Search for: "Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc"
Results 1 - 8 of 8
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe:  20 results  |  100 results
13 Aug, 2008 3:03 pm by Phil
... the Markman ruling on August 6, 2008 in Candela's patent lawsuit against Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: PMTI). In a Markman ruling, a district court hearing a patent infringement case ... litigation. On December 19, 2006, Candela filed a patent infringement complaint against Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: PMTI) in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division, asserting that Palomar's Lux 1540™, Lux DeepIR™, Lux IR™, Lux G™, and Lux Y™ ...
Tags: Markman
Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates - http://infringement.blogs.com/philip_brooks_patent_infr/
17 Feb, 2008 6:29 am
... a discovery matter relating to a patent lawsuit filed in the E.D. Texas. #8: Candela Corporation v. Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc., No. 8:2008cv00268, filed January 31, 2008; assigned to J. Williams This lawsuit ... devices, and it now seeks information from 16 physicians about how they operated the accused devices, and whether communications from Palomar to those physicians indicated how the accused devices should be operated for wrinkle treatment. That type of evidence is classic inducement ...
Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog - http://www.marylandiplaw.com/
7 Oct, 2008 11:44 pm by Phil
... Court for the Eastern District of Texas - Lufkin Division ruled in favor of Palomar in a patent infringement lawsuit brought by Candela against Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: PMTI) in December 2006. The jury ruled that Palomar did not infringe ... and are evaluating the Company's options." Candela notes that it continues to have two additional lawsuits against Palomar in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. Candela is the Plaintiff in one suit: C.A. No.: 1 ...
Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates - http://infringement.blogs.com/philip_brooks_patent_infr/
10 Sep, 2008 3:28 pm by Michael Smith
Candela v. Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc., 9:06cv277 (E.D. Tex. 2008) Judge: Ron Clark Holding: Rebuttal Report & Trial Exhibit & Witness List Motions DISMISSED I try and I try not to post on ... were due on September 5, 2008. In what may (or may not) be a proud moment for the defendant, Judge Clark noted that "[w]hile impressed by Palomar's ability to create a six-line, forty-nine word document title (Candela disappoints with only a three-line, twenty-three word title ...
Eastern District of Texas Federal Court Practice - http://mcsmith.blogs.com/eastern_district_of_texas/
10 Sep, 2008 10:29 pm by Michael Smith
Candela v. Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc., 9:06cv277 (E.D. Tex. 2008) Judge: Ron Clark Holding: Motions for Summary Judgment DENIED (mostly) Judge Clark's trial management order I posted on separately was accompanied by rulings on three pending summary judgment motions. I had them open anyway, so I thought I'd scribble down a quick summary for readers with nothing better to look at. In the first, a motion by the defendant seeking to find the patent invalid on enablement ...
Eastern District of Texas Federal Court Practice - http://mcsmith.blogs.com/eastern_district_of_texas/
30 Jun, 2008 3:38 pm
... O. Cox's dismissal based on a forum-selection clause in New Life Beauty Center, Inc.'s v. Palomar Medical Technologies, LLC. New Life sued Palomar for breach of a sales contract, apparently medical equipment. The one-page sales contract did not have a forum-selection clause, but ... -selection clause, but asserting a compulsory counterclaim does not. The Court of Appeals held that Palomar's counterclaim, being "inextricably bound to the same transaction from which the claim arose," was compulsory.
Arkansas Business Litigation Blog - http://www.arbusinesslitigation.com/
16 Aug, 2008 2:43 am
... Australian patent law needs reform: Occupational and Medical Innovations Ltd v Retractable Technologies Inc: (IP Thinktank), Full Federal Court finds two ... Candela - Texas court issues Markman ruling in Candela's suit against Palomar: (Philip Brooks), Chevron - Chevron to pay $48M to consumers in class action alleging ... IP Litigation Blog), Mattel - Bratz mandamus denied: (Property, intangible), Micron Technology - Powercip Semiconductor files amended intervenor complaint seeking to invalidate 11 DRAM ...
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/blog
13 Oct, 2008 12:12 pm
... (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Bad English in the patent procurement process: Predicate Logic, Inc. v. Distributive Software, LLC (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Erroneous revival by PTO ... damages following finding that Cie de Saint-Gobain infringed patent covering medical imaging technology (Law360) Jury finds no infringement and partial invalidity of Candela ... patent relating to laser and pulsed-light skin treatment in suit against Palomar (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) (Law360) Laches and equitable estoppel ...
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/blog
         
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck