Search for: "John Does I V"
Results 1 - 20 of 3,373
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
26 Sep, 2007 7:38 pm
... : Ken-06-757 Argued: May 23, 2007 Decided: September 25, 2007 JOHN DOE v. DISTRICT
ATTORNEY et al. CALKINS, J. [¶1] ... and the risk assessment require findings of fact that must be found by a jury. [¶6] Doe filed a motion for a temporary restraining order and
a supporting affidavit to prohibit the defendants from ... a minor before 1993. [¶7] The court denied the temporary restraining order, finding that Doe failed to show a
likelihood of success on the merits. Thereafter, Fowle, Poulin, and Flannery ...
13 Nov, 2007 7:35 am
... Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 01-3624 JOHN DOE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF LAFAYETTE, INDIANA, Defendant-Appellee. ____________ Appeal from the United ... and asked the boy to unzip his pants; after the boy refused, Mr.
Doe unzipped the boy's pants and performed oral sex on him. In 1985 ... now come to the incident that precipitated the situation before us. In January of 2000, Mr. Doe's
probation officer, Joe Hooker, received a call from a "confidential source," informing ...
30 Dec, 2008 7:35 am
... .S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has today issued its ruling in John Doe v.
SexSearch.com: The opinion begins: Pseudonymous plaintiff John Doe appeals the dismissal of his complaint against defendant,
SexSearch.com ("SexSearch"), an ... SexSearch, alleging an array of violations under Ohio law, most of which are variations on the claim that SexSearch is at fault for Doe's
sexual relationship with a minor and the harm that resulted from his arrest. In summarizing today's holding, the court ...
2 Oct, 2007 7:45 pm
View the Court Case Here 10/02/2007 Sent in via the "Submit your news article here" link above. I recommend EVERYONE faced with this BS to SUE, SUE, SUE! Kathy Manley, the lead attorney
in the case described the action in an informal e-mail: We are going to sue Albany County because a man who had contacted me is being forced from his home and they're only giving him
until next week. He is a level 3 but has only ever been convicted of one sex offense (against a 14 year old girl) and his crime ...
9 May, 2007 7:21 am
... denied transfer last week was the 10/31/06 ruling in Flying J., Inc. v. City of New Haven, Board of Zoning Appeals. This ILB entry from
Nov. 6, 2006 ... 187 trucks. Another case followed in the ILB and denied transfer last week was John Doe v. Town of Plainfield, Indiana . In this Feb. 13, 2007 entry titled "Sealed documents in otherwise 'unsealed' cases", the ILB wrote about the fact that the
entire docket in the John Doe case was unavailable online, although only an exhibit had been sealed, and ...
27 Nov, 2007 5:28 pm
Making a mockery out of the use of John Doe: A reader based in New York City emails: Here's one to appeal to your intrepid reporter
streak. A Ninth Circuit opinion posted today is captioned John Doe v. Jeanne S. Woodford, et
al., No. 06-16154. It is, however, the substituted opinion for an earlier decision, Craig Clifford Busch v. Jeanne S. Woodford, et al., also
bearing No. 06-16154, originally filed Aug. 29, 2007, and withdrawn on November 13 ...
17 Apr, 2006 7:52 pm
Last month, the documentary film Total Denial won the the Vaclav Havel Award at the One World International Human Rights Documentary Film Festival. The movie details the story of the
Doe v. Unocal lawsuit. The lawsuit was brought on behalf of Burmese citizens harmed by the Yadana pipeline project (a joint venture of
Total, Unocal and the Burmese government). Last year, the parties entered into a settlement agreement resolving the case.
23 Jan, 2008 6:26 pm
... violent predators was compelling; nevertheless, 2) subjecting out-of state sex offenders to community notification without providing equivalent procedural safeguards as given to
in-state sex offenders was not rationally related to that goal. See the court decision: JOHN DOE -v- THE PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE; STATE POLICE COMMISSIONER JEFFREY B. MILLER; APPOINTED BOARD CHAIR CATHERINE C. MCVEYSex Offender ...
1 Dec, 2007 10:28 am
In Arista v. Does 1-9, the Columbus, Ohio, case targeting Ohio State University, where three
defendants --John Does #1, 5, and #9 -- have made ... #5 Motion for Stay* November 29, 2007, Order
Granting Stay of Subpoena* The motion by John Doe #1 was posted previously. * Document published online at Internet Law & ... may
wish to make financial contributions to Ms. Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. Lindor. Contributions are not tax deductible.-->freejammie.com
or by check, payable to "Jammie Thomas ...
10 Jun, 2008 3:22 pm
... Doe" case against 38 different "John Does", LaFace v. Does 1-38, targeting North Carolina State University students, which was dismissed as to all but one ... Board's
staff that such activities violate the Private Protective Services Act. Warner v. Doe Motion to Dismiss, Strike, and Quash* Brief*
Robertson Affidavit with Exhibit, ... of North Carolina Private Protective Services Board* Proposed Stay Order* SONY v. Doe Motion*
(Similar papers filed in support) * Document published online at Internet Law ...
