Search for: "Medtronic Vascular"
Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
27 Jul 10:45 pm
... , July 27 that it has resolved all outstanding intellectual-property litigation with Abbott Laboratories As part of the agreement, Medtronic will pay $400 milion to Abbott and $42 million to evYsio Medical Devices LLC. The medical-technology company ... As a result, Medtronic will now focus more resources on efforts to improve health care for patients with vascular disease," the
company said in a statement. Medtronic still has a stent-related intellectual property dispute with drug-maker Wyeth (WYE) ...
8 Aug, 2007 11:40 am
... rights a few months later. Dake did not assign his rights until 1996. Medtronic has a US priority filing date of June 1994 on the same
invention. In the interference, the question is ... was filed." (emphasis in original) Notes: This decision [LINK]: Scimed Life Sys., Inc. v. Medtronic Vascular, Inc., - F.3d - (Fed. Cir. 2007). Final BPAI Decision: Patent Interference No. ... A.I. July 21,
2001). Trial Court Decision: Scimed Life Sys., Inc. v. Medtronic Vascular, Inc., 486 F. Supp. 2d 60
(D.D.C. 2006).
10 Sep, 2007 4:07 am
... the 33rd calendar week of 2007. All opinions are precedential unless otherwise indicated. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems v. Medtronic
Vascular (08/13/2007, non-precedential) (order): motion by ACS to dismissal Medronic's appeal as premature, ... infringement and determined
that the patents were not invalid, for which the district court entered a "judgment" in favor of ACS; Medtronic's appeal deemed premature
"because ACS's request for permanent injunctive relief in its complaint remains pending ...
30 Aug, 2007 4:02 am
... opinion) Boston Scientific Scimed (formerly known as Scimed Life Systems) v. Medtronic Vascular
(also known as Medtronic AVE) (08/08/2007): appeal of grant of summary judgment affirming the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences' final
decision denying Scimed the priority benefit ... issue in the patent interference (affirmed); discussion of interference between applications owned by Scimed and Medtronic and U.S. Patent No. 5,575,817, entitled "Aorto femoral bifurcation graft ...
20 Feb 3:00 pm
Medtronic Vascular, Inc. v. Boston Scientific Corp., 2009 WL 383237(E.D.Tex. Feb 11, 2009) (NO.
CIV.A. 2:06-CV-78). Avid Identification ... in patent damages before Judge Ward declared the '326 patent unenforceable due to inequitable conduct. In 2008 Medtronic obtained a $250 jury verdict, which Judge Ward cut by over 90% to $19.09 ... date. (Ed note: I don't think he meant "incredible" in a good way
here). In Medtronic, Judge Ward again recites the basic case facts and notes that he has before him the ...
8 Aug, 2007 9:31 am
Blawgletter doesn't often see elegance in judicial opinions, but we do admire the Federal Circuit's eight-page gem today in Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. v. Medtronic Vascular, Inc., No. 06-1434 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 8, 2007). The court considered which among three patent
applications had priority. One patent owner alleged that a foreign application established its priority. But the district court and the Federal ...
8 Aug, 2007 7:19 am
In Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. v. Medtronic Vascular, Inc. (August 8, 2007), the Federal Circuit
held that "a foreign application may only form the basis for priority under section 119(a) if that application was filed by either the U.S. applicant himself, or by someone acting on
his behalf at the time the foreign application was filed." In other words, "while the foreign application must obviously be for the same invention and may be filed by ...
8 Aug, 2007 12:48 pm
... . This requires at least some "nexus" between the inventor and foreign applicant at the time of filing-the existence of a relationship after the foreign application is filed does
not permit a priority claim if none existed when the application was filed. More detail of Boston Sci. Scimed, Inc. v. Medtronic
Vascular, Inc. after the jump. [More]
6 Nov, 2008 3:08 am
... characteristics. Enzo, 323 F.3d at 964 Alonso had tried a structure-function correlation argument at the CAFC (but not the BPAI), and the argument was NOT considered under the rule
expressed in Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. v. Medtronic Vascular, Inc., 497 F.3d 1293, 1298 (Fed.
