Search for: "Cordis Corporation"
Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
26 Jan, 2008 4:27 am
There has been a Class 1 Recall for Product: Fire Star™ RX and Dura Star™ RX PTCA Balloon Catheters manufactured by the Florida based Cordis
Corporation. The concerned products were manufactured in Mexico from February, 2007 through December, 2007 and distributed worldwide from March
26, 2007 through January 8, 2008. Dura Star™ RX was distributed in the U.S. on August 29, 2007 and Fire Star™ RX was distributed in the U.S. on August 31, ...
26 Jan, 2008 4:27 am
There has been a Class 1 Recall for Product: Fire Star™ RX and Dura Star™ RX PTCA Balloon Catheters manufactured by the Florida based Cordis
Corporation. The concerned products were manufactured in Mexico from February, 2007 through December, 2007 and distributed worldwide from March
26, 2007 through January 8, 2008. Dura Star™ RX was distributed in the U.S. on August 29, 2007 and Fire Star™ RX was distributed in the U.S. on August 31, ...
6 Feb, 2007 7:44 pm
District Court Erred in Exercising Jurisdiction Over Foreign Patent Infringement Claims. (Fed. Cir. 2007, 05-1238) Voda is a resident of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Cordis is a U.S.-based entity incorporated in Florida. The patents at issue relate generally to guiding catheters for use in interventional cardiology and
include both U.S. and foreign patents issued from a common PCT application. [...]
16 Jun 10:43 am
Plaintiff Marlyn Riley had a Cordis Corp. stent implanted in a coronary artery and, apparently, suffered a heart attack two years later when a
blood clot formed at the site of the stent. The way the stent functions, it prevents build-up of new tissue on implantation by a slow release of medicine but, in doing so, the normal
healing process is slowed and there is an increase of risk of blood clot formation. In a 33-page Memorandum & Order, District Court Judge Patrick Schiltz granted ...
16 Aug, 2008 1:56 pm
... order which prevented plaintiff's counsel from sharing confidential trade-secret related information with "at least 20 other law firms" who were interested in the material despite
not having any relevant pending litigation. The case is Cordis Corporation and Johnson & Johnson
of New Jersey v. Sean O'Shea. The underlying dispute involves a medical products liability case over the CYPHER drug-eluting stent implant. The plaintiff requested contracts, ...
28 Jan, 2008 10:00 pm
... and is associated with prolonging life or the quality of life. From the FDA's report, Class 1 Recall: Cordis Corporation Dura Star™ RX and Fire Star™ RX PTCA Balloon Catheters, the ... additional lots above 13315455 are affected. (No lots above 13329055 are
affected). Contact the Recalling Firm: Cordis Corporation, 14201 NW 60th Avenue, Miami Lakes, Florida
33014-2802. Cordis is a Johnson & Johnson subsidiary. Public Contact: Consumers with questions may contact Cordis, Inc. at 1-786-313-2000.
7 Apr 5:53 am
I'm happy to announce that patent opinions published on Promote the Progress now include any and all figures from the original slip opinion of the court. See Cordis Corporation v. Boston Scientific for an example. We process the text of all opinions to add paragraph numbers
with linkable anchors, which means that you can now deep link right to a figure from a particular opinion, like so. All newly posted ...
11 Jan, 2008 9:00 am
... patents infringed by Medtronic, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation: (SmartBrief), (IP Law360), (IP Updates), (Patent Prospector),
eSpeed - Citing Seagate, US Federal judge ... made by Panasonic Corp., Logitech Inc. and other headset manufacturers: (IP Law360), (Patent Prospector), Cordis Corporation - US Court of Appeals upholds verdicts in favour ... log resolved by joint CR 37(a)(2)(B)
submission in Wacom's patent infringement case against Hanvon Corporation: (Washington State Patent Law Blog), ...
17 Aug 12:40 pm
In Cordis Corporation v. Boston Scientific Corporation and
Scimed Life Systems, Inc., C.A. No. 98-197-SLR (D. Del. Aug. 10, 2009), Judge Robinson reversed her March 2002 decision that ... of the material prior art could not carry over to the
later patent because the prior art in question was identified in connection with this later patent and reviewed by the PTO examiner. Id. at 9-10. Cordis Corporation v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Scimed Life
Systems, Inc., C.A. No. 98-197-SLR (D. Del. Aug ...
25 Feb, 2007 4:01 pm
... decided not to decide. Foreign patents, that is. It seems that Jan K. Voda, M.D. wanted to enforce three Angioplasty guide catheter patents granted by the USPTO to him. He brought
suit against Cordis Corporation, a medical device manufacturer in Oklahoma. Voda also alleged that
Cordis was selling the catheter in foreign countries and those sales violated foreign patents that Voda held. Since Voda was already in US
District Court in Oklahoma over his ...
28 Oct 9:03 pm
... Consumers should immediate stop usage and contact Qualitest at (800) 444-4011 for reimbursement. In other medical product recall news, Cordis Corporation today initiated a recall of its CROSSOVER™ Sheath Introducer. Apparently this defective product
(manufactured by Thomas Medical Products, Inc. and distributed by Cordis) is prone to fracturing inside a patient's vein or artery. Designed as
a long-coil, kink-resistant catheter sheath for introducing ...
2 Apr 12:44 am
Global Patent Holdings, represented by Niro Scavone, lost an appeal at the CAFC. Elsewhere, in the stent wars, Cordis Corporation ("Cordis") appeals, and Boston Scientific Corporation and
Scimed Life Systems, Inc. ("Boston Scientific") cross-appeal, from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. The CAFC said: With one minor
exception, we affirm. Note that the CAFC ...
29 Aug, 2008 1:25 pm
... (Patent Prospector), CAFC deals another blow to patent trolls: Voda v Cordis Corporation:
(Managing Intellectual Property), Federal Circuit draws the line on declaratory judgment ... seeks to drop latest suit over pet ID chips: (Law360), Dial Corporation - S C Johnson sues Dial again alleging patent infringement in ongoing ... does not constitute 'sham' litigation in violation of antitrust laws:
(Law360), Hearst Corporation - Time, Hearst and others file copyright infringement suit against owners and ...
2 Feb, 2007 2:16 am
In Voda, M.D. v. Cordis Corporation (February 1, 2007), the Federal Circuit held that the lower court
erred in granting Voda leave to amend his complaint to add infringement claims based on foreign patents under 28 U.S.C. § 1367. Voda's amended complaint alleged infringement taking
place outside the United States in violation of patents issued by various foreign countries. Section 1367(a) provides the statutory authority for district courts to exercise
supplemental ...
5 Feb, 2007 10:37 pm
... device"), claim invalidity for anticipation, review of claim construction to determine improper rejection of summary judgment motion of anticipation Voda, M.D. v. Cordis Corporation (02/01/2007): interlocutory appeal regarding the assumption of supplemental subject matter
jurisdiction over foreign patent infringement claims of plaintiff, discussion of patents relating to guiding catheters for interventional cardiology (U.S. Patent Nos. ...
10 Oct, 2007 11:25 am
... as any extraordinary specialized training Florida Covenant-Not-To-Compete Cases: Injunction is the normal remedy for breach of a covenant not to compete. Graphic Business Systems,
Inc. v. Rogge, 418 So.2d 1084, 1086 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982), Cordis Corporation v. Prooslin, 482 So.2d
486, 489 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Miller Mechanical, Inc. v. Ruth, 300 So.2d 11, 12 (Fla. 1974). With regard to covenants not to compete, the court ...
18 Aug, 2008 6:13 pm
... Voda's case is an exciting tale of an individual inventor litigating against a major corporation in the red sandy soil of western Oklahoma.
A jury found that Cordis catheters infringed Voda's patents and adjudged a reasonable royalty to be ... The CAFC looked to Voda's experts to
find evidence of insubstantial difference. In particular, Voda's expert testified that the Cordis "curve portion" was essentially straight and
that "cardiologists would have difficulty distinguishing the two during use." In ...
21 Jan 7:15 am
... " control." The court even seems willing to attack specific secondary considerations of nonobviousness. In Tokyo Keiso v. SMC Corporation,
the court again pointed to a "strong showing of obviousness" as support for affirming a district court's summary judgment of obviousness ... extend to the scope and applicability of
secondary considerations of nonobviousness. Related posts: Boston Scientific v. Cordis: post-KSR obviousness without the Graham analysis Last
week in Boston Scientific v. Cordis, the ...
23 Aug, 2008 1:23 am
... that content owners must consider fair use before sending takedowns: Stephanie Lenz v Universal Music Corporation: (Electronic Frontier
Foundation), (IPKat), (Techdirt), (The Prior Art), (Technology & Marketing Law Blog), (Public Knowledge), ... patents with its Stormer, Sprinter and Endeavour Sprint products:
(Law360), Boston Scientific - Federal judge rules that Cordis infringed two patents related to device for treating aneurysms that belong to
Target Therapeutics and are licensed to Boston ...
9 Jan 7:00 am
... Dose of IP) Developing and preserving evidence of conception (Inventive Step) Idle corporate IP can bolster your TTO's portfolio (Technology Transfer Tactics) ... not
informing court about changes in law in midst of litigation: Rentrop v Spectranetics Corporation (Promote the Progress) CAFC: PTO must
interpret claims in light of specification and ... case Mars, Inc v Coin Acceptors, Inc (Law360) (Hal Wegner) Cordis - Defendants appeal
infringement, validity and damages findings concerning coronary stents ...
Search on: Blawgs.FM | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blog Search | Technorati | Google | MSN | Yahoo!