20 Sep, 2007 5:26 am
... RIAA's campaign against college students, this one by a "John Doe" who is a student at North Carolina State University, in LaFace
v. Does 1-38. The student has until October ... Robertson, of Robertson, Medlin & Blocker, and is
looking for other NC State "John Does" to join him and share expenses. This is the 5th motion of
which we ... wish to make financial contributions to Ms. Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. Lindor. Contributions are not tax
deductible.-->Motion for Extension of Time* Order ...
14 Mar, 2008 2:21 am
... 07-CV-00405. As in LaFace v. Does 1-38, which preceded it, a number of defendants -- this time
four of them known only as John Does #13, 16, 17, ... are represented by Stephen Robertson of
Robertson & Medlin in Greensboro, North Carolina. Brief of John Does 13, 16, 17, and 19 in
support of motion to dismiss or sever* ... may wish to make financial contributions to Ms. Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. Lindor.
Contributions are not tax deductible.-->freejammie.com or by check, payable to "Jammie ...
19 Apr, 2008 6:13 am
... been dismissed for improper joinder of unrelated John Does, this time in the case targeting Ohio
State University students, Arista v. Does 1-9, in Columbus, Ohio ... Order and Opinion of Magistrate
Judge Mark R. Abel, dismissing complaint as to John Does 2-9* * Document published online at Internet
Law & RegulationCommentary ... wish to make financial contributions to Ms. Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. Lindor. Contributions are not
tax deductible.-->freejammie.com or by check, payable to "Jammie ...
11 Dec, 2008 3:03 am
... -12-2007 Missouri: Opinion Supreme Court of Missouri Case Style: John Doe, Appellant v.
Honorable Matt Blunt, et al., Respondents. Case Number: ... offender pursuant to section 589.400.1(2), RSMo Supp. 2005. When Doe failed to register, he was charged with violating
probation. He sought a judgment declaring ... been deferred pending resolution of this case. Because of the possibility of probation revocation, the issue of Doe's duty to
register is not moot. ..News Source.. by . The Truth from: Sex Offender ...
12 Mar, 2008 11:25 am
... students in Raleigh, North Carolina, LaFace v. Does 1-38, the judge dismissed the case as to all
John Does except Doe Number 2, due to the fact ... except for one, noting that lawsuit as one
individual lawsuit. But that lawsuit, labeled Doe No. 2, cannot be found by the ResNet. Typically, the University is able to locate each ... wish to make financial contributions
to Ms. Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. Lindor. Contributions are not tax deductible.-->freejammie.com or by check, payable to "Jammie ...
15 Apr, 2008 5:16 am
... case seeking to obtain the identity of students at the University of Maine, Atlantic v. Does
1-14. John Doe #10 has made motions to (a) strike the declaration of Carlos ... considerations determine whether there should be an
exception to Rule 26(f). McMann v. Doe, 460 F. Supp. 2d 259, 265 (D. Mass. 2006). ... System will loose or destroy the information we
need to identify and then serve the Doe defendants as identifiable defendants". That is just false. This is at least the 3rd case brought by these ...
20 Apr, 2008 1:41 pm
... the subpoena response of the University of Arizona in LaFace v. Does 1-14 (Phoenix, AZ) was
turned over one day after John Doe #3 had filed a motion to quash ... had been filed, and (b) the motions to quash aren't going to be of
much use to John Does #3 and #8, since their identities have already been disclosed. ... who may wish
to make financial contributions to Ms. Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. Lindor. Contributions are not tax deductible.-->freejammie.com or by
check, payable to "Jammie Thomas ...
22 Jan, 2007 9:28 am
... " case, BMG v. Does 1-4, the Court refused to accept joinder of the four John Does, and dismissed as to John Does 2-4: August 1, ... facie case, and ordered the plaintiffs to produce copies of the copyright registrations allegedly infringed by John Doe number 1. After receiving plaintiffs' new papers, including the copyright registations ... subsequently granted the ex parte discovery order
the RIAA was seeking, but only as to John Doe number 1: November 30, 2006, decision* This was a totally ex parte ...
1 Apr, 2008 11:18 am
... filed a Rule 11 motion based on: --the RIAA's use of the ex parte "John Doe" procedure to circumvent student privacy right under the
Family Educational Rights ... seeks: --an injunction against the practice of bringing the "John Doe" actions; --monetary fines; and
--dismissal with prejudice of Arista v. Does 1-27. Rule 11 motion ... wish to make financial
contributions to Ms. Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. Lindor. Contributions are not tax deductible.-->freejammie.com or by check, payable to
"Jammie ...
4 Jul, 2008 1:26 pm
... has issued a ruling indicating that she is going to take a "fresh look" at the RIAA's John Doe cases, and has stayed the subpoena
which the RIAA served upon the ... pending decision on remaining motions. While motion to dismiss was raised on behalf of defendants denominated as Does #1,#18, #19, #26, #31, #33, #35, and #38, and denied, ... Lindor's family for people who may wish to make financial contributions to Ms. Lindor's legal
defense in UMG v. Lindor. Contributions are not tax deductible.-->
Search on: Blawgs.FM | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blog Search | Technorati | Google | MSN | Yahoo!