Search for: "Inphonics"
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe:  20 results  |  100 results
22 Nov, 2006 8:50 am by Michael J. Hassen
... of the Federal Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). The class action claims were based on InPhonic's alleged failure to adequately disclose the rebate conditions associated with the purchase of wireless telephones and service ... appropriate transferee court, explaining: This district is where many relevant documents and witnesses are likely to be found, inasmuch as InPhonic's headquarters and related offices are located in the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area. Further, ...
Class Action Defense Blog - http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/
30 Apr, 2007 9:56 am by Elaine Schallock
... making deceptive claims and engaging in unfair practices in connection with its rebate offers. According to the FTC, in advertising its rebates InPhonic failed to disclose adequately prior to purchase that, among other things, consumers would have to wait at ... least six to nine months after their purchase to get their rebate. In addition, the FTC alleged that InPhonic misrepresented that consumers would be able to resubmit failed (incomplete) requests for rebates and failed to provide consumers ...
Reasonable Basis - http://www.reasonablebasis.com/
31 May, 2007 8:21 am by Thomas Hughes
... financing and service contracts should examine their practices in light of recent enforcement actions involving DirecTV, CompUSA, InPhonic, Kmart, Darden, and Dell. In the eyes of the Commission and the AGs, companies are on notice of what constitutes a deceptive ... to address them through enforcement. In the twelve months before the Commission's action regarding the rebate practices of InPhonic and Soyo, over a dozen states introduced legislation that would impose restrictions on rebates. At the ...
Reasonable Basis - http://www.reasonablebasis.com/
26 Mar, 2008 1:40 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
... was a deceptive practice. Result: $3.5-5 million in consumer redress. Rebates: FTC had a workshop on the subject. Soyo: ads said rebate checks would come in 10-12 weeks, but the 90-95% of consumers didn't get their money within that time. InPhonic: consumers who turned in their rebate materials "too early" - company set up the rebate so that consumers had to wait 3-6 months to file. The effect on "breakage" as the industry calls it was profound. If they sent in claims before that, their rebates ...
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/index.html
         
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck