Blawg Search - Law Blogs, Lawyer Blogs, Legal Blogs Directory & Search Engine

... August 1999 to treat illnesses related to smoking. The lawsuit named as defendants Philip Morris USA, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., both individually and as the successors to the American Tobacco Co., Lorillard Tobacco Co. and Liggett Group Inc. In a hearing in June, the companies asked U.S. District Judge Richard G. Stearns to dismiss the lawsuit, saying they had not been found liable for the medical bills and ...

The New York State Court of Appeals issued an opinion today reversing a $20.5 million judgment against Brown & Williamson and Philip Morris. The judgment included $17.1 in punitive damages. The plaintiffs claimed that the defendants' cigarettes were ... , or try to prove, that light cigarettes perform this function as well as regular cigarettes. This opinion comes on the heels of a decision earlier today reversing a $20 million punitive damages award against Brown & Williamson in Missouri.

... the FCLAA." Id., at 19-20. The First Circuit concluded at page 23 that the FCLAA does not preempt claims that tobacco companies made false representations in advertising or promoting cigarettes. It also rejected the district court's view that the class action did not ... Lights," id., at 32-33. The Circuit Court recognized that its conclusion was contrary to the decision reached by the Fifth Circuit in Brown v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 479 F.3d 383 (5th Cir. 2007), see Good, at 33-38, ...

/**/ U.S. Supreme Court Affirms First Circuit Decision Reinstating Class Action Against Tobacco Companies Holding District Court Erred in Dismissing Class Action Challenging Advertising of "Light" ... of "light" and "low tar" descriptors was expressly preempted by the FCLAA. See Brown v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 479 F.3d 383 (5th Cir. 2007). The ... Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., 505 U.S. 504 (1992) and Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Reilly, 533 U.S. 525 (2001). Id. The First Circuit reversed, ...

... leaks from a chemical factory; non-adherence to flight safety standards by an airline; creative accounting and false declarations by a company; cheating and plagiarism in scientific research, for example - the overriding public interest may lie in protecting the public's right ... information.' * Jeffrey Wigand is the one-time head of R&D of America's third largest tobacco company, Brown & Williamson. In a 1995 interview to "60 minutes," he spoke about the company's knowledge of nicotine's ...

... USA, Lorillard and Reynolds American Inc., allowing them to further monopolize the tobacco market under the guise of federal regulation. II. Background: The Family Smoking Prevention ... smoking cessation among teenagers, or in challenging the long-standing, monopolistic power that Big Tobacco companies have enjoyed before the enactment of the Act. The ban on cigarettes with certain "characterizing ... S.C. § 301 et seq. (1938). [4] FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120 (2000). [5] Id ...

... in the past and said changes in how cigarettes are sold now make it impossible for them to act fraudulently in the future. The companies have argued the ban on labels like "light" would cost them hundreds of millions of dollars. ... were defendants in the lawsuit were: R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.; Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.; British American Tobacco Ltd.; Lorillard Tobacco Co. and Liggett Group Inc. Liggett was excluded from the ruling because the judge said the company came forward in the ...

... that report: Now that the use of cartoon characters to sell cigarettes has been prohibited, major tobacco companies have devised a new way to target our children: selling cigarettes and tobacco products in assorted candy flavors. R.J. Reynolds manufactured a pineapple and coconut-flavored ... 2004 and has an ongoing line of flavored cigarettes called Camel Exotic Blends. Brown & Williamson also introduced flavored versions of its Kool menthol cigarette in 2004 with names like ...

... District Court for the Eastern District of New York certified a class action against Philip Morris USA, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Lorillard Tobacco Co., Ligget Group, American Tobacco Co., Altria Group, and British American Tobacco; the underlying class action complaint alleged the tobacco companies duped smokers into believing that "light" cigarettes were less harmful to them. <i>See Schwab v. ...

... the standard that is used to adjudicate predatory selling schemes. That standard is found in Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. Under Brooke Group, petitioner urged, a plaintiff should have to show that the ... . Breyer suggested that the court should look to whether this stockpiling resulted in losses, which could serve as evidence that a company is one of the goats rather than sheep. Respondent rejected this approach, explaining that in an inelastic market such as the log ...