Search for: "Cummins Allison Corp"
Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
27 Apr, 2007 4:40 am
Cummins-Allison Corp. v. Glory Ltd., No. 02 C 7008 (N.D.
Ill. Apr. 25, 2007) (Posner, J.).Judge Posner, sitting by designation, entered an order dismissing all claim and counterclaims without prejudice and terminating the case, on what
appeared to be near...
20 Nov 9:31 am
Cummins-Allison Corp. v. SBM Co., Ltd., --- F.Supp.2d ----,
2009 WL 3855958 (E.D.Tex. Nov 13, 2009) (NO. CIV.A. 9:07CV196) Judge: Ron Clark Holding: Order re: Damages for Post-verdict Sales of Infringing Products This order arose in the context
of sales made after the date of the verdict for the plaintiff and before the date the court entering an injunction to prevent future infringing conduct. In this case, pursuant to notice
given to the parties well before trial, the jury was asked to ...
29 Jun, 2007 4:20 am
In yesterday's edition, the Chicago Tribune published a commentary on the Patent Reform Act of 2007 by Cummins-Allison Corp.'s Chairman William J. Jones -- Cummins-Allison is based in Mt. Prospect, Illinois and develops and distributes coin and currency handling/counting machines. Jones has strong feelings about the Act
and offers some unique opinions. First, he is against "harmonizing" US law with ...
7 Sep, 2007 6:52 am
... here (link). Microsoft Win in Court May Cut Chances in Congress - From Bloomberg: Microsoft Corp.'s success in reversing a $1.52 billion
trial loss was the latest in a series of ... patent reform raising fears" - Jeffrey Knoll, VP and Corporate Counsel for Cummins-Allison Corp.: We've had very bad experiences in Europe . . . Competitors lay in ... rights back and forth, along
the way suing a list of companies including Microsoft Corp., Google Inc. , AT&T Inc. and Nike Inc. in different states. ( ...
13 Nov, 2006 3:57 am
Cummins-Allison Corp. v. Glory Ltd., __ F.Supp.2d __, 2006
WL 2931999 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 13, 2006) (Kendall, J.).Judge Kendall performed a very thorough claim construction in this opinion, but what is most interesting about it is the procedural
history. The...
26 Feb, 2007 3:58 am
Cummins-Allison Corp. v. Glory Ltd., No. 02 C 7008, 2007 WL
487564 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 12, 2007) (Kendall, J.).Judge Kendall denied summary judgment of invalidity for defendant in this patent dispute (you can find the Court's prior claim
construction ruling...
27 Jun, 2007 10:27 pm
... commentary by David Vandagriff on June 25, the Chicago Tribune has a commentary on June 28 by William J. Jones (chairman of the Mt. Prospect-based Cummins-Allison Corp.) which ends with the text: The breadth of opposition
to this legislation [S. 1145] indicates the need for a fuller debate, but Sen. Leahy has tossed his lot with Microsoft, Intel and their allies. His desire to rush the bill through the
Senate does ...
26 Jul, 2007 11:06 am
... industry. Manufacturing has been irked over the cool reception they've perceived during the Congressional hearings. William J. Jones, chairman of Cummins-Allison Corp. stated the following in an op-ed piece in the
Chicago Tribune: At the recent Senate hearing, not a single manufacturing firm was invited to testify -- even though technological innovation and industrial advancement are closely
intertwined. Indeed, U.S. ...
5 Nov, 2008 8:02 am
"Without minimizing the importance of intellectual property rights, it seems that if we can submit death penalty cases to juries, we should also be able to trust them to determine a
royalty rate that will be paid by a corporation if it chooses to make sales of an infringing product." Cummins-Allison Corp v. Shinwoo Information & Telecomm. Co., Ltd., 9-07-cv-00196 (TXED November 3, 2008, Order)
22 Jan 12:02 pm
Cummins-Allison Corp. v. SBM Co., Ltd., 584 F.Supp.2d 916
(E.D.Tex. Nov 03, 2008) (NO. 9:07 CV 196) Judge: Ron Clark Holding: Objections to Submission of Future Royalty Rate to Jury OVERRULED As readers know, Judge Clark recently started
issuing orders indicating he would consider submitting to the jury a question on future damages. Plaintiff in this case objected, asserting that because it is entitled to a permanent
injunction if the jury finds infringement, submission of a question on ...
3 Nov 12:53 am
... or more valid claims. . . . The court further finds . . . that the $400.00 per unit reasonable royalty found by the jury should be enhanced to $500.00 per unit for sales of
infringing products occurring between trial and the date the injunction is entered." Cummins-Allison
Corp. v. Shinwoo Information & Telecomm. Co., Ltd. et al., 9-07-cv-00196 (TXED October 30, 2009, Order) (Clark, J.)
Search on: Blawgs.FM | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blog Search | Technorati | Google | MSN | Yahoo!