Search for: "Grantley Patent Holding Ltd. v. Clear Channel Communications, Inc."
Results 1 - 6 of 6
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe:  20 results  |  100 results
19 Jun, 2008 7:12 pm by Michael Smith
The Lufkin jury in Judge Clark's court in Grantley Patent Holdings, Ltd. v. Clear Channel Communications, Inc., (NO. CIV.A. 9:06CV259) returned a verdict in plaintiff's favor last month in the ... few interesting items. First, on the willfulness finding, Judge Clark noted that although the defendant objected that there was not evidence of willfulness with respect to some of the patents, it didn't object to the court submitting one question on willfulness, as opposed to patent by patent. However, the ...
Eastern District of Texas Federal Court Practice - http://mcsmith.blogs.com/eastern_district_of_texas/
20 Jun, 2008 1:30 pm by Joe Mullin
... good roundup of those decisions here. The trial was with Judge Clark in the Lufkin division. Grantley Patent Holdings was represented by Minneapolis-based Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi LLP, ... the plaintiffs in interest; Billy Shane Fox and a business partner own Grantley Patent Holdings, and they control the company that supports their MaxaGrid product. The company ... "Winning" supplement: Mom's Advice Wins. Grantley Patent Holding Ltd. v. Clear Channel Communications, Inc. 06-cv-00259-RC, E.D. ...
The Prior Art - http://thepriorart.typepad.com/the_prior_art/
19 May, 2008 8:06 am by Michael Smith
Another recent Lufkin patent case jury verdict. The Lufkin jury in Judge Clark's court in Grantley Patent Holdings, Ltd. v. Clear Channel Communications, Inc., (NO. CIV.A. 9:06CV259) recently returned a verdict in plaintiff's favor in the amount of $66,029,750. Yes on infringement, yes on willful, and no on the anticipation and obviousness defenses. Postverdict motions are pending.
Eastern District of Texas Federal Court Practice - http://mcsmith.blogs.com/eastern_district_of_texas/
19 May, 2008 7:44 am by Michael Smith
Grantley Patent Holdings, Ltd. v. Clear Channel Communications, Inc., 540 F.Supp.2d 724 (E.D.Tex. Mar 31, 2008) (NO. ... of materiality or intent to deceive. Judge Clark noted that inequitable conduct must be proven by clear and convincing evidence, and that the defendant had provided "scant" evidence of the failure to ... no genuine issue of material fact regarding the inequitable conduct claims [therefore] Grantley's motion for summary judgment is granted." Judge Clark's opinion in this case provided ...
Eastern District of Texas Federal Court Practice - http://mcsmith.blogs.com/eastern_district_of_texas/
28 Apr, 2008 11:00 am
... -style handbag depicted in artwork : (Innovationpartners) Europe CFI further clarifies dilution in Citigroup Inc v OHIM: (Catch Us If You Can!!!), Ferrero fends off Ferro ... same design field should be taken into account in registered Community design case: Green Lane Products Ltd v PMS International Group Plc & Ors: (IPKat), ... Olympus over capsule endoscopy products: (IP Law360), (IP Factor), Grantley Patent Holdings - Clear Channel Communications ordered to pay Grantley more than $66 million for ...
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/blog
12 Sep, 2008 2:33 pm
... application for MAGIC SEAT: Case T-363/06 Honda Motor Europe Ltd v OHIM: (Class 46), Germany Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Supreme Court) decides on ... judgment to several defendants, including WideBand, in trade secrets suit filed by ClearOne Communications against former employees: (Law360), Does zero include none?: Ex parte ... jury verdict of wilful infringement and patent validity and enforceability: Grantley Patent Holdings v Clear Channel: (PATracer), Clear With Computers - CWC settles with four ...
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/blog
         
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck