Search for: "Dice Electronics, LLC"
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe:  20 results  |  100 results
24 Feb 10:24 am
Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC v. Dice Electronics, LLC, 9-08-cv-00163 (TXED February 20, 2009, Order). Plaintiff Affinity filed suit ... : attorney files a request for ex parte reexamination of the patent with the PTO on behalf of Dice Electronics, LLC. Dec. 9, 2008: The PTO grants the request and orders reexamination of ... partes reexamination. All are waiting to let [reexamination counsel], on behalf of Defendant Dice Electronics, LLC, take a shot at defeating Affinity Labs. Of course, if things do not ...
Two-Seventy-One Patent Blog - http://271patent.blogspot.com
27 Feb 7:00 am
... parte re-examination sinks motion to stay: Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC v Dice Electronics, LLC (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (EDTexweblog.com) District Court ... (Law360) Technology Development and Licensing - DirecTV Group, sole remaining defendant in electronic TV program guide patent dispute reaches settlement with TDL (Law360) Transamerica ... says DRUMLINE LIVE merely descriptive of musical performance: In re Halftime Live LLC (not precedential) (TTABlog) Two TTAB fraud decisions now await CAFC ...
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/blog
23 Feb 11:31 pm by The Docket Navigator
... lay behind the log, hoping for favorable developments with the passage of time. Instead of streamlining the process, Defendants' choice guarantees the imposition of additional costs on [plaintiff], and indicates a lack of desire to resolve the issues in the case in a timely manner." Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC v. Dice Electronics, LLC, 9-08-cv-00163 (TXED February 20, 2009, Order)
Docket Report Patent Infringement Blog - http://docketreport.blogspot.com/
24 Feb 1:08 pm by Michael C. Smith
Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC v. Dice Electronics, LLC et al (9-08-cv-00163) (Feb. 20. 2009) Judge: Ron Clark Defendant filed a motion for stay, noting that it had filed an ex parte reexamination of patent in suit. Others may disagree, but I detected a touch of judicial disapproval in Judge Clark's order, expressed some dislike for the defendant's choice of reexamination, and well as the circumstances of the case. "Defendants did not act with dispatch in seeking ...
Eastern District of Texas Federal Court Practice - http://mcsmith.blogs.com/eastern_district_of_texas/
         
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck