Search for: "Citrix Systems, Inc."
Results 1 - 9 of 9
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
28 Aug 5:47 am
... final judgment or judicial rejection of the offending motion in order to prevail. Orenshteyn v. Citrix Systems, Inc., Case
Nos. 03-1427, 08-1378, -1400 (Fed. Cir., July 24, 2009) (Lourie, J.) (non-precedential). Alexander Orenshteyn sued Citrix System
(Citrix) for patent infringement on April 9, 2002. On March 6, 2003, after the ... -infringement. On June 19, 2003, 35 days after presenting
its motion to counsel, Citrix filed its motion for Rule 11 sanctions with the district court. Rule 11 requires ...
4 Jun 7:45 am
... LLC v. Citrix Systems, Inc., 2009 WL 1514426(E.D.Tex. May 29, 2009) (NO. 6:07 CV 48) Judge: Leonard ... trial before Judge
Davis in Tyler later this month. The last defendant standing, Citrix filed a motion for summary judgment asserting a license defense based on a
settlement agreement ... fact discovery regarding the applicability of the Agreement. As stated at the pretrial hearing, the Court granted Citrix's motion for summary judgment based on the Agreement release provision, holding that the release ...
27 Aug, 2008 5:10 am
Reuters reports Judah Klausner filed a patent infringement lawsuit on Aug. 26 in ED Texas against Google Inc, Verizon Communications Inc, LG Electronics Inc
Comverse Technology Inc, Citrix Systems Inc and Embarq Corp over technology related to visual voicemail. Verizon had filed
a DJ action two weeks ago in ED NY seeking a declaration of patent invalidity. Apple had settled earlier. See Apple settles with Klausner over iPhone
3 Jun 1:16 pm
Accolade Systems LLC v. Citrix Systems, Inc. et al, No. 6:07cv00048) (May 11, 2009) Judge: Leonard Davis Motion to Limit
Number of Claims and Prior Art References DENIED Plaintiff asked that the court limit the number of claims and prior art references. Judge Davis denied the motion, noting that "[w]hile
the Court always encourages parties to focus their cases to the most relevant claims and references, the Court does not usually impose a limit on the number of ...
22 Mar, 2008 2:00 am
... : (IP Factor) Italy Italian Supreme Court decides compatible bricks for Lego systems 'not unfair competition': (Class 46), Consorzio del Prosciutto di Parma crackdown ...
DSS's UK patent invalidated in European Central Bank v Document Security Systems Inc: (IPKat), Scottish Court hands down judgment in passing-off case Wise ... FM
Industries over program used to manage debt collection information: (IP Law360), Citrix - Citrix wins
stay in patent dispute with Communique, pending patent re-examination: ...
6 Jun, 2008 6:49 am
... relaxes approach to Swiss claims: Actavis UK Limited v Merck & Co Inc: (Managing Intellectual Property), Protonix (Pantoprazole) - US: Would-be class action plaintiffs
Dik ... ) Pty Ltd: (IPRoo), Professor Fitzgerald's submissions to National Review of Innovation System: (IP:KCE), ACIP review of patentable subject matter: (IPRoo), (IPwar's),
... Designs: RMF Global v Cattan: (Patent Appeal Tracer), Citrix - Orenshteyn v Citrix
Systems: (Patent Appeal Tracer), Climax Molybdenum - 'Excess' 285 awards ...
24 Aug, 2007 1:01 am
... the end of the year. Visit Large Law Firm Shareholders Sue Over Alleged Backdating by Citrix Systems Execs Daily Business Review A
recent flurry of lawsuits by shareholders ... Citrix Systems in federal court in Florida alleges that 17 current and former
Citrix executives, directors and members of the compensation committee unjustly enriched themselves at the expense ... , 3rd Floor, San
Francisco, CA 94102 (800) 903-9872. ALM Privacy Policy / Contact Us © 2007 ALM Properties, Inc. All rights reserved.
26 Aug, 2008 5:10 pm
Emboldened by settlements with Apple and AT&T, inventor Judah Klausner filed a new voicemail patent lawsuit against Google, Verizon Communications and others. The inventor's
company, Klausner Technologies Inc, also named as defendants LG Electronics, Comverse Technology, Citrix Systems, Embarq in a
patent infringement complaint filed in U.S. District Court in Tyler, Texas, according to a court filing. Read the article: Reuters
10 Dec, 2007 3:30 am
... a case filed in Honolulu rather than Texarkana). 8) Cambridge Technology Development, Inc. v. Microsoft (NDIL, November 16). Appears to be a category-1 NPE that is a shell
... (DNJ, November 20) 12) Motorola, Ambit Microsystems, Arris Group, Cisco Systems, Netgear, Scientific-Atlanta, and Thomson v. Rembrandt Technologies LP (DJ) ... sues Google.
Read more about it at the end of this post. 135) Gemini IP v. Citrix (Sherman, November 19). Erich Spangenberg, for the second time in a month.
The guy keeps ...
Search on: Blawgs.FM | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blog Search | Technorati | Google | MSN | Yahoo!