Search for: "Osram Sylvania, Inc."
Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
10 Oct, 2007 10:15 am
... between an affiant and an applicant, see Ferring B.V. v. Barr Labs., Inc., 437 F.3d 1181, 1187-88 (Fed. Cir. 2006); failure to disclose that ... arrange the priority of
issues in a manner that they consider efficient. Cf. R.R. Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co., 727 F.2d 1506, 1515 (Fed. Cir. 1984) ... obviously uninformed," retorts a commentator
identifying himself as John Mitchell, Chief IP Counsel for Osram Sylvania, Inc. "The professor should read the trial transcript
before making such statements. I ...
20 Jul 3:02 am
... Geo Foundation, Ltd. Plaintiffs entered into a license agreement with Technical Consumer Products, Inc. ("TCP") under which TCP would manufacture "off-brand" CFLs. That
license ... the same time, Nilssen was prosecuting another patent infringement suit against Osram Sylvania, Inc.
("Osram"). On July 6, 2006, after a six day bench trial, ... court sees no reason to revisit Judge Darrah's or the majority opinions in the
Osram litigation. Far too much judicial resources have been devoted to this losing ...
24 Oct, 2008 9:50 pm
... to the issue of privilege waiver in patent cases arise in In re Seagate Technology and inNilssen v. Osram Sylvania, Inc.
Seagate relied on outside counsel for opinions on patents and relied on the advice of counsel defense to rebut charges of ... fees on the patents at issue, and Nilssen waited until the
trial to make this claim. The District Court agreed with Osram, and the CAFC affirmed there was waiver and used it as a factor in determining
inequitable conduct and, ultimately, that the case was ...
18 Jul, 2008 12:38 pm
... any resulting patents unenforceable). It turns out that Nilssen's sloppiness before the PTO spilled over to the courtroom and has cost him about $6 million. Last month the Federal
Circuit affirmed a district court decision that Nilssen should pay Osram Sylvania, Inc.'s (Sylvania) attorney fees to
cover the cost of the patent infringement suit Nilssen brought against Sylvania. See the full post here.
22 Jan, 2008 2:24 am
... first part of this definition (reasonably important to an examiner) without giving necessary consideration to the latter part of the definition (in deciding whether to allow the
patent). See, e.g., Nilssen v. Osram Sylvania, Inc., 2007 WL 2937322 (Fed. Cir. 2007); McKesson Information Solutions,
Inc. v. Bridge ... Inc., 487 F.3d 897 (Fed. Cir. 2007); Ferring B.V. v. Barr Labs., Inc., 437 F.3d 1309 (Fed. Cir. 2006). As a result, when improperly applied, the
materiality standard ...
5 Jan 3:15 am
... Developments in EEO Law here 2nd Circuit Carras v. MGS 782 Lex, Inc., No. 07-4480 (2d Cir. Dec. 19, 2008)(Unpub) Reversing dismissal of ... . Reduction in Force Sufficient to
Overcome Pretext Argument in Retaliation Case Dennis v. Osram Sylvania, Inc. 2nd Cir. Comparators In Employment Discrimination
Case Must Be Similar Billue v. ... w/ Merry Christmas; files religion discrim charge vs Counts-Oakes Resorts Properties Inc; and here, here NEWS FGSU rewriting discrim/harass
policies following near-$5M ...
10 Oct, 2007 11:26 am
... fees, failing to disclose an affiant's financial interest in the patents, misclaiming priority dates, and not disclosing patent litigation and prior art. The court expressed
sympathy for the inventor but declined to excuse his too-many flubs. Nilssen v. Osram Sylvania, Inc., No. 06-1550 (Fed. Cir. Oct.
10, 2007). Get a lawyer, knucklehead! Barry Barnett Our feed hires only the best.
11 Oct, 2007 8:04 am
... , the court noted that this applicant prosecuted these patents pro se, and the court noted that while the inventor frequently has superior knowledge regarding the technical aspects
of the invention, prosecuting patents "requires both technical and legal credentials" to be effective. More detail of Nilssen v. Osram
Sylvania, Inc. after the jump. [More]
18 Jun, 2008 10:25 pm
... the Federal Circuit's previous opinion affirming the finding of inequitable conduct, she noted the court stated the actions that led to the finding "may have been an oversight."
With this low level of "bad" conduct, Judge Newman would have reversed the award of attorney fees. More concerning Nilssen v. Osram
Sylvania, Inc. after the jump. [More]
1 Jul, 2008 11:13 am
Nilssen v. Osram Sylvania, Inc., No. 2007-1998, -1348 Slip. Op. (Fed. Cir. June 17, 2008). The Federal Circuit affirmed Judge
Darrah's award of defendant's/appellee's attorney's fees - click here to read the Blog's post about the inequitable conduct opinion. Judge Darrah previously held and the Federal Circuit
previously affirmed that plaintiffs committed inequitable conduct by, among other things: (1) falsely claiming small entity status; (2) failing to disclose material prior ...
20 Jun, 2008 8:07 am
... collide in dispute over Allos domains: Pankajkumar Patel v Allos Therapeutics Inc: (IPKat), Dispute between estate of CS Lewis and Scottish couple over ... case attorney fees
based on multiplicity of minor acts of misconduct: Nilssen v Osram Sylvania: (Patently-O), (Patent Prospector), (IP Law360), (Hal
Wegner), Nilssen - ... not available for series of infringements where work was registered after first infringement: Derek Andrew, Inc v Poof Apparel Corp: (IP Law Observer),
Pressure Products Medical ...
Search on: Blawgs.FM | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blog Search | Technorati | Google | MSN | Yahoo!