Search for: "Namecheap, Inc."
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
28 May 4:27 pm
By Eric Goldman Solid Host, NL v. NameCheap, Inc., 2:08-cv-05414-MMM-E (C.D. Cal. May 19, 2009) Facts This ... internally inconsistent. In this case, the court's inquiry
is made more difficult by the fact that NameCheap acted as both the registrar and the proxy service provider. As a registrar, an ACPA claim against ... domain name that allegedly
infringes Sold [sic] Host's trademark." Thus, NameCheap is ineligible for the registrar safe harbor, which applies only when the registrar acts as a registrar. ...
25 Oct 12:30 pm
... party beneficiaries. As Professor Goldman previously noted, in Solid Host NL v. NameCheap, Inc. (No. 08-5414) (C.D. Cal. May 19, 2009), ... the person or entity using
the private registration services. Oddly, the court in Balsam cites NameCheap for the proposition that section 3.7.7.3 does not create an intended ... beneficial registrant
'complicated' Balsam's ability to collect against Angeles Technology Inc. Regardless of how the third party beneficiary status discussion plays out, to me this casts ...
8 Oct 4:31 am
... the domain owner had subscribed to WhoIsGuard's identity blocking service, which is owned by NameCheap, Inc. Plaintiffs sent correspondence to NameCheap
requesting the contact information of the registrant or its administrator and received no response. " ... to use and maintain the Website and withhold the identity of the true
registrant and administrator of it." As a result, NameCheap was also named as a defendant in the complaint. The case is Stihl Incorporated v. chainsawsnow.com, CV 09-7171 RGK ...
Search on: Blawgs.FM | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blog Search | Technorati | Google | MSN | Yahoo!