Search for: "Honda Motor CO., Ltd."
Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe:  20 results  |  100 results
10 Jul 8:39 am
... OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE YAMAHA MOTOR COMPANY, LTD., Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY, Respondent; JACK R. ... have meant incurring the expense of translating the pleadings into Japanese. (See Honda Motor Co. v. Superior Court (1992) 10 Cal.App.4th 1043, ... had designated an agent whose identity was easily ascertainable to accept service of process." (General Motors Corp., supra, 15 Cal.App.3d at p. 85.) To the degree that General ...
Law Offices of Steven W. Hansen - http://www.swhlaw.com/
24 Apr 10:00 am
... ITT marks remain on Israel trade mark register due to reputation in Israel: Ratfon Import Ltd v ITT Manufacturing Enterprises Inc (The IP Factor) Japan Supreme Court rules ... Inc (EDTexweblog.com) John Mezzalingua Associates - ITC denies Fu Ching Technical Industry Co's and Gem Electronics' joint motion for summary determination of noninfringement, invalidity, ... to use mark in US, TTAB sustains opposition to 44(e) application: Honda Motor Co, Ltd v Friedrich Winkelmann (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(e)(4) ...
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/blog
10 Apr 3:50 am
... use his mark in the USA, and so it sustained Honda's opposition on summary judgment. Honda Motor Co., Ltd. v. Friedrich Winkelmann, Opposition No. 91170552 ( ... applicant lacks such intention" under Section 1(b). Winkelmann responded to Honda's interrogatories by stating that he "has not had activities in the U.S. ... second. You will notice that in this case, the lack-of-bona-fide-intent ground was added by Honda after it took discovery and learned that Winkelmann had no documentation to substantiate ...
The TTABlog - http://thettablog.blogspot.com
3 Mar, 2008 9:39 pm
Here's the latest on Honda Motor Co Ltd and another v Neesam and others [2008] EWHC 338 (Ch). This is a decision last Thursday from Sir ... and sold them at a decent profit where they were more expensive. Initially Honda got summary judgment against all three defendants, and against another ... bikes that were the subject of proceedings noted by the IPKat here. This case was about the parallel importation of Honda motorcycles into the UK and their subsequent resale by the fourth defendant . Between ...
IPKat - http://ipkitten.blogspot.com
16 Jan, 2008 1:35 am by Bill Heinze
... issued in 2007: 1 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP 3148 2 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD KR 2725 3 CANON K K JP 1987 4 MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC ... LTD JP 1315 13 SEIKO EPSON CORP JP 1208 14 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO 914 15 INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG DE 856 16 DENSO CORP JP 803 17 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC 752 18 RICOH CO LTD JP 728 19 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD JP 719 20 SIEMENS AG DE 700 21 LG ... INTERNATIONAL INC 539 31 BROADCOM CORP 533 32 SILVERBROOK RESEARCH PTY LTD AU 533 33 XEROX CORP 517 34 RENESAS TECHNOLOGY CORP JP ...
I/P Updates - http://ip-updates.blogspot.com
15 Jan, 2008 7:36 am
... "The List": 1 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP - 3148 2 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD KR - 2725 3 CANON K K JP - 1987 4 MATSUSHITA ... - 1315 13 SEIKO EPSON CORP JP - 1208 14 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO - 914 15 INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG DE - 856 16 DENSO CORP JP - ... 17 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC - 752 18 RICOH CO LTD JP - 728 19 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD JP - 719 20 SIEMENS AG DE - 700 21 ... INTERNATIONAL INC - 539 31 BROADCOM CORP - 533 SILVERBROOK RESEARCH PTY LTD AU - 533 33 XEROX CORP - 517 RENESAS TECHNOLOGY CORP JP - ...
Tags: Patent, filers, Top
Two-Seventy-One Patent Blog - http://271patent.blogspot.com
7 Mar, 2008 2:00 am
... inventive step and because it claimed a computer program: Research in Motion UK Ltd v Visto Corporation: (IPKat), (Out-Law), British High Court rules ... Technica), Chancery Division finds in favour of defendants in parallel importation case Honda Motor Co Ltd & Anor v Neesam & Ors: (IPKat), English High ... Consumer Protection Regulations not directly enforceable by IP owners: (Rouse & Co International), UDRP: The liabilities for corporations and/or their lawyers: (The Trademark Blog) United ...
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/blog
13 Jun, 2008 3:40 am
... Dexcel from marketing formula containing Cyclosporins: Novartis AG v Dexcel-Pharma Ltd: (IPKat), Eloxatin (Oxaliplatin) - South Korean court dismisses Sanofi-Aventis' patent ... Blog), Bangladesh Applications for service mark registration now being accepted: (Rouse & Co International) Canada Proposed Canadian copyright law introduced: (ipblog.ca), (Techdirt ... IPKat), Court rules on trade mark use and parallel imports in Honda Motor Co Ltd v Derek James Neesam: (International Law Office), Strategic ...
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/blog
11 Jan, 2007 12:07 am by Two-Seventy-One Patent Blog
... Holders for 2006: 1 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP -- 3651 2 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD KR -- 2453 3 CANON K K JP -- 2378 4 MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC ... 2113 6 INTEL CORP -- 1962 7 SONY CORP JP -- 1810 8 HITACHI LTD JP -- 1749 9 TOSHIBA CORP JP -- 1717 10 MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC -- ... 18 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC -- 884 19 SIEMENS AG DE -- 857 20 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD JP -- 836 21 SUN MICROSYSTEMS INC -- 776 22 DENSO CORP JP -- 770 23 NEC CORP JP -- 744 24 RICOH CO LTD JP -- 695 25 LG ELECTRONICS INC KR -- 695
Two-Seventy-One Patent Blog - http://271patent.blogspot.com
14 Jan 6:02 am
... out the top 20 this way: 1 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP 4186 2 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD KR 3515 3 CANON K K JP 2114 4 MICROSOFT CORP 2030 5 INTEL CORP 1776 6 MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO LTD JP 1745 7 TOSHIBA CORP JP 1609 8 FUJITSU LTD JP 1494 9 SONY CORP JP 1485 10 HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT CO L P 1424 11 ... DE 814 18 LG ELECTRONICS INC KR 805 19 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC 757 20 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD JP 747 To see the top-35 list, click here. Two observations are made ...
Tags: USPTO, holders, Patent, Top
Two-Seventy-One Patent Blog - http://271patent.blogspot.com
11 Mar 12:00 am by John L. Welch
... to register in light of Honda's failure to provide an acceptable specimen of use. In re Honda Motor Co., Ltd., Serial No. 77044023 (February 23, 2009) [not precedential]. Original Specimen The Board began its opinion with a ... and it refused to consider the late evidentiary submissions. As to the specimens of use, Examining Attorney April K. Roach advised Honda that the original specimen [above] was unacceptable because ACURA and RL "appear as separate marks." Honda submitted a substitute specimen ...
The TTABlog - http://thettablog.blogspot.com
13 Mar 4:00 am
... (Inventive Step) (Patent Prospector) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Patent contributor not 'co-inventor': Natron v Schukra and Borg Indak (Law360) (Patent Prospector) CAFC ... , Flexsys files motion to reopen case against Sinorgchem, KKPC and Kumho Tire Co in district court (Law360) Honeywell International - Honeywell, Cree, Boston University drop LED ... autos, finding ACURA and RL too far apart on specimens: In re Honda Motor Co, Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB questionably shows second red card ...
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/blog
21 Mar, 2008 5:00 am
... mark shown next below, registered and previously used by Honda for motorcycles. Honda Motor Co., Ltd. v. Dakota Motorcycles USA Inc., Opposition No. ... third-party uses a similar design mark on similar goods. As the 5th factor, Honda failed to establish that its mark is famous, but the Board did find the mark to be a strong ... speed." Of course, Opposer's mark would be pronounced "Viking Motorcycles," while Honda's mark contains no pronounceable words. However, the connotations of the marks are "quite ...
The TTABlog - http://thettablog.blogspot.com
19 Mar, 2008 7:03 am by Dan Markel
... 95 Eng. Rep. 768 (K.B). See also Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Haslip, 499 U.S. 1, 24 (1991) (Scalia, J., ... negligence" but its definition approximates what is elsewhere called malice or recklessness. See Gen. Motors Corp. v. Sanchez, 997 S.W.2d 584, 595 ( Tex. ... , 562 (1996) (Breyer, J., concurring). [13] State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Campbell, 538 U.S. 408, 419 (2003). This analysis proceeds by ... case. [18] State Farm, 538 U.S. at 421. [19] Honda Motor Co., Ltd. v. Oberg, 512 U.S. 415, 432 (1994). ...
PrawfsBlawg - http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/
24 Jun 11:04 pm by John L. Welch
... . Trademark (Lanham) Act," 99 Trademark Reporter 763 (May-June 2009). Sandra Edelman The Board's recent decision in Honda Motor Co., Ltd. v. Friedrich Winkelmann, 90 USPQ2d 1660 (TTAB 2009) [precedential], brought the bona fide intent issue to the forefront for many trademark practitioners. [TTABlogged here]. There the Board sustained Honda's opposition to Herr Winkelmann's Section 44(e) application to register the mark V.I.C. for vehicles, ruling ...
The TTABlog - http://thettablog.blogspot.com
8 Jul 8:36 am by Bill Heinze
... 763 (May-June 2009). According to the TTABlog, the U.S. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board's recent decision in Honda Motor Co., Ltd. v. Friedrich Winkelmann, 90 USPQ2d 1660 (TTAB 2009) [precedential], brought the bona fide intent issue to the forefront for many trademark practitioners. There the Board sustained Honda's opposition to Herr Winkelmann's Section 44(e) application to register the mark V.I.C. for vehicles, ruling on summary ...
I/P Updates - http://ip-updates.blogspot.com
28 Feb, 2008 10:42 am
... become a significant substantive check on punitive damages awards. (See, e.g., Honda Motor Co. Ltd. v. Oberg (1994) 512 U.S. 415, 432 [114 S.Ct. 2331, 129 L.Ed.2d 336]; Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Haslip (1991) 499 U.S. 1, 18, 20, 21-22 [ ... .Ct. 1678, 149 L.Ed.2d 674]; State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Campbell (2003) 538 U.S. 408, 418 [123 S.Ct. ... the post-BMW environment, and there is a nationwide split of authority. (See Birmingham News Co. v. Horn (Ala. 2004) 901 So.2d 27, 66 [holding that ...
California Punitive Damages - http://calpunitives.blogspot.com/
1 Oct 11:06 pm by John L. Welch
... ) of the Trademark Act, unless other facts are presented which adequately explain or outweigh applicant's failure to provide such documentary evidence. See Commodore Electronics Ltd. v. CBM Kabushiki Kaisha, 26 USPQ2d 1503, 1507 (TTAB 1993), cited in Honda Motor Co., Ltd. v. Friedrich Winkelmann, 90 USPQ2d 1660, 1662 (TTAB 2009). See also Boston Red Sox Baseball Club LP v. Sherman, 88 USPQ2d 1581 ...
The TTABlog - http://thettablog.blogspot.com
1 Nov, 2007 4:56 am
... of confusion with Petitioner's mark (shown second below) for "retail stores featuring clothing, fishing supplies and sporting goods," and on the ground of fraud. Respondent asserts the affirmative defense of laches.] November 20, 2007 - 10 AM: In re Honda Motor Co., Ltd., Serial No. 78514746 [Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark RL for "automobiles and structural parts thereof" in view of the mark ...
The TTABlog - http://thettablog.blogspot.com
7 Mar, 2008 9:49 am
... , but approving an 87:1 ratio in light of the defendant's "particularly egregious acts"); Lakin v. Senco Prods., Inc., 987 P.2d 463, 476 (Or. 1999) (affirming $4 million punitive damage award in product liability action) Oberg v. Honda Motor Co., Ltd., 888 P.2d 8, 14 (Or. 1995) (affirming punitive damages award after U.S. Supreme Court had reversed and remanded for excessiveness review). Is anyone aware of ...
California Punitive Damages - http://calpunitives.blogspot.com/
        Next >
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck