Search for: "Azoogle.Com, Inc."
Results 1 - 6 of 6
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
24 Nov 6:05 pm
... By Eric Goldman Dazzlesmile, LLC v. Epic Advertising, Inc., 2:09-cv-01043-PMW (D. Utah complaint filed Nov. 23, 2009) Dazzlesmile sells ... "CPA fraud" by placing thousands
of orders, coincidentally generating over $100k of commissions to Azoogle in one week. Dazzlesmile also complains that its products were being promoted by spam, fake ... a little
hard to believe. You kind of know what to expect when you're dealing with Azoogle, and I'd be surprised if Dazzlesmile is a fully innocent naïf. Competitor ...
9 Nov, 2007 8:29 am
The Florida Attorney General unveiled its new CyberFraud Task Force by announcing a $1 million settlement with internet marketer Azoogle (Azoogleads US Inc.). According to
the AG, consumers that responded to Azoogle offers for free ringtones were enrolled in subscription plans without their knowledge or consent. In addition to the $1 million, the
settlement requires Azoogle to clearly and conspicuously disclose the cost of all ringtones.
8 Aug, 2008 4:04 pm
... May 1, 2008). In another lawsuit, ASIS Internet Services, v. Optin Global, Inc., 2008 WL 1902217 (N.D. Cal. March 27, 2008; unsealed April ... this subject is that Seamless
Media had a good reputation at the time, and was obliged by its contract with Azoogle to follow the law. Adware Another recent affiliate liability decision is the remarkable
ruling in ... the principal be charged with the conduct of even more remote subcontractors (People v. Synergy6, Inc., Index No 404027/03 [Sup Ct N.Y. Co 2006][ ...
21 Dec, 2008 7:57 am
... lacked sufficient evidence to take the underlying violations to a jury [link]. This judgment is currently on appeal. Azoogle filed for costs (not including attorney's fees)
which were roughly $ ... off its stuff). The court then turns to the issue of propriety of costs. First it determines that Azoogle is entitled to costs under CAN-SPAM. Under the
Federal Rules, a prevailing party ... probably in excess of $150,000. [Asis Internet Services v. Optin Global, Inc., N.D. Cal. Case No. C-05-5124 (Dec. 17, ...
20 Apr 11:14 am
... proceeded pro se is sort of interesting (lawyers were involved, but withdrew at some point). Are lawyers getting less excited about CAN-SPAM claims? (NB: as a counterpoint to this,
I noticed that Hypertouch (early spam litigation pioneer) is represented by Steptoe & Johnson in its suit against Azoogle: Hypertouch, Inc. v. Azoogle.com,
Inc., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25999 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 19, 2009).)
8 Apr 10:38 am
... blog has covered in the past, but they're still worth a quick note. Ferron v. Subscriberbase Holdings, Inc (excellent coverage, and a link to the decision, at spamnotes.com)
This case manages to come out just right in its results, even though ... think CAN SPAM had been specifically drafted to pointedly protect state consumer protection acts from preemption
or something...] Hypertouch v. Azoogle.com, 2009 WL 734674 (N.D.Cal.) While this order granting motions to dismiss and granting leave to amend ...
Search on: Blawgs.FM | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blog Search | Technorati | Google | MSN | Yahoo!