Search for: "Cynosure, Inc"
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
18 May 9:17 pm
... cause confusion with the registered mark SYNERGIE PEEL for "medical devices used for microdermabrasion" [PEEL disclaimed]. In re Cynosure, Inc., 90 USPQ2d 1644 (TTAB 2009) [precedential]. The marks: The Board had little difficulty in concluding that ... and both marks connote "synergy." Applicant
argued that familiarity with its corporate name and its two registered marks, CYNOSURE and CYNOSURESPA, would cause consumers to pronounce the subject mark with a long "I",
whereas the cited mark would have ...
25 May 5:20 pm
... Gene Technology (IP Watchdog) CAFC: Inequitable conduct holding vacated: Dickson Industries, Inc v Patent Enforcement Team, LLC (not
precedential) (Patently-O) District Court ... enters judgment due to defendant's blatant failure to comply with Board Order: MySpace, Inc v
Donnell Mitchell (TTABlog) TTAB precedential no 19: Family-of-marks argument ... to overcome 2(d) refusal; sophisticated purchaser claim fails too: In re Cynosure,
Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms PTO's latest section 2(a) scandalous refusal ...
Search on: Blawgs.FM | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blog Search | Technorati | Google | MSN | Yahoo!