Search for: "Dripping Wet Water, Inc."
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
12 Dec, 2008 9:00 am
... (Michael Geist) Canada Depreciation a possible ground in opposition proceedings: Parmalat Canada Inc v Sysco Corporation (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trademarks Office considers
changes ... settlement does not create federal jurisdiction: Idex Corp v Dripping Wet Water,
Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Parties must justify ... American Convention: Corporation Cimex SA v DM Enterprises & Distributors Inc (not precedential)
(Guest comment by Marty Schwimmer) (TTABlog) TTAB affirms refusal ...
9 Dec, 2008 11:12 am
Idex Corp. v. Dripping Wet Water, Inc., No. 08 C 1114, 2008 WL 4372038 (N.D. Ill. Feb.
26, 2008) (Shadur, Sen. J.). Judge Shadur sua sponte gave plaintiffs one week to amend their pleadings to resolve potential subject matter jurisdiction issues. The Court noted that the
breach of a patent settlement did not create federal question jurisdiction because the agreement was about a patent. And the Court held that it was not sufficient for diversity
jurisdiction just to plead ...
Search on: Blawgs.FM | BlawgSearch Google Co-op |
Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blog Search |
Technorati | Google | MSN | Yahoo!