Search for: "Capitol Records LLC"
Results 1 - 20 of 37
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
10 Jun 6:51 am
... Records Inc, Sony BMG Music Entertainment, Capitol Records, Inc, Interscope Records, Arista Records LLC, 310 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Jammie Thomas-Rasset, 283 MOTION in Limine to Preclude Fair Use Defense filed by UMG
Recordings, Inc, Warner Bros Records Inc, Sony BMG Music Entertainment, ... MOTION in Limine to Preclude Defendant from Asserting an
Innocent Infringement Defense at Trial filed by UMG Recordings, Inc, Warner Bros Records Inc, Sony BMG Music Entertainment, ...
15 Apr, 2008 9:14 am
... Judge Bernard Zimmerman Cause: 17:501 Copyright Infringement Filed: March 27, 2008 Capitol Records, Inc. et al v. Doe Assigned to: Magistrate Judge Wayne D. Brazil ... C. Spero Cause: 17:501 Copyright Infringement Filed: March 27, 2008 Atlantic
Recording Corporation et al v. John Doe Assigned to: Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman Cause: ... D. Laporte Cause: 17:501 Copyright Infringement Filed: March 27, 2008 Laface
Records LLC et al v. John Doe Assigned to: Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman Cause: ...
30 Apr, 2008 1:12 pm
... defending her suit over a two-year period. Plaintiffs Atlantic Recording Corp., Priority Records LLC, Capitol Records Inc., UMG Recordings Inc., and BMG Music
accused Tanya Andersen of sharing more than 1,000 music files from her computer via the peer-to-per file ... any copyrights and attempted to depose Andersen's 10-year-old daughter.
Eventually, the record companies stipulated to a dismissal of the case with prejudice. Andersen thereafter moved to recover attorney's fees. ...
4 Oct, 2008 7:10 pm
In a case we have not covered before, Capitol Records v. MP3Tunes, the corporate defendant MP3Tunes,
and the individual defendant, Michael Robertson, moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, saying the action belonged in California. The Court dismissed as to Mr. Robertson, but denied
the motion as to MP3Tunes. MP3Tunes operates the web sites mp3tunes.com and sideload.com It appears that all of the plaintiffs are affiliates of EMI. -->Complaint ...
5 Oct 8:50 pm
... no foul. The thinking is: Why trigger breach notification requirements if, for example, an employee of a health care facility inadvertently accessed a patient record that he
shouldn't have, where he immediately realized his error and closed the computer file without reading it or retaining any ... in the comments.) What do you think? Is the standard too
squishy? Should the regs be pulled back to reflect the avowed legislative intent? David Harlow The Harlow Group LLC Health Care Law and
Consulting
13 May, 2008 6:53 am
... the defendants' lawyers. Certainly, if Capitol Records, Inc. has assigned its copyrights to a new
entity named Capitol Records, LLC, we are entitled to know
about it, and the plaintiffs would have to make a motion to amend the caption of the case, and provide discovery about the assignments of copyrights. There are other changes involving
(a) the parent company for Capitol, (b) Virgin, (c) SONY BMG, and (d) Arista. Any thoughts? -R.B. Original Rule 7.1 Statement* ...
10 May 7:42 am
... out there who want to help me with this project, please email me. Thanks): Arista Records LLC et
al v. Doe 1 et al SD Iowa 3:08-cv-00115-JEG-CFB Arista Records v Does 1-6 SD Ohio 2:08-cv-00874-JDH ... Records v. Does 1-8 ND Illinois 1:08-cv-05315 Capitol Records v Does 1-48
ED New York 1:08-cv ... 1-51 D.D.C. 1:08-cv-01569-CKK Motown Record Co v Does 1-2 ND Florida 1:08-cv- ... The above is just a sample. Then I started looking at October. I quickly
found: Capitol Records, LLC, et al v. Does 1-4 D Kansas 6:
...
26 Feb 5:45 am
... violated New York unfair competition law by commercially exploiting their pre-1972 recordings. While EMI didn't file claims against investors in SeeqPod and Favtape, ...
infringing conduct described herein is know. EMI may be waiting to see whether UMG Recordings, Inc. refiles claims against Veoh's investors in an amended compliant, and if ... ,
before they decide whether to file suit against SeeqPod's investors. Capitol Records, L.L.C. et al v.
Seeqpod, Inc. et al, 09 cv 01584 LTS (S.D.N.Y. Feb 20, ...
10 May, 2008 3:10 am
... LP, Premise Media Distribution LP, and Rocky Mountain Pictures misappropriated the composition in violation of the Copyright Act, the Lanham Act, and New York state law. On the same
date, EMI Records Ltd. and Capitol Records LLC filed suit against the same defendants in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, alleging violation of their rights in the sound recording
under New York state law. Premise Media contends it has the right to use the song under the ...
5 Jun 1:04 am
... this relief absent a pretty compelling evidentary showing. You really have to come in armed with affidavits from likely witnesses demonstrating that their testimony will be
essential, and establishing that travel will work a substantial hardship. Judge Baer's opinion in Capitol Records, LLC v. VideoEgg Inc. drives this home: the court "should... assess the materiality, nature and quality of
the testimony that the witnesses are ...
18 Jan, 2008 3:01 am
... /07 closed 07/11/07 1:07-cv-02278 Priority Records LLC et al v. Hickman filed 04/24/07 closed ...
cv-02315 Elexa Consumer Products Inc. v. Creative Concepts International LLC filed 04/26/07 closed 07/18/07 1:07 ... v. Bolon filed 07/10/07
1:07-cv-03864 Capitol Records, Inc. et al v. Maciejewska filed 07/10/07 ... Does filed 08/09/07
1:07-cv-04486 Arista Records LLC et al v. Does 1-9 filed 08/09 ... 07055 American Mortgage
Consultants Inc., v. Opus Capital Markets Consultants, LLC et al filed 12/14/07 1:07-cv-07288 ...
23 Jan, 2007 4:02 pm
... fees In some cases where the RIAA discontinued the case, the defendant has sought attorneys fees. In Priority Records v. Chan and Elektra
v. Perez the defendant's motion was denied. In Capitol Records v. Foster, the motion was granted. Ms.
Foster was awarded $68,685.23. The ... the record company plaintiffs, Safenet (MediaSentry), and Settlement Support Center, LLC. For a
printer-ready version of this article go to [info.riaalawsuits.us] Commentary and discussion: Global Toad News ...
5 Sep, 2007 2:31 am
... of Arkansas was chosen as the forum for litigating the following case(s), as published by Justia: Arista Records LLC et al v. Does (pdf), Case Number: 4:2007cv00782, ... , Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court Arista Records
LLC, Atlantic Recording Corporation, BMG Music, Capitol Records Inc, Elektra Entertainment Group, Inc., EMI Christian Music Group Inc, Interscope Records, Lava
Records LLC, Sony BMG Music Entertainment, UMG Recordings Inc, Virgin Records America, Inc., Warner Brothers Records, ...
2 Oct, 2007 3:52 pm
... the Eastern or Western District of Arkansas was chosen as the forum for litigating the following case(s), as published by Justia: Virgin Records America Inc et al v. Does, Case Number 4:2007cv00863, Filed: September 20, 2007, Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court Virgin Records America Inc, Atlantic Recording Corporation, BMG Music, Capitol Records Inc, Elektra Entertainment Group Inc, Interscope Records, LaFace Records LLC, Motown Record Company LP, Priority Records
LLC, Sony ...
11 Nov, 2007 2:00 am
... 131 telecoms and technology companies, including Microsoft and Yahoo! Technology Patents LLC v. Deutsche Telekom AG et al, No.
8:2007cv03012, filed Nov ... Thaler and Lars Liebeler of Thaler Liebeler filed the complaint on behalf of the Plaintiff. Maverick Recording Company et al v. DOES 1-11, No.
1:2007cv03020, ... alleged copyright infringement. Plaintiffs are Maverick Recording Company, Arista Records LLC, Atlantic Recording Corporation, BMG Music, Capitol Records,
Inc., Elektra Entertainment Group, ...
16 Oct 10:52 am
Capitol Records, Inc. v. MP3tunes, LLC, 2009 WL 2568431
(S.D.N.Y. Aug. 13, 2009) During the course of discovery in this copyright infringement case, ... ' legitimate concerns regarding privilege, though, the court determined that no parties
would be required to record any privileged documents created after the relevant action was filed on their respective privilege logs. The ... the requesting party had made…" W.E.
Aubuchon Co., Inc. v. BeneFirst, LLC, 245 F.R.D. 38 (D. Mass. 2007). The court noted the ...
23 Aug, 2008 1:23 am
... -' activities that conflict with his other ventures: (IPKat), Cricket media fetch new record prices: (IP finance), Isabella Barwinska ordered to pay £16,000 in damages and
... its user of a John Lennon clip is unlikely to violate copyright held by EMI and Capitol Records:
(Public Knowledge), (Out-Law), (Law360), EpicRealm - Motion for summary judgment of ... strike expert declaration granted: EpicRealm Licensing LP and Parallel Networks LLC v Autoflex Leasing, Inc et al: (EDTexweblog.com), Fiji Water Co ...
22 Jun, 2008 1:10 pm
... Entertainment Group, Inc., Sony BMG Music Entertainment, Virgin Records America, Inc., Capitol
Records, Inc., Interscope Records, BMG Music, UMG Recordings, Inc., Arista Records LLC. Present were Katheryn Coggon and Michael Zito, counsel ... according to the local rules. Court finds
there is no prejudice in doing so as all of counsels briefs are contained in the record. Court allows a sixty day extension of time for service on the defendants in this matter.
Court hears argument on the motion for ...
25 Sep, 2007 10:26 am
... In Estate of William Garey v. Larry E. Geswein and South Capitol Properties, LLC (NFP), a 12-page
opinion, Judge Crone writes: The Estate of William ... in making a real estate contract with Larry E. Geswein and South Capitol Properties,
LLC (collectively, "Geswein"). We reverse and remand. Issue. The dispositive issue ... West (NFP) - appeal of a decision of the small claims
court, reversed. "Our review of the record reveals no basis for the judgment of $3230 in favor of Vest. At the time Fifth Third ...
8 Apr 1:43 pm
... the answer is no; as a matter of policy, I expect the Supreme Court will say yes. * MDY Industries, LLC v. Blizzard Entertainment, Inc.,
2009 WL 223631 (D.Ariz. Jan. 28, 2009). ... (but presumably only for the "limited" remedy of declaring Apple's copyrights unenforceable). * Capitol Records, Inc. v. MP3tunes, LLC, 2009 WL 637102 (S.D.N.Y. March 4,
... , arguing why fair use should not apply here (through an expert report...???). * Arista Records LLC v. Usenet.com, Inc., 2009 WL 185992 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. ...
Search on: Blawgs.FM | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blog Search | Technorati | Google | MSN | Yahoo!