Search for: "Ernesto A Miranda"
Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe:  20 results  |  100 results
31 Jan, 2008 4:00 pm
... pornography suspect that he was not under arrest, but acted with so many of the hallmarks of a detention as to have required the Miranda warnings that they did not give. Colonna describes the circumstances surrounding his interrogation by the police as ... , he was told twice that lying to a federal agent was a federal offense. And, at no time was he given Miranda warnings or informed that he was free to leave. The district court found that "given the totality of the circumstances, a reasonable ...
Underdog Blog - http://markskatz.com/blog2/serendipity/
16 Mar, 2008 5:52 am by Steve Kalar
... the Ninth finds that the old "clarification rule" survived the Supreme Court's limitations in Davis: an ambiguous assertion of Miranda rights at the outset of an interrogation must be clarified by law enforcement before interrogation can proceed. Players: Big win by ... - look at how law enforcement and courts have gutted the Miranda goals, see Professor Weisselberg's piece, Mourning Miranda, available here. (Ernesto Miranda, the defendant, is shown right). For another big (and recent) Ninth Miranda ...
Ninth Circuit Blog - http://circuit9.blogspot.com
14 Jun, 2008 12:00 am by Bobby G. Frederick
June 13, 1966. From History.com: On this day in 1966, the Supreme Court hands down its decision in Miranda v. Arizona, establishing the principle that all criminal suspects must be advised of their rights before interrogation. Now considered standard ... were inconclusive. However, tracking the license plate number of a car that resembled that of her attacker's brought police to Ernesto Miranda, who had a prior record as a peeping tom. Although the victim did not identify Miranda in a line-up, he ...
South Carolina Criminal Defense Blog - http://www.southcarolinacriminaldefenseblog.com/
28 Aug, 2008 4:00 am
... , but that is not the situation. Generally, the police must advise a suspect of his or her Miranda rights if the suspect is in custody; if not, the failure to so advise is grounds for ... violation stop generally does not, at the early stages, trigger a need to give Miranda warnings, because the stop and initial questioning, by themselves, do not put ... .2d 875 (1989). What to do with the many times courts do not require Miranda rights? For starters, how about if each of us puts slogans on our cars, t- ...
Underdog Blog - http://markskatz.com/blog2/serendipity/
13 Jun, 2008 10:26 am by Blakely
From the History Channel's website: On this day in 1966, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Miranda v. Arizona, establishing the principle that all criminal suspects must be advised of their rights before interrogation. The roots of the ... results were inconclusive. However, tracking the license plate number of a car that resembled that of her attacker's brought police to Ernesto Miranda, who had a prior record as a peeping tom. Although the victim did not identify Miranda in a line-up, ...
Judgment Day - http://www.judgmentdayblog.com/blog/
6 Sep 3:55 pm by Jeff Gamso
... Baird, you knew his most famous client: Ernesto Miranda. The backstory, which you already know, is that Miranda was charged with rape. He gave a confession to the cops ... He appealed the case and the Supreme Court threw out the confession, creating the Miranda warnings in the process. It's after that, for the second trial, that Baird came on board - in time ... confession he gave the authorities). Baird argued cases at SCOTUS, but not Miranda's (that was two other lawyers at Lewis & Roca. But they're ...
Gamso - For the Defense - http://gamso-forthedefense.blogspot.com/
6 Oct 9:00 pm
Ernesto Miranda (r). (Image from State Department's blank">website). In neighboring Prince George's County, Maryland, a seasoned police officer rambled about and mis-advised a murder arrestee about his Miranda rights. For the officer's deep and damaging straying from Miranda's warning script, ... 's theme is that "police interrogators will do well not to stray too far from the canonical text" of Miranda. State v. Luckett, __ Md. App. _ (Oct. 5, 2009). Jon Katz.
Underdog Blog - http://markskatz.com/blog2/serendipity/
23 Feb, 2008 2:28 am by SHG
... recognizes that the police haven't been sitting around eating donuts since Miranda was decided. Well, okay, they have, but they have people who do stuff ... was decided, the Supreme Court has encouraged police practices that have effectively gutted Miranda's safeguards. This paper presents police training materials that are not generally available ... makes their job infinitely easier. Few on the defense side favor the end of Ernesto Miranda's legacy, mostly because we've lived with it for a long time ...
Simple Justice - http://blog.simplejustice.us
13 Nov, 2008 8:34 pm by William Ryan Moore
... what does it mean? The Miranda warning came out of a 1966 Supreme Court decision called Miranda v. Arizona, in which Ernesto Miranda's criminal defense lawyer appealed his client's conviction for robbery and attempted ... to the crimes. The Miranda warning prevents police from taking advantage of suspects who have been arrested or are in police custody. The Miranda Court determined that these protections were necessary to safeguard suspects' Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. The ...
Florida Criminal Lawyer Blog - http://www.floridacriminallawyerblog.com/
13 Jun 3:00 am
... this day in ... … 1966, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. Arizona that police must inform suspects of their rights before questioning them. Chief Justice Earl ... be appointed to represent him. This section of the opinion has evolved into what's known as the Miranda warnings. developed to protect the individual's Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination." (credit for photo of law enforcement file on petitioner Ernesto Miranda) … 1944 (65 years ago today), U.N. Secretary-General Ban ...
IntLawGrrls - http://intlawgrrls.blogspot.com/index.html
17 Mar, 2008 10:46 pm
... the case Miranda v. Arizona reached the Supreme Court in 1966, coercive police interrogation took another blow. Ernesto Miranda had confessed to rape and kidnapping after two hours of interrogation, and the appeal to the ... his rights to silence and counsel before beginning an interrogation or any other attempt to get a statement from a suspect. The Miranda decision attempts to eliminate suspect ignorance as a contributing factor to involuntary confessions. In looking for a replacement for illegal ...
Sex Offender Issues - http://sexoffenderissues.blogspot.com/
24 Mar, 2007 11:00 pm
Ernesto Miranda (r). (Image from State Department's website). Praised be attorney Paul Charlton for wanting "FBI agents to tape-record interviews and confessions, particularly in child molestation cases on Arizona's 21 Indian reservations, something the FBI historically has not done." Unfortunately, Mr. Charlton's voice is of less authority on this matter now that he is one of the eight fired United States Attorneys. Why would law enforcement people not want to videotape suspects' " ...
Underdog Blog - http://markskatz.com/blog2/serendipity/
14 Mar, 2007 10:30 pm
... at 600-01, 30 S.E.2d at 32." Drumgoole, 26 Va. App. at 786-87. There you have it, the Virginia Supreme Court in 1944 -- long before so many critical Supreme Court decisions on criminal defendants' rights, including Miranda, saying that "To confine the cross-examination of the accused to such matters as have been brought out on direct examination is 'palpably unfair to the prosecution.'" Id. A fellow criminal defense lawyer has a good idea for handling this conundrum: If at the arraignment the ...
Underdog Blog - http://markskatz.com/blog2/serendipity/
22 Feb, 2007 9:15 pm
Chief Judge Bell is blank">Brown's sole dissenter The United States Supreme Court has not decided the extent to which the police may seize non-residents visiting a home being searched by police pursuant to a valid search warrant. However, on February 7, 2007, the Maryland Court of Appeals provided police a green light to seize such visitors at least to make some initial inquiries. Brown v. State, __ Md. _ (Feb. 7, 2007). As a result, Maryland's highest court upheld the conviction of such a ...
Underdog Blog - http://markskatz.com/blog2/serendipity/
16 Aug, 2007 5:45 am by Doug B.
... Gonzales' removal or impeachment, his allies dismiss the possibility he committed crimes while emphasizing that he is tough on crime. It is a defense that leaves many lawyers chuckling. The fact is that Gonzales is the best thing to come along for criminal defendants since Ernesto Miranda. Gonzales' appetite for unchecked power has served to undermine prosecutions and alienate courts.... Federal judges now openly question the veracity of ...
Tags: Sentences
Sentencing Law and Policy - http://sentencing.typepad.com/sentencing_law_and_policy/
3 Sep 2:02 am
... abuse and misconduct. So far the city has selected six outside law firms to take more of the cases to trial. " Miranda's last defender succumbs to cancer "Peter D. Baird, the last attorney directly involved in the legal defense of Ernesto Arturo Miranda - whose seminal U.S. Supreme Court case lead to the enshrinement of the Miranda warning against self-incrimination - died on Aug. 27 of leukemia. Baird, 68, was a partner at Phoenix firm Lewis and Roca, where ...
New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library Blog - http://www.bloglines.com/blog/PLL
19 Nov, 2006 9:31 pm
... should be read in conjunction with Kaye's fingerprint article. Finally, Yale Kamissar has On the Fortieth Anniversary of Miranda: Why We Needed It, How We Got It - and What Happened to It [suggested citation: Kamisar, Yale, "On the Fortieth ... in states that have the death penalty.". Looking ahead, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in Ex Parte Jose Ernesto Medellin holds that President Bush was powerless to force the Texas judiciary to disregard its rules of procedural default to consider on ...
Capital Defense Weekly - http://www.capitaldefenseweekly.com
10 Oct, 2007 6:16 am
... Mexican nationals on death row in several U.S. states. The case centers on the rights of one of this group of Mexicans, Jose Ernesto Medellin, granted under the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, a treaty that the U.S. signed and ratified in 1962. Article ... Medellin was arrested by local police in Texas for the brutal murder of two teenage girls. The authorities read him his Miranda rights. But as with most foreign nationals placed under arrest in the U.S., Medellin was not informed of the ...
Tags: Guest, Bloggers
ACSBlog - http://www.acsblog.org/
7 Jul, 2008 5:11 pm by WOLFGANG P. HIRCZY DE MIÑO
... .O. v. SANDRA QUINNEY; from Comal County; 3rd district (03-06-00119-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 11-10-06) 07-0439 JORGE MIRANDA, M.D. v. GUADALUPE ADRIANA MARTINEZ, BRYAN POWERS, AND LEMUEL LOPEZ; from Hidalgo County; 13th district (13-06-00386-CV, ___ SW3d ... R. CAVAZOS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO-TRUSTEE OF THE ANITA R. CAVAZOS LIVING TRUST, AND ANITA RENTFRO v. MANUEL V. CAVAZOS, IV AND ERNESTO R. CAVAZOS; from Zapata County; 4th district (04-06-00451-CV, 246 SW3d 175, 11-14-07) 3 petitions 08-0193 ARTHUR E. ...
The Jefferson Court Blog - http://texas-opinions.blogspot.com/
         
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck