Search for: "Forest Laboratories Holdings, LTD."
Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe:  20 results  |  100 results
13 Feb, 2008 6:19 pm
... of Maryland pits brand and generic drug makers (source: Justia). #7: Forest Laboratories, Inc. v. Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., No. 1:2008cv00239, filed ... -listed U.S. Patent No. 5,061,703. Plaintiff Forest Labs. Holdings, Ltd., is an Irish company based in Bermuda; plaintiffs Merz Pharma GmbH & ... claim not to be able to determine with certainty which one of Lupin, Inc., or Lupin Ltd. was the actual filer of the ANDA. This move was in anticipation of a jurisdictional challenge by Lupin (see related ...
Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog - http://www.marylandiplaw.com/
17 Jan, 2008 10:00 pm
... IP Factor), (Spicy IP), (SmartBrief), (IP Law360), Namenda (Memantine) - Barr challenges Forest Laboratories' Namenda patent: (SmartBrief), (Generics Web), OxyContin (Oxycodone) - District Court finds ... application made in Dennis Gravolin and Trailer Vision Pty Ltd v Locmac Holdings Pty Ltd as trustee for Locmac Trust: (Mondaq) Canada US provisionals and ... of unidentified trade secrets found to be too vague: Patriot Homes, Inc v Forest River Housing: (IP Law Observer), Does 'up to' include zero?: Ex ...
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/blog
4 Apr, 2008 1:00 am
... revives Caraco's declaratory judgment suit against Forest Laboratories over patent for antidepressant despite a covenant by Forest not to sue: (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner ... Yasmin (Drospirenone) - Bayer appeals Yasmin patent invalidity in its battle against Barr Laboratories: (IP Law360), (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), (GenericsWeb) Africa Review of Joseph ... and passing off case Crocs Canada Inc v Holey Soles Holdings Ltd: (Canadian Trademark Blog), Federal Court of Appeal decision in Thorkelson v ...
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/blog
1 Feb, 2008 12:00 am
... District Court in relation to a cholesterol lowering drug: (The IP Factor), Namenda (Memantine) - Forest Laboratories sue six generic drug-makers over patent relating to Nemenda ... Under), Trade mark infringement: who can provide consent?: Industries Ltd v Dynamic Supply Pty Ltd: (IP Down Under) Brazil IFPI raids hundreds of ... before the CFI in its plant varieties case: (IPKat), AG delivers opinion in HutchinsonO2 holdings v 3G regarding comparative advertising containing non-identical trade marks: ...
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/blog
11 Apr, 2008 9:00 am
... IVAX: (SmartBrief), (IP Law360), (GenericsWeb), Lexapro (Escitalopram) - CAFC decision in Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd. v. Forest Laboratories, Inc. turns law of declaratory judgment on its head: (Patent Docs), (Patent Baristas), Mircera ( ... to trade mark SEO (generic acronym for 'search engine optimisation'): (Techdirt) US - Companies / Entities Agrizap - CAFC holds that strong prima facie case of obviousness not overcome by secondary indicia of non-obviousness: Agrizap v Woodstream: ...
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/blog
15 Jul 5:15 am
... rules District Court of The Hague: Novartis v Mylan and Actavis (PatLit) Levaquin (Levoflaxacin) - Canada: FCA holds generics raising allegations similar to those of previous generics allowed their day in court: Apotex v Janssen-Ortho (Global IP Watch) Lexapro (Escitalopram) - US: Caraco Pharmaceuticals enters into asset purchase agreement with Forest Laboratories to settle Lexapro ANDA patent litigation (SmartBrief) Lexapro (Escitalopram) - US: Forest Laboratories and H Lundbeck enter ...
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/blog
17 Apr 12:00 am
... ) - Baldwin's rules explained (The SPC Blog) Lexapro (Escitalopram) - federal district Judge agrees to determine whether Forest Laboratories destroyed key documents (Law 360) Pegasys (PEG interferon alfa 2a) - Roche wins post grant ... and Perrigo settle patent dispute (Law 360) Vyvanse (Lisdexamfetamine) - lawsuit over withdrawal of New Chemical Entity Exclusivity put on hold pending public comment to FDA (FDA Law Blog) Xeloda (Capecitabine) - Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. sues Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. ...
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/blog
27 Jun, 2008 10:04 am
... Canada: Court finds no basis for adding patent to Patent Register: Abbott Laboratories Limited v Canada (Minister of Health): (Pharmacapsules@Gowlings), Olux (Clobetasol propionate) ... Federal Court of Appeals holds appellant had no legitimate interest in registering VIRGIN for goods in class 32 and 33: Virgin Enterprises Ltd v Cafe ... National Arbitration Forum: (IP ADR Blog) US - Companies / Entities Abbott Laboratories - Church & Dwight scores $29M in doubled damages from Abbott in patent battle ...
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/blog
16 Aug, 2008 2:43 am
... analysis of Radiohead's 'pay what you want' downloads: (IP finance), How copyright is holding back the creative class: (Techdirt) Events 20 August - Bill Patry speaking ... interim injunction in case concerning tablet design: Troikaa Pharmaceuticals v Pro Laboratories: (Spicy IP), UK: High Court invalidates Human Genome Sciences' neutrokine ... infringes three JIMI HENDRIX trade marks: Experience Hendrix v Electric Hendrix: (Seattle Trademark Lawyer), Forest Group - False marking, not false advertising ...
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/blog
27 Feb 5:00 am
... over Perkin Elmer's marketing of Modified Sequential Screening protocol: Intema Ltd v NTD Laboratories, Inc et al (Patent Docs) US: District Court Delaware ... (Patent Docs) Lexapro (Escitalopram) - US: Supreme Court refuses to hear appeal from Forest Lab's allowing Caraco to continue bid to invalidate Lexapro patent despite ... (Patent Circle) Visudyne(Verteporfin) - US: CAFC refuses to rehear appeal of ruling holding QLT liable for unfair trade practices, unjust enrichment in patent ownership dispute ...
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/blog
17 Apr 5:27 pm
Forest Labs., Inc. v. Caraco Pharm. Labs., Ltd., 2009 WL 998402 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 14, 2009) In this case, defendants filed a motion seeking a hearing to address plaintiffs' suspected spoliation of evidence, ... , if backup tapes are accessible (i.e., actively used for information retrieval), then such tapes would likely be subject to the litigation hold. Plaintiffs argued the backup tapes were maintained solely for the purpose of disaster recovery and were not subject to the duty to preserve. ...
Electronic Discovery Law - http://www.ediscoverylaw.com/
         
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck