Search for: "Medela, Inc."
Results 1 - 7 of 7
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
18 Aug 8:58 am
Medela AG v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc. (petition for a writ of certiorari) Question presented: Whether a person accused of patent infringement has a right to independent
judicial, as distinct from lay jury, determination of whether an asserted patent claim satisfies the "non-obvious subject matter" condition for patentability. Medela defended
against allegations of patent infringement by arguing that the asserted patent was invalid for obviousness. The district court provided the jury ...
28 Aug 6:56 am
The Supreme Court has been asked to hear the case of Medela AG v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc. to decide this question. In its petition for certiorari to the Supreme Court,
Medela argues that the Court has long held that "[t]he ultimate judgment of obviousness is a legal determination." Yet, Federal Circuit precedent permits the jury to make [...]
31 Aug 7:25 pm
... Union Carbide; components of a patented invention not 'methods or processes': Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. v. St. Jude Medical (IP Frontline) (PatLit) District Court N ...
Intellectual Property Law Blog) Supreme Court asked to hear Medela AG v Kinetic Concepts, Inc - Should obviousness be determined by the court or the jury? (Inventive Step)
... refusal of TIANA, finding clothing and jewelry related: In re Disney Enterprises, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB finds NO FRIGGIN CLUE confusingly similar ...
24 Aug 7:01 am
... IP Blog) Supreme Court asked to yank obviousness from the purview of juries: Medela AG v Kinetic Concepts, Inc (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) ...
registered mark SUN-LAND for 'raisins, dried fruits, preserved fruits': In re Sunland Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB finds WOW PRINTABLE COUPONS confusingly similar to ...
HERO applicant lacked bona fide intent: DC Comics and Marvel Characters Inc v Michael Craig Silver (not precedential) (TTABlog) In re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust ...
11 Nov 8:00 am
... Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Docket: 09-198 Title: Medela AG v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc. Issue: Whether a person accused of patent infringement
has a ... , Cisco Systems, Google, Microsoft, et al. Amicus brief of Intel, SAP America, and Shoretel, Inc. Docket: 09-322 Title: Gregory v. Dillard's, Inc. ...
Petitioner's reply Docket: 09-326 Title: Harjo v. Pro-Football, Inc. Issue: Whether the doctrine of laches is applicable to a cancellation petition filed pursuant to Section
1064(3 ...
17 Mar 3:12 pm
... Patent Court in Munich has held the Wake Forest patent for negative pressure (NPWT) licensed to Kinetic Concepts, Inc. invalid in Germany. BUT from yahoofinance: Kinetic
Concepts, Inc. announced March 17 that the German Federal Patent Court has ruled that a German patent licensed to KCI from Wake Forest related to KCI's V.A.C.® technology is
invalid. The validity of the German patent (EP 0620720 (DE 69224847)) is being challenged by Medela, Mölnlycke Health Care AB, and Smith & Nephew plc. ...
20 Aug 6:04 pm
Columbus Post Dispatch CA Arsonist's Relative Accused of Jury Tampering PatentlyO Blog Judge versus Jury: Who Should Decide the Question of Obviousness? ABA Journal Med-Mal Closing
Sickens Juror, Spurring Defendant's Help and New Trial WSAZ-TV Mason County Man Charged with Sending Jurors Threatening Letters Washington Post Ethics Case Against a Top State Appeals
Lawyer Is Thrown Out Vancouver Sun Knowing too much about jurors not always the best
Search on: Blawgs.FM | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blog Search | Technorati | Google | MSN | Yahoo!