Cir. 2007). [Failure to advance legal theories before the [B]oard constitutes a failure to >make a complete presentation of the issues, ] ***See also http://ipbiz ...
27 Feb 7:00 am
... motion to stay: Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC v Dice Electronics, LLC (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas: Settlement not a basis for vacatur of
inequitable conduct findings: Medtronic Vascular, Inc. v. Boston Scientific Corp; Avid Identification
Systems, Inc. v. Philips Semiconductors Inc (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas: 'Good cause' not shown for transfer to Michigan: MHL TEK, LLC v ...
28 Apr 11:09 am
... CEO - AcceleMed Management, Inc. Howard C. Root, Co-founder & CEO - Vascular Solutions Inc. 11:00-11:30 Networking & Refreshment
Break 11:30 ... : Chad Cornell, Vice President, Corporate Development Medtronic, Inc. Ann Hickey, MD, VP, New Business Development Peripheral
Vascular Division - ev3 Inc. Scott R. Miller, ... Keynote Stephen N. Oesterle, M.D. , Senior Vice President for Medicine and Technology
Medtronic, Inc 2:00-3:00 Impact of the Economic Meltdown on Financing Private Device Companies ...
10 Jul, 2008 5:31 pm
... Y.S.2d 807, 809 (N.Y.A.D. 1993). Pennsylvania: Creazzo v. Medtronic, Inc., 903 A.2d 24, 31-32 (Pa. Super. 2006). Tennessee: King ... WL
3021110, at *2 (Va. Cir. Oct. 19, 2006); Hamlett v. Virginia Vascular Associates, 2003 WL 22382792, at *4-5 (Va. Cir. April 21, 2003 ... 1999
WL 716891, at *5 (D. Minn. March 8, 1999); Mozes v. Medtronic, Inc., 14 F. Supp.2d 1124, 1130 (D. Minn. 1998); Kociemba ... Co., 979 F.2d 1001,
1004 (4th Cir. 1992); Brooks v. Medtronic Inc., 750 F.2d 1227, 1231 (4th Cir. 1984). Utah: ...
7 Jan, 2008 6:56 pm
Cordis separately sued Medtronic and Boston Scientific for infringing "patents covering vascular
stents that are used to treat coronary artery disease;" winning both cases. Losers appealed. In the blowup, Cordis had a claim invalidated, so appealed that. All appeals were
consolidated, resulting in one long ruling focused on claim construction and prosecution estoppel.
18 Jul, 2008 8:34 am
... related post by IP Dragon under China) US - Companies / Entities Abbott Laboratories - ByPass sues Abbott over vascular repair patent: (IP
Law360), Advanced Medical Optics - CAFC rules in Advanded Medical Optic's favour in LASIK ... ; SciMed Life Systems: (IP Law360), (Patent Prospector), Boston Scientific - Judge partly
reverses $250M verdict for Medtronic in catheter patent dispute with Boston Scientific: (IP Law360), (EDTexweblog.com), Channel Intelligence -
Channel Intelligence sues numerous ...
22 Mar, 2008 2:00 am
... that MedCom USA's patent for prepaid phone and gift card technology is invalid: (IP Law360), BrainLAB - Although Medtronic's patent suit
was dismisses last year, the company faces a request from BrainLAB to pay $6M for legal fees ... (IP Law360), Cardica - Federal judge refuses to dismiss patent interference suit brought
by Cardica against Integrated Vascular Interventional Technologies over patents covering an apparatus for minimally invasive bypass surgeries:
(IP Law360), Citigroup Credit Services ...
30 Oct, 2008 5:24 pm
... green): "Potential Adverse Events: Although not reported in the clinical study, other potential adverse events which may occur include erosion, implant extrusion through urethral
tissue during injection, necrosis, erythema, embolic phenomena, and vascular occlusion. Erosion, implant extrusion through urethral tissue
during injection and necrosis have been observed during post-approval use of Tegress™ Implant in clinical practice. These adverse events have been noted immediately after injection ...
Search on: Blawgs.FM | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blog Search | Technorati | Google | MSN | Yahoo!