERICAN AIRLINES marks by ... (10/20/06)) California District Court Holds That Google's Sale of Trademarked Terms In Its AdWords Program is a Use in Commerce for Purposes of the Lanham Act (Google Inc. v. American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc. (N.D. Cal. C.V. 03-5340 JF 4/18/ ...
IP Law Observer - http://www.iplawobserver.com
14 May, 2007 11:00 am by Doug Isenberg
A U.S. judge ordered Google to face a jury trial in a trademark infringement suit that targets the workings of the Web search leader's main source of revenue. American Blind & Wallpaper Factory Inc., the top U.S. reseller of window blinds, charged in its lawsuit, originally filed in 2003, that Google abuses trademarks by allowing rivals of a company to buy ads that appear when consumers search the Web for information on that business. Read the article: Reuters
GigaLaw.com Daily News - http://www.gigalaw.com/news/index.html
14 Nov, 2007 1:47 am by Rob Robinson
... to preserve, and (ii) unless a demand letter is specific regarding the possibility of litigation, a court might refuse to find that receipt of such a letter triggered an obligation to preserve. Google Inc. v. American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc., 2007 WL 1848665 (N.D. Cal. June 27, 2007); Cache La Poudre Feeds, LLC. V. Land O'Lakes, Inc., 2007 WL 684001 (D. Colo. Mar. 2, 2007). The decisions by Magistrate Judges Seeborg and Shaffer in Google and Cache, ...
Information Governance Engagement Area - http://infogovernance.blogspot.com
16 Oct, 2006 5:53 pm
... a trademark as a search term was a trademark infringement use, citing Geico v. Google, 330 F. Supp. 2d 700 (E.D. Va 2004), Edina Realty, Inc. v. MLSonline.com, 2006 WL 737064 (D. Minn. March 20, 2006) and Google v. American Blind and Wallpaper Factory, Inc. 2005 WL 832398 (N.D. Cal. March 30, 2005) and other decisions. Citing 1-800 Contacts v. WhenU.com, 414 F. 3d 400 (2d Circuit 2005), the district court held that use ...
IP Law Observer - http://www.iplawobserver.com
28 Apr, 2007 6:00 am by TRBRS
A search engine's sale of a trademark term as an advertising keyword to a competitor of the trademark owner constitutes actionable trademark use under the Lanham Act. Google, Inc. v. American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc., No. C 03-5340 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2007). The court denied the search engine's motion for summary judgment on the trademark use issue, rejecting the search engine's argument that there was no trademark use because there was no evidence that the search ...
Technology Law Update - http://brownraysman.typepad.com/technology_law_update/
1 Oct, 2007 11:31 pm by David Chen
... suit against Google for trademark infringement, including GEICO, American Blinds and Wallpaper Factory, and most recently, American Airlines. [9] Trademark owners brought additional suits ... . Prof. Goldman pointed out that "GEICO is a pretty well-known brand, but American Airlines is one of those highest-echelon brands, one of the brands that almost everyone is ... [10] Google Inc., Quarterly Report (Form 10-Q), at 12 (June 30, 2007). [11] Id. [12] Linda Rosencrance, American Blinds drops trademark ...
The Journal of the Business Law Society - http://www.law.uiuc.edu/bljournal/
5 Sep, 2007 1:20 am
... After four years of locking horns with Google in court, Michigan-based American Blind and Wallpaper Factory has abandoned its unique trademark infringement case against the Silicon ... Law Journal The New York Board of Law Examiners and Software Secure Inc., the company the board hired to provide software for the bar exam, appear to have incomplete ... , San Francisco, CA 94102 (800) 903-9872. ALM Privacy Policy / Contact Us © 2007 ALM Properties, Inc. All rights reserved. This is a commercial email.
New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library Blog - http://www.bloglines.com/blog/PLL
17 Jul, 2007 4:03 am
... it has instituted legal proceedings in the Federal Court, Sydney, against Trading Post Australia Pty Ltd, Google Inc, Google Ireland Limited and Google Australia Pty Ltd alleging misleading and deceptive conduct in relation to ... company of running links to counterfeit goods alongside legitimate results. A US home furniture company, American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, is currently embroiled in a legal battle with Google alleging searches for the company brought up sponsored links brought by ...
IT Law in Ireland - http://www.tjmcintyre.com
         
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck