Search for: "John Does 1, 2, and 3"
Results 1 - 20 of 1,896
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
4 Jun 9:29 am
Zynga Game Network, Inc. v. John Does 1-5United States District Court for N.D. Cal.Case No.:
3:09-cv-02441-CRB, Filed 6/2/09 Zynga Game Network, whose settlement with CLZ Concepts we just commented on, hasn't wasted any time in
jumping into another lawsuit. On June 2, 2009, Zynga brought a trademark infringement suit against John Does 1-5. We are obtaining the complaint and will update this post once we've had a chance to review it. We'll keep you updated as we get more
information.
9 Jun 4:30 am
... . John Does 1-5 United States District Court for N.D. Cal. Case No.: 3:09-cv-02441-CRB, Filed 6/2/09 ... against the registrants (of currently unknown identity, thus the John
Doe aliases) of the website domain name zyngachips.com for trademark infringement and unfair competition. Zynga has been ... defendants are liable because the ZYNGA mark
is distinctive, zyngachips.com is confusingly similar to that mark, and the defendants had a bad faith intent to profit from using the mark. California statutory ...
9 Apr, 2008 4:56 am
... 3, 2008), targeting students at Carnegie-Mellon University, a student (John Doe
#3), appearing pro se, lost her motion to quash the subpoena, but won her motion for ... , by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan, dismissed the
case as to John Does 1-2, and 4-9, and ordered the RIAA to commence 8
separate proceedings against each ... are not tax deductible.-->freejammie.com or by check, payable to "Jammie Thomas Defense Fund", and mailed to Jammie Thomas Defense Fund
c/o Chestnut & Cambronne Suite ...
9 Mar, 2007 6:37 am
... the RIAA improperly joins unrelated "John Doe" defendants, we thought this an appropriate juncture to remind lawyers of the Order in
federal court in Austin, Texas, in Fonovisa v. Does 1-41, and 3 other cases, under
caption "In re Cases Filed by Recording Companies", which ordered the RIAA to cease and desist from that practice, but which the RIAA has simply ignored for the past 2
1/2 years, just in case anyone's thinking of making a contempt motion: November 17, 2004, Order, ...
12 Jan, 2007 2:36 pm
... ; Foerster represented the so-called American Taliban, John Walker Lindh (and thereby brought honor on themselves and the
bar, in my view). The Association of the Bar of the City of ... , here's the rule subparagraph and the pertinent comments: 1.2(b) A lawyer's representation of a
client, including representation by appointment, does not constitute an endorsement of ... lawyer's oath, which came to us via centuries-old
Swiss and French lawyers guild oaths, which were translated almost word for word into ...
7 Sep, 2007 10:43 am
... between the parties is enforceable under Ind. Code § 26-1-2-201(3)(a) because the website was specially modified for POA
and is not suitable for sale to others in the ordinary course ... . The parties' failure to establish price at the time of the agreement does not render the contract unenforceable. Ind. Code § 26-1-2-305 governs contracts in which the price is ... Henderson v. State of Indiana
(NFP) Dale Mundy v. State of Indiana (NFP) John Taylor v. State of Indiana (NFP) Ronnie E. Polk v. State of ...
12 Mar, 2008 11:25 am
... , North Carolina, LaFace v. Does 1-38, the judge dismissed the case as to all John
Does except Doe Number 2, due to the fact that there was no basis ... a set of lawsuits dished out by the Recording Industry Josh
Harrell Issue date: 3/12/08 Section: News In the first public fight against the Recording Industry Association ... eight students won a motion
to quash on Feb. 27, as a judge ruled to drop the lawsuits. And on Monday, Greensboro attorney Stephen Robertson filed a second motion to quash with four ...
26 Sep, 2007 7:38 pm
... CALKINS, J. [¶1] John Doe appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Studstrup, J.) granting
Evert Fowle, Craig Poulin, and Everett ... informed of the registration requirements when he entered his guilty plea; (2) procedural due process because SORNA is
unconstitutionally vague; (3) substantive due process because ... M.R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Prior to the argument on the motions, Doe
registered as a sex offender. ..more.. by Maine Supreme CourtSex Offender Research, Recidivism ...
22 Dec, 2007 5:20 am
... parte litigation campaign against the nation's college and university campuses. In Arista v. Does 1-27, where eight
University of Maine students are being represented by Bob ... Judicial Appointments. Both the eight students represented by Mr. Mittel's firm, and the two students represented by
the student attorneys at Cumberland Legal Aid Clinic, submitted ... motion to dismiss complaint* Reply Memorandum on behalf of "John
Does 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 15, 22, and 23" in support of motion to dismiss complaint ...
30 Apr 2:30 am
... portion of the relevant consumers be deceived." [Emphasis supplied]. Here the court held that "subsection (e)(3) does incorporate such a requirement, and that the appropriate inquiry for materiality purposes is whether a substantial portion of the relevant
consumers is ... non-Russian speaking Americans drink vodka (judicial notice, anyone?) and that a substantial portion of them will perceive the mark MOSKOVSKAYA as indication
that the vodka originates in Moscow. Text Copyright John L. Welch 2009.
5 Jun, 2007 4:45 pm
... state what Ashcroft's views were. So why did Ashcroft do what he did? 1. Because legally he was not the Attorney general; he did not have the legal authority ... he either
would not comment or redirected. (at 2:22 and 3:10) On thing Ashcroft is able to answer is how necessary it is to protect our
security, but he does not discuss the cost to ... ; it is simply not part of his calculus. So, no, I don't think John Ashcroft was doing the Constitution any favors that night in intensive care, but PD Dude has a ...
21 Oct, 2008 11:00 am
... 2(e)(3) claim, the pertinent elements were set out in In re California Innovations Inc., 66 USPQ2d 1853, 1856-57 (Fed. Cir. 2003):
(1) ... goods/place association exists), when in fact the goods do not come from that place; and (3) the misrepresentation would
be a material factor in the consumer's decision to purchase the goods. ... products with Havana "undoubtedly would be material" to the purchasing decision. The Board therefore affirmed
the Section 2(e)(3) refusal. Text Copyright John L. Welch 2008. ...
28 Dec, 2007 4:56 am
... of the mark is a generally known geographic location; (2) the consuming public is likely to believe that the goods originate in that location (i.e., a goods-place association
exists), when in fact the goods do not, and (3) the misrepresentation would be material to the consumer's ... presumption be that
Wikipedia evidence is not trustworthy unless corroborated? And if corroborated, why not just rely on the corroborating evidence, and forget the Wikipedia evidence? Text
Copyright John L. Welch 2007.
3 Aug, 2007 10:37 am
... for nonsupport of a dependent child, a Class C felony, Ind. Code § 35-46-1-5(a). Judge Riley concludes: For the following reasons, we finally conclude that Turner - ...
saving clause to exclude the doctrine of amelioration from applying; (2) the new statute does have an ameliorative effect in Turner's
case; and (3) the full intent of the legislature cannot be ... criminal opinions today (11): William Tyrone Thomas v. State of Indiana
(NFP) John Crump v. State of Indiana (NFP) Eric Justin Dove v. State of ...
14 Jul 6:06 pm
... DiBianca elaborate on three reasons an employer might not: (1) ignorance; (2) committee approval delays; and (3) hopes
that the social networking phenomenon will simply go ... 's job. Employment Claims. You don't want to hear this, "Well John Doe has been
doing it for weeks/months/years so why are you ... discrimination." Having a written policy in place clearly tells every employee what is allowed and what is not allowed. This
provides a sound basis to prevent a discrimination claim. Trade Secrets. ...
2 Oct, 2007 7:45 pm
... going to sue Albany County because a man who had contacted me is being forced from his home and they're only giving him until next week. He is a level 3 but has ... he has to give himself injections 3 times a day. He was living in Albany for 4 1/2 years
with no problems when his building was sold and everyone was evicted last May. ... officer is no help. This man has given the police over 30 different addresses to check
and they have told him that every one of them is in the excluded zone. They told him ...
15 Feb, 2008 10:37 am
... than three (3) grams." Appellant's App. at 10. (Emphasis Supplied). The evidence reflected that Reinhardt delivered cocaine to
John May who in turn, and not in Reinhardt' ... 's employment status. In addition, the order issued will also provide that, when Wife
does retire, she and Husband will each receive an equal share of the sum of their retirement ... am compelled to concur with the
majority's decision to reverse and remand. NFP criminal opinions today (1): James S. Furnifur v. State of Indiana (NFP ...
10 Jul, 2007 11:49 am
... show clear intent to benefit Green as Green is neither named in the purchase agreement nor does the purchase agreement contain "provisions
which demonstrate an intent to benefit any other person ... opinions today (1): Alan Kearns and Technology & Network Specialists v. Technology & Network Services
and John Payne and Robert Wallace ( ... TN Specialists for breach of contract in the amount of $6,500." NFP criminal opinions
today (2): Jessica F. Sargent v. State of Indiana (NFP) Kari A. Fulton v. ...
23 May, 2008 11:17 am
... T]he mere fact that the same action is being prosecuted simultaneously in two Indiana courts does not implicate jurisdictional concerns. As
such, a party involved in the same action in two Indiana ... other words, Irmscher never challenged the trial court's subject matter and personal jurisdiction.3 Likewise, Irmscher never filed either a motion to dismiss pursuant to ... NFP criminal opinions today (17): Brent Bailey v. State of Indiana (NFP)
John T. Mann v. State of Indiana (NFP) Carl Boards v. State of ...
10 Mar 12:11 am
... and alternatively found that it fails to function as a mark, under Sections 1, 2, and 45. In re UDOR U.S.A., Inc., 89 USPQ2d 1978 (TTAB 2009) [ ... value
based upon the claims of the patented technology." In short, what is shown in the trademark drawing does not "serve a function within the terms
of the utility patent." While it is true that all the ... "Trade Dress at the TTAB: If Functionality Don't Get You, Nondistinctiveness Will," still resonates five years later. Text
Copyright John L. Welch 2009
Search on: Blawgs.FM | BlawgSearch Google Co-op |
Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blog Search |
Technorati | Google | MSN | Yahoo!