Search for: "John Doe No. 1"
Results 1 - 20 of 3,559
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
17 Nov, 2007 1:38 pm
... genetic pre-disposition, exposure to toxic chemicals in the workplace, stress and the like. John Doe's Alleged Vioxx-Related Heart Attack In negotiating the settlement of litigation, ... and marketing a product we ingest to help make us better. I mean,
no one was taking Vioxx as a recreational drug, right? Here's what Nocera says ... her children the opportunity to prove that it was not genes or mold in the men's room at
John's workplace or an early exposure to toxic chemicals in the oil town in which he ...
13 Nov, 2007 7:35 am
United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 01-3624 JOHN DOE,
Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF LAFAYETTE, INDIANA, Defendant-Appellee. ____________ ... admitted to peeping into windows of an apartment of a female at 1:20 a.m. In 1986, Mr. Doe admitted to masturbating in full view of three children who lived in the home next ...
just happens. Ahh." Reed Aff. Ex.F. In May of 1990, Mr. Doe was arrested for public intoxication and resisting law enforcement following a
report that he ...
15 Apr, 2008 5:16 am
... seeking to obtain the identity of students at the University of Maine, Atlantic v. Does 1-14. John Doe #10 has made motions to (a) strike the declaration of Carlos Linares ... degree of prematurity." Plaintiffs
failed the first two parts of the test. They offered no admissible evidence to allow the Court to determine that they would suffer irreparable harm ... and ending on October 31?
They waited because they knew there was no urgency. They probably knew the University System would not destroy records ...
19 Apr, 2008 6:13 am
... to any basis for joinder under Fed. R. Civ. P. 20, dismissed as to all John Does except John Doe #1, and ordered the RIAA to file separate new cases against each
of the ... the complaint, or the plaintiffs' showing of a need for ex parte discovery. [Ed. note. How many times does this have to happen before the courts start awarding
sanctions against the RIAA's attorneys? The RIAA attorneys have NO NON-FRIVOLOUS ARGUMENT for why they should be joining these defendants. They have simply been taking ...
12 Mar, 2008 11:25 am
... , LaFace v. Does 1-38, the judge dismissed the case as to all John Does except
Doe Number 2, due to the fact that there was no basis for joining the ... in a single lawsuit. As it turns out, according to a report
from Technician Online, "John Doe #2" doesn't actually exist: Students win first battle with RIAA
Judge rules ... except for one, noting that lawsuit as one individual lawsuit. But that lawsuit, labeled Doe No. 2, cannot be found by
the ResNet. Typically, the University is able to locate each ...
11 Dec, 2008 3:03 am
... A. Matanic, Shawn R. McCall, R. David Arthur II Opinion Summary: John Doe pleaded guilty to the
public display of explicit sexual material in May 2004, ... law in violation of article I, section 13 of the state constitution. Here, because Doe had no obligation to register at the time he pleaded guilty, the constitution prohibits requiring ... sexual material were required to register as
a sex offender. Section 589.400.1(2), RSMo Supp. 2005. Subsequently, a probation violation report was filed against ...
26 Sep, 2007 7:38 pm
... v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY et al. CALKINS, J. [¶1] John Doe
appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Studstrup, J.) granting Evert ... amended complaint states that since the sex offense conviction, he has had
no arrests or convictions for sexual offenses, and he has not abused drugs ... and the risk assessment require findings of fact that must be found by a jury. [¶6] Doe filed a motion for a temporary restraining order and a supporting affidavit to prohibit the defendants ...
20 Apr, 2008 1:41 pm
... appears that the subpoena response of the University of Arizona in LaFace v. Does 1-14 (Phoenix, AZ) was turned over one day after
John Doe #3 had filed a motion to quash the subpoena, and on the same day that John Doe #8 joined in John Doe
#3's motion. We have no idea how this happened, but it would seem that (a ... subpoena had been filed, and (b) the motions to quash aren't going to be of much use to
John Does #3 and #8, since their identities have already been disclosed. Hopefully we ...
30 Jun 5:26 am
/**/ Zynga Game Network, Inc. v. John Does 1-50 United States District Court for N.D. Cal.
Case No. 3:09-cv-02744-BZ, Filed ... gaming company, has filed yet another lawsuit. Much like its suit against John Does
1-5, Zynga is again going after website operators infringing on its ZYNGA trademark. This ... real world money, an act that Zynga's Terms of
Service expressly forbid. The defendants are unnamed "John Does" for the time being because they "registered their domain names using
the Domain by Proxy ...
18 Jan 3:39 am
... . We have just learned that the RIAA's "John Doe" case targeting University of Michigan students,
LaFace Records v. Does 1-7, has been dropped, without ... makes the third such case of which we are aware, the other two being Arista v.
Does 1-22, targeting Rhode Island College students, and BMG Music v. ... 1-14, targeting
students at North Carolina State and UNC-Charlotte. We have no information as to whether this news is or is not related to the 3 investigative proceedings before Michigan's
Department ...
2 Apr, 2008 1:58 am
... won in State v. Belt, No. 95,575 (Kan. March 28, 2008), affirming dismissal orders in three counties involving "John Doe" warrants, warrants based on DNA ... . We do not disagree with this proposition in the abstract. But this case is concrete. Here, neither the
John Doe warrants nor the affidavits supporting them set forth the unique DNA profile of their
subject. . . . . Moreover, as Belt notes, there was no reason the State could not have particularly described the perpetrator's unique DNA profile ...
9 Jun 4:30 am
... Zynga Game Network, Inc. v. John Does 1-5 United States District Court for N.D. Cal. Case
No.: 3:09-cv-02441-CRB ... users. Zynga filed the complaint against the registrants (of currently unknown identity, thus the John
Doe aliases) of the website domain name zyngachips.com for trademark infringement and unfair ... Zynga claims that the domain name is
confusingly similar to the ZYNGA mark since it has no relation to Zynga and instead goes to a website that advertises for and/or hyperlinks to a variety ...
29 May, 2008 10:34 am
... has commenced yet another case targeting University of Maine Students, BMG v. Does 1-11. Like all other "John Doe" cases brought by the RIAA, it was brought ex parte. This time, however, the judge declined to sign the
proposed ex parte discovery order, noting that I see no reason for the ... to show cause for Rule 11 sanctions against the plaintiffs and their lawyers in Arista v. Does
1-27. Order Reserving Decision on ex parte discovery application* * Document published online at ...
4 Jun 9:29 am
Zynga Game Network, Inc. v. John Does 1-5United States District Court for N.D. Cal.Case
No.: 3:09-cv-02441-CRB, Filed 6/2/09 Zynga Game Network, whose settlement with CLZ Concepts we just commented on, hasn't wasted any time in jumping into another lawsuit. On June
2, 2009, Zynga brought a trademark infringement suit against John Does 1-5. We are obtaining
the complaint and will update this post once we've had a chance to review it. We'll keep you updated as we get more information.
1 Jun 6:30 am
The US Government petitioned for the enforcement of John Doe Summons, and UBS Bank of Switzerland has
responded in opposition. UBS brief in opposition claims that there is clash between US laws and laws of Switzerland. The ... and Article 47 of the Federal Act on Banks and Savings
Banks. In this regard, Article 26(3) of the Tax Treaty states: In no case shall the provisions of this Article be construed so as to impose upon either of the Contracting States
the obligation to carry out administrative ...
28 Feb, 2008 5:56 am
... who challenged Indiana's residency restriction will not be able to return home because he has no rights to the property, a Tippecanoe County judge ruled. The man filed a
civil complaint in August, under the alias John B. Doe, fighting a recent state law that ...
conviction and sentence came before enactment of the law. Indiana's law took effect on July 1, 2006. "Under the circumstances, the court finds
that injunctive relief forbidding the prosecutor and sheriff from enforcing ...
2 Oct, 2007 7:45 pm
... has to give himself injections 3 times a day. He was living in Albany for 4 1/2 years with no problems when his building was sold
and everyone was evicted last May. He' ... the police told him he had to leave by next week. His new parole officer is no help. This man has given the police over 30 different
addresses to check and they have ... is in the excluded zone. They told him to try a couple areas of the city where there is no housing available to him. So he has been trying to
do everything right, but ...
16 Nov, 2007 2:06 am
... COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION MICHAEL ANTHONY TAYLOR ) ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) No. 05-4173-CV-C-FJG ) LARRY CRAWFORD, et al., ) ) Defendants. ...
05-cv-04173-FJG Document 213 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 1 of 4 2 (1958)). As to executions, it prohibits "the unnecessary and wanton infliction of
pain" ... the State's revised protocol is an improvement over the previous procedures used by John Doe No. 1, it falls short of providing the critical Constitutional protections required. It was never ...
14 Oct, 2007 10:05 pm
... -related cases filed in the the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland during the week beginning October 1, 2007 (source:
Justia), beginning with an IP NIMBY case: Invenergy Wind North America LLC v. John Doe Numbers
1 Through 10, 07civ02643, filed Oct. 1, 2007. According to ... military, military special forces, and
law enforcement activities," among other uses. It also owns U.S. Patent No. 7,039,195 ("Ear Terminal") and U.S. Patent No. 6,567,524 ("Noise ...
13 Mar 8:29 am
... had been online for more than the usual one-year limitation period for defamation suits. [Case of Times Newspapers Ltd (Nos. 1 And
2) v. The United Kingdom] Though the limitation period runs from publication, each time a web site is accessed is considered a new publication. Thus the limitation period never expires
for an online publication. Does this make sense? (Out-law.com, a publication of the Pinsents law firm in the UK, does not think so.) On the other hand, ...
Search on: Blawgs.FM | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blog Search | Technorati | Google | MSN | Yahoo!