Search for: "Pinkberry, Inc."
Results 1 - 7 of 7
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
15 Sep, 2008 8:15 am
... the Los Angeles Federal District Court, against several frozen yogurt competitors. Pinkberry's "frozen yogurt" treats are all the rage, which I don't quite ... its trademark
registrations may be comprised based on its representations to the USPTO. There are also allegations that Pinkberry indeed copied its store designs and frozen yogurt concept from
Korea based ... cases, filed in Los Angeles Federal District Court, are titled: Pinkberry, Inc. v. Pingo Foods Corporation, CV08-05926 R (C.D. Cal. 2008). ...
11 Sep, 2008 2:28 am
... Inc., No. 8:2008cv02355 (D. Md. filed Sep. 9, 2008); assigned to J. Titus California-based Pinkberry, Inc. is a wildly popular upscale frozen yogurt restaurant
with stores in New York and California. In its complaint ... "deliberately imitates Pinkberry's highly distinctive branding and trade dress." It contends that the use of the
YOGIBERRY mark infringes the registered PINKBERRY mark, service marks, and trade name, in a confusingly similar manner to sell goods that unfairly compete with Pinkberry'
...
2 Dec, 2008 3:16 am
... Western District Judge James Robart entered a Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction in Pinkberry, Inc. v. Yoberry, Inc. As STL readers may recall, the
burgeoning Los Angeles-based frozen yogurt seller Pinkberry sued the Seattle-based frozen yogurt seller Yoberry for trademark infringement, alleging a likelihood of ... store
appears to continue to display the swirl design mark to which Pinkberry objected. The case cite is Pinkberry, Inc. v. Yoberry, Inc., No. 08-1360 (W.D. Wash.
Dec. 1 ...
7 Oct, 2008 4:38 am
... , the Pinkberry, Inc., chain of frozen yogurt shops filed a trademark infringement suit in the Western District against the Seattle-based Yoberry, Inc., frozen
yogurt shop. The complaint alleges the parties' word marks are confusingly similar, as are the parties' design marks. Yoberry has not yet filed an answer. The case cite is
Pinkberry, Inc. v. Yoberry, Inc., No. 08-1360 (W.D. Wash.). Photo credits: Pinkberry.com and Yelp.com
8 Mar 3:00 am
... that the parties' respective marks are not confusingly similar or likely to cause confusion amongst consumers or the trade. Yogiberry, Inc., is the owner of Registration No.
3498624 for the mark shown below, which was registered on September 9, 2008, based on an application filed February 4, 2008: In view of the above opposition, Yogiberry, Inc., and
Pinkberry, Inc., filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland a stipulated motion to a stay their pending ...
5 Dec, 2008 3:00 pm
... to standard setting organisation and for litigation misconduct in failing to produce evidence: Qualcomm Inc v Broadcom Corp (IP Law Observer) (Patently-O) (Promote the
Progress) ... defences, denies summary judgment in 2(d) opposition: Land O'Lakes, Inc v Hugunin (TTABlog) Ron Coleman: 'Tackiness not grounds for refusal to register': ... trade
mark defence case via eBay (Techdirt) (The Trademark Blog) Pinkberry - Yoberry agrees to Pinkberry's permanent injunction (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) Tootsie Roll ...
12 Sep, 2008 2:33 pm
... confusingly similar to EDELMAN for handbags: In re SL&E Training Stable, Inc (precedential): (TTABlog), GANGA merely descriptive of department store services, says TTAB
... trade channels: In re Boyd Coddington's Hot Rods & Collectibles, Inc (non precedential): (TTABlog) US Trade Marks - Lawsuits and strategic steps ... HENDRIX marks
infringe marks belonging to Experience Hendrix: (Seattle Trademark Lawyer), Pinkberry - Pinkberry files trade mark infringement and trade dress misappropriation suit ...
Search on: Blawgs.FM | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blog Search | Technorati | Google | MSN | Yahoo!