Search for: "Coxcom, Inc"
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe:  20 results  |  100 results
9 Sep, 2008 4:49 pm by Eric
... on the accessing of copyrighted web pages. See, e.g., Ticketmaster v. RMG. * Interactive Retail Management, Inc. v. Microsoft Online, L.P., 2008 WL 3851691 (Fla. App. Ct. Aug. 20, 2008). ... plaintiff's pay-per-view delivery and billing system is technological measure that effectively controls access to copyrighted works, and digital cable filter allows subscribers to "avoid" or "bypass" that technological measure (CoxCom Inc. v. Chaffee, 1st Cir., 8/4/08)" * AP v. Moreover settles. My initial post ...
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
4 Aug, 2008 8:11 pm by S. COTUS
CoxCom, Inc. v. Chaffee, No. 07-2030. This appeal includes a rough description of how pay-per-view programming works. The Chaffees would sell a box which would essentially make it possible to get a limited amount of programming. These boxes are really just "low pass filters" which are normally legally and have plenty of commercial, residential, and recreational uses. Nevertheless, the First does all it can to affirm. The big issue for most lawyers is a jury trial waiver issue. The ...
Tags: Procedure, Civil
Appellate Law & Practice - http://appellate.typepad.com/appellate/
16 Feb 12:14 pm
In the recent decision in Lyons v. Coxcom, Inc., 2009 WL 347285 (S.D. Cal. Feb. 6, 2009), the court granted a motion to dismiss, highlighting the need to plead damages resulting from wrongful conduct in actions brought under California's consumer protection statutes. In Lyons, the plaintiff upgraded her internet service to the defendant's "premier" service with "PowerBoost" package in order to take advantage of "blazing fast" internet service and "up to ...
Jackson on Consumer Class Actions and Mass Torts Blawg - http://www.consumerclassactionsmasstorts.com/
17 Jul 5:22 am by Michael J. Hassen
... various defendants, including Cox Enterprises, Cox Communications, Cox Communications Louisiana, Cox Communications New Orleans, and CoxCom (collectively "the Cox defendants"), together with an additional 14 potentially-related class action alleging antitrust violations; specifically, the ... the ability to obtain premium cable services in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act." In re Cox Enterprises, Inc., Set-Top Cable Television Box Antitrust Litig., ___ F.Supp.2d ___ (Jud.Pan.Mult. ...
Class Action Defense Blog - http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/
         
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck