Search for: "OnLineNic Inc"
Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
2 Jan 12:02 pm
... intent to profit from such registration or maintenance of the domain name." Here, Yahoo alleges that OnlineNIC registered the domain names
for itself (i.e., it was both the registrar and the registrant--see ... faith argument if Yahoo chooses to go that route. Verizon California, Inc. v. OnlineNIC Inc., 5:08-cv-02832-JF (N.D. Cal ... default judgment
order, Judge Fogel's brief opinion does conclude that OnlineNIC violated the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act: Defendant's actions
with respect ...
9 Sep 2:03 am
... trademarks infringed ($500,000) -- a total of $710,000. • Verizon California, Inc. v. OnlineNIC,
Inc., U.S.D.C., Northern District of California, Case ... site would receive, and consequently, the number of advertising dollars." The Court
characterized OnlineNIC's violations of the ACPA as "brazen" and concluded that it justified a per violation statutory ... deterring similar
conduct in the future. • Louis Vuitton Malletier v. Akanoc Solutions, Inc., U.S.D.C., Northern District of California, Case No. 5 ...
10 Sep 6:00 am
Verizon California Inc. v. OnlineNIC, Inc., 2009 WL 2706393
(N.D. Cal. 2009) Judge Fogel of the federal district court in San Jose issued ... "noncompliance with court orders, as well as its systematically deceptive behavior in evading service
of process." OnlineNIC made (what the Court deemed) a "cursory" argument that Verizon's award violated its substantive ... impossible proof of
damages or discovery of profits"); see also Lowry's Reports, Inc., 302 F.Supp.2d at 460 ("The Gore guideposts do not limit ...
2 Oct 1:47 am
... on punitive damage awards apply to statutory damages. Verizon v. OnlineNIC, Inc. The new case,
Verizon California Inc., v. OnlineNIC, No. C 08-2832 JF (RS), 2009 WL ... . Williams, 251 U.S. 63,
66-67 (1919)); see also Zomba Enterprises, Inc., 491 F.3d at 587 ("Regardless of the uncertainty regarding the application of Gore and Campbell
to statutory- ... such awards under [Williams] to ensure they comport with due process."); Arrez v. Kelly Services, Inc., 522 F. Supp. 2d 997,
1008 (N.D. Ill. 2007) ("In ...
8 Jan 8:17 am
... . District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, in its favor against Defendant, the registrar OnlineNIC,
Inc. (press release). Despite repeated attempts, Verizon was not able to serve notice on OnlineNIC;
the ... successfully collect, nonetheless, Verizon obtained a transfer order in its favor for all of the 663 infringing domain names. OnlineNIC
(including any related entity) was further enjoined from directly or indirectly (i) registering, trafficking in or using any ...
9 Jan 3:00 am
... puzzle (Part I - China Law Insight) (Part II - China Law Insight) Perfect 10, Inc v CCBill LLC - Insights on the applications of the safe
harbor principle and how this is applied in China (China Law ... Music - Warner Music musicians angered over YouTube dispute (Techdirt) US Trade Marks - Decisions OnlineNIC loses one cybersquatting lawsuit and gets sued in another: Verizon California, Inc v OnlineNIC Inc and Yahoo! Inc v OnlineNIC, Inc (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (The Trademark Blog) ( ...
18 Mar 8:07 am
Washington Post: Most Spam Sites Tied to Just 10 Registrars 1. XinNet Cyber Information Company Limited 2. eNom 3. Network Solutions 4. Register.com 5. Planet Online 6. Regtime Ltd. 7.
OnlineNIC Inc. 8. Spot Domain LLC 9. Wild West Domains 10. Hichina Web Solutions I suppose that one
way to give these numbers meaning would be to compare the number of 'spam sites' to the number of all domain names registered by that registrar.
9 Apr 6:36 pm
... Inc. (together "Godaddy") in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. See UBID, Inc. v. The GoDaddy Group, Inc. et al, Case No. 09-cv-02123 (N.D. Ill.). A copy of the complaint ... Godaddy
(definitely not your normal cybersquatter), this should be an interesting case. I would expect that Godaddy will at least answer the complaint (unlike OnlineNic did with Verizon's cybersquatting complaint). As a sidenote, does anybody else find it odd that Godaddy's Domain Name Registration ...
25 Feb 10:02 am
By Eric Goldman Philbrick v. eNom, Inc., 2009 WL 152127 (D.N.H. Jan. 22, 2009). The Justia page. Philbrick's Sports is a New Hampshire retailer
of sporting goods. eNom's customer registered two ... a registrar holding the domain name for itself, but calls eNom's argument "troubling" (for a little more on this, see my blog post
on OnlineNIC). Instead, the court finds that the Philbrick trademark is neither famous (thus not triggering the ACPA protection for famous
marks) nor distinctive because it's ...
13 Mar 3:00 am
... Law Blog) (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) US Trade Marks - Decisions District Court E D Virginia: Cybersquatter hit with maximum penalty: Citigroup, Inc v Shui (Internet Cases) AdJuggler obtains default judgment in trade mark case against Adjog.com (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) US Trade Marks - Lawsuits and
strategic steps Microsoft - Microsoft reaches settlement with OnlineNIC in cybersquatting dispute (Law360)
28 May 4:27 pm
By Eric Goldman Solid Host, NL v. NameCheap, Inc., 2:08-cv-05414-MMM-E (C.D. Cal. May 19, 2009) Facts This case involves an alleged domain name
theft. Solid Host is a web host and ... registrars in the past few months. In addition to this case, see the Vulcan Golf v. Google lawsuit (which named some registrars as defendants),
OnlineNIC cases, Philbrick v. eNom and uBid v. GoDaddy. Personally, I believe this litigation trend mirrors the expansion of new and legally
untested non-registration services ...
Search on: Blawgs.FM | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blog Search | Technorati | Google | MSN | Yahoo!