Search for: "Candela Corporation"
Results 1 - 5 of 5
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
7 Oct, 2008 11:44 pm
The following is excerpted from an October 7, 2008 Candela press release appearing at BusinessWire: Candela Corporation (NASDAQ: CLZR) today announced the jury in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Texas - Lufkin Division ruled in favor of Palomar in a patent infringement lawsuit brought by Candela against Palomar Medical Technologies,
Inc. (NASDAQ: PMTI) in December 2006. The jury ruled that Palomar did not infringe upon Candela's 5,810 ...
13 Aug, 2008 3:03 pm
The following is excerpted from an August 7, 2008 Candela press release available at Business Wire: Candela Corporation (NASDAQ: CLZR), a global leader in the development and commercialization of advanced aesthetic
laser and light-based systems, announced ... United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division issued the Markman ruling on August 6, 2008 in
Candela's patent lawsuit against Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: PMTI). In a Markman ruling, a district ...
17 Feb, 2008 6:29 am
... ). The first summary involves a discovery matter relating to a patent lawsuit filed in the E.D. Texas. #8: Candela Corporation v. Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc., No. 8:2008cv00268, filed January 31, 2008; assigned to J. ... accused devices should be operated for
wrinkle treatment. That type of evidence is classic inducement evidence that patentees typically seek. Candela's motion recognizes a number of
privacy issues involved in seeking production of medical-related documents from physicians in ...
13 Oct, 2008 12:12 pm
... against Motorola over semiconductor patents (Law360) Direction and control of suppliers sufficient for direct infringement: Rowe International Corporation v Ecast, Inc (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) Dormant infringement accusation creates declaratory jurisdiction: Tuthill ... -Gobain infringed patent
covering medical imaging technology (Law360) Jury finds no infringement and partial invalidity of Candela's patent relating to laser and
pulsed-light skin treatment in suit against Palomar (Philip Brooks' ...
10 Sep, 2008 10:29 pm
Candela v. Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc., 9:06cv277 (E.D. Tex. 2008) Judge: Ron Clark Holding: Motions for Summary Judgment DENIED
(mostly) Judge Clark's trial management order I posted on ... of marking was denied. Despite plaintiff's failure to produce a copy of the patent label for its products, "e-mails which
show a general corporate policy of marking products with patent numbers" was sufficient to create a fact issue as to whether plaintiff marked its products with the patent number
of ...
Search on: Blawgs.FM | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blog Search | Technorati | Google | MSN | Yahoo!