Search for: "Auto Owners Insurance Co."
Results 1 - 20 of 128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
5 Oct, 2008 10:35 pm
... DATE RENDERED: 8/1/2008 The tort victim's underinsured motorist carrier, Auto Owners
Insurance Co., appeals from an order of the Jefferson Circuit Court determining that ... Indemnity Company, for funds advanced to the
tort victim pursuant to Coots v. Allstate Insurance Company, 853 S.W.2d 895 (Ky. 1993). In this motor vehicle ... s liability carrier and still
retain a claim against his or her UIM insurer. Under the Coots procedure, when the injured party, the tortfeasor and the tortfeasor's liability ...
16 Sep 12:04 pm
... be left alone. Therefore, the question in this case is whether the "advertising injury" coverage in the CGL policy requires Auto-Owners to defend Websolv in a suit claiming an infringement of Gortho's seclusion interests. Id. at ... whether
there was ambiguity or even multiple reasonable interpretations requiring construction of the term "publication" against the insurer. It found, instead, that only one potential
meaning was pertinent. The other subsections of the definition of "advertising injury ...
10 Mar 10:53 am
Auto Owners Insurance Co. v. Newman, a 2008 case in
the South Carolina Court of Appeals, involved a commercial general liability (CGL) insurance policy issued to a contractor. The subcontractor
in the case ... standard Insurance Services Office (ISO) form. The policy covered injury or damage from an occurrence - an accident or
continuous exposure. Because the insurer did not define the term "accident", the court said it was an unexpected happening that harmed a person without that person intending ...
17 Jun 7:27 am
... June 16, 2009, in Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v Martin, No. 281482, the Court of Appeals issued a
per curiam opinion finding that the full $1 million policy ... so, the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court's ruling that the garage liability insurer's primary liability
was limited to $20,000. This ruling results from a declaratory judgment ... financial responsibility law; and that if there was no such other insurance, the Auto-Owners policy would not pay more than the the limits
required by the applicable ...
10 Sep 1:49 pm
... could bring, and interviewed me as an expert. I believe if McCormick prevails, auto accident victims who have had their rights ravaged by
Kriener for the past four ... time In this case, Rodney McCormick was injured in 2005 while he was working in Flint. A co-worker backed a truck over his ankle. McCormick's ankle
was badly ... names associated with what he calls the "victims of the Kreiner decision - Benefiel [v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company], Plaggemeyer [v. Lee], Gagne [v. Schulte]. These are real ...
8 Jan 7:29 am
In Pozzi Window Co. v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co., No. 05-10559 (11th Cir. Sept. 26, 2008),
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the judgment against an insurer, finding that the general contractor's ... outcome-determinative, factual issue were
conflicting, the court returned the case to the Eleventh Circuit. On remand, the Pozzi court found the insurer had waived any argument that the windows were originally defective
by not raising that issue on appeal. ...
14 Dec, 2007 2:24 am
In Bolan v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co., (Mich. App. Dec. 11, 2007), insureds made claim for
coverage under a homeowner's policy when they discovered softening in the floor around their dishwasher caused by a dishwasher leak during the ... from within a ... domestic appliance
which occurs over a period of weeks, months or years." Court held that while the insureds could recover for loss caused by water escaping from a domestic appliance under the
exception to the exclusion, the claim ...
12 Apr, 2008 4:38 pm
... Prejudgment Interest on Unpaid Fees • Ultra Coachbuilders, Inc. v. General Security Ins. Co., 229 F. Supp. 2d 284, 289 (S.D.N.Y ... determine whether the settlement was made
in reasonable anticipation of personal liability. Where the exposure faced by an insured is sufficient to justify the amount paid in settlement, the payment is presumptively
reasonable, irrespective of whether ... 59 Ohio Jurisprudence 3d (1985) 61, Insurance, Section 1030. • Ferrando v. Auto-Owners Mut. Ins. Co., 781 N.e.2d 927, 947 ...
19 Aug, 2007 6:00 am
... California-based Computer Sciences Corp., calculates the cost of treating people injured in auto accidents, including the degree of pain
and suffering they'll endure and ... prepared a report on the Gulfport, Mississippi, home of Hubert and Joyce Smith for Meritplan Insurance
Co. The engineer found that both wind and water had damaged the house ... didn't respond to requests for an interview. Bo Chessor, owner of Royal Construction, says he
sees insurers refusing to pay coverage limits all the time. "Most ...
19 Aug, 2007 6:00 am
... California-based Computer Sciences Corp., calculates the cost of treating people injured in auto accidents, including the degree of pain
and suffering they'll endure and ... prepared a report on the Gulfport, Mississippi, home of Hubert and Joyce Smith for Meritplan Insurance
Co. The engineer found that both wind and water had damaged the house ... didn't respond to requests for an interview. Bo Chessor, owner of Royal Construction, says he
sees insurers refusing to pay coverage limits all the time. "Most ...
19 Aug, 2007 1:00 pm
... California-based Computer Sciences Corp., calculates the cost of treating people injured in auto accidents, including the degree of pain
and suffering they'll endure and ... prepared a report on the Gulfport, Mississippi, home of Hubert and Joyce Smith for Meritplan Insurance
Co. The engineer found that both wind and water had damaged the house ... didn't respond to requests for an interview. Bo Chessor, owner of Royal Construction, says he
sees insurers refusing to pay coverage limits all the time. "Most ...
3 Oct, 2008 8:12 am
... York Civil Practice Law and Rules. Watch for more developments as auto liability insurers foil with radiology facilities over the
costs of reproducing MRIs for personal injury ( ... York to an independently owned and operated livery cab owner that resides in New Jersey or Connecticut. However, the
Insurance Department's Office of General Counsel ("OGC") will not ... 2008) Punitive damages are uninsurable in New York. Hartford Accid. &
Indem. Co. v. Village of Hempstead, 48 N.Y.2d 218 (1979); Home ...
15 Nov 7:49 am
... decision is a setback for a class of injured motorists who claimed that MAMSI Life & Health Insurance Co. had an obligation to
make good on policies requiring it to pay medical expenses, ... Maryland student. On April 5, 2007, the circuit court certified as a class all owners of MAMSI health plans since Sept. 23, 2001, who had a car accident ... company. Writing for the high court, Judge Clayton Greene Jr. said Maryland
health insurance law holds that PIP insurance is primary but permits other health ...
28 Jan, 2007 6:27 am
... right. What she didn't know was that in 1997, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. had determined that the car was totaled and
sold it at auction without disclosing ... attorneys general of every state but Indiana reached a settlement with State Farm. So far, the insurer has paid $41 million to nearly
17,000 vehicle ... than the 49 other states negotiated. State Farm bought vehicles from Indiana owners who wanted to turn them in, paying the
book value at the time the consumer purchased it, the cost ...
21 Nov 8:30 pm
... 720-730 Fort Washington Ave. Owners Corp. v. Utica First Ins. Co., - N.Y.S.2d --, 2009 WL 3645656 (N.Y.Sup. 2009), an
insurance policy was purchased to protect against injuries sustained by workers injured during roofing work. Somehow, ... policy as being
"misleading" and "worthless". He noted that the lack of a prohibition against construction site insurance policies from containing exclusions
of the type involved in the case, coupled with the fact that many construction companies have no ...
28 Feb 9:01 am
... meets certain minimum limits. (There are several other ways than obtaining auto insurance to
satisfy the financial responsibility law-for example, filing a bond with the Department of Motor ... damage. You may even want to consider increasing your bodily injury insurance protection to $250,000 per person and $500,000 per accident. ... operator buys a car, the operator must purchase an owner's insurance policy before the expiration of ten days from the date of purchase. If a peace officer pulls you ...
28 Dec, 2008 11:38 pm
... ]ny relative of [the named insured] who resides in your household * * * when using a nonowned auto provided that * * * [t]he
relative is using the nonowned auto with the owner's permission and ... 's order granting summary judgment to ELRAC, the Second
Department found that the nonowned auto provision of GE's policy did not afford liability coverage for the accident: ... risk without the
payment of additional premiums'" (Sperling v Great Am. Indem. Co., 7 NY2d 442, 448, quoting Vern v Merchants Mut. Cas ...
17 Dec, 2008 9:21 am
... (Sup. Ct., New York Co., decided 12/5/2008) If a primary insurer manipulates the defense of its two named insureds -- an owner under a $1 million ...
supra). As the Court of Appeals has made clear, "a potential conflict of interest arises where the insurer that issued both policies seeks indemnification against [one of the
parties to which it issued a ... equal footing with its own interests (see Pavia v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 82 NY2d 445, 453
[1993]). The complaint and the moving affidavits ...
5 Oct 4:58 am
... . v. Avila (2nd Dept., decided 9/29/2009) Many personal auto policies exclude liability coverage for the ownership, maintenance or use of a
vehicle in "any race, ... and the decedent's estate sued all three vehicles' drivers and owners. MIC disclaimed coverage to the Avilas based
upon a policy provision that excluded liability for ... 89 NY2d 293, 298). Any ambiguity in the exclusion is to be construed against the insurer (see Allstate Ins. Co. v
Noorhassan, 158 AD2d 638, 639). "The test for ambiguity ...
11 Jun, 2008 7:28 am
... of ownership of a motor vehicle creates a "very strong presumption" that the driver was using the vehicle with the owner's permission, express or implied, and this
presumption continues "unless and until ... policy, which stated that "[f]or any covered auto' you own, this Coverage Form provides primary
insurance", was co-primary, rejecting Lumbermens argument and the lower ... Aug 15, 2007] [applying New York law]; but see Connecticut
Indem. Co. v. Hines, 40 AD3d 903 [2d Dept 2007]). If the exclusion ...
Search on: Blawgs.FM | BlawgSearch Google Co-op |
Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blog Search |
Technorati | Google | MSN | Yahoo!