Search for: "Occupational & Medical Innovations, Ltd."
Results 1 - 6 of 6
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe:  20 results  |  100 results
9 Aug, 2008 1:50 am
... mark?: (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) Global - Patents Global science - threat to local innovation?: (Patenting Lives), Worldwide increase in patent filings puts strain on system: (Managing ... (IPRoo), Limited scope for patent non-infringement declarations: Occupational and Medical Innovations Ltd v Retractable Technologies Inc: (Mallesons Stephen Jaques), Finkelstein J ... publishes eco-innovation model grant agreement: (IPR-Helpdesk), EPO Enlarged Board: Rebuff 1/08 (Case no R 0001/08): (IPKat) France ...
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/blog
16 Aug, 2008 2:43 am
... another reason why Australian patent law needs reform: Occupational and Medical Innovations Ltd v Retractable Technologies Inc: (IP Thinktank), Full Federal ... general knowledge for assessing obviousness: Insta Image Pty Ltd v KD Kanopy Australasia Pty Ltd: (Mallesons Stephen Jaques), Federal Court overturns Trade ... Biomedical invalid in dispute over blood glucose monitoring technology: (Law360), Advanced Medical Optics - Inventorship disputes - six-year laches presumption applies despite intermediate ...
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/blog
11 Aug, 2008 3:14 pm
... a court grant you a non-infringement declaration in relation to someone else's patent? A: Australia, of course - have a look at the recent decision in Occupational and Medical Innovations Ltd v Retractable Technologies Inc [2008] FCA 1102. What an unfortunate turn of events this is. This is on top of the already unworkable requirement that the person seeking the declaration of non-infringement must (a) pay the patentee's costs and ...
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/blog
23 Sep, 2008 3:03 pm by Michael Smith
Retractable Technologies, Inc. v. Occupational & Medical Innovations, Ltd., --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2008 WL 4287579(E.D.Tex. Sep 11, 2008) (NO. 6:08CV120) Judge: Leonard Davis Holding: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(5) DENIED This was a dispute over the sufficiency of service on an Australian corporation in a patent case. Plaintiff initially served the defendant with a private process server, then through ...
Eastern District of Texas Federal Court Practice - http://mcsmith.blogs.com/eastern_district_of_texas/
13 Feb 8:00 am
... the SA registry favour trade mark proprietor: Golden Fried Chicken (Pty) Ltd v Soulsa CC (Afro-IP) Spain Exhaustion of trade mark rights and ... steps Alternative Electrodes - Federal judge refuses to dismiss AE's claims that Encore Medical and Empi ran afoul of antitrust law by bringing meritless patent litigation and ... in CSIRO v Buffalo (EDTexweblog.com) Foley & Larder - DataTern and Amphion Innovations accuse Foley & Lardner of overcharging and underperforming (PatLit) General Electric - ...
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/blog
17 Oct 5:22 pm
... . The natural and proper timidity and delicacy which belongs to the female sex evidently unfits it for many of the occupations of civil life. The constitution of the family organization, which is founded in the divine ordinance, as well as in the nature ... Blog where author Chris Whitelaw (really??) quotes the Journal of Law and Medicine as follows: The adversarial system of medical negligence fails to satisfy the main aims of tort law, those being equitable compensation of plaintiffs, correction ...
Settle It Now Negotiation Blog - http://www.negotiationlawblog.com/
         
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck