Search for: "Protus IP Solutions Inc"
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe:  20 results  |  100 results
16 Jan 7:00 am
... question can reduce expense and improve business outcome of patent litigation (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Confessions of a 'recovering patent attorney' and why I have ... message for the Associate Solicitor (Hal Wegner) When it comes to patent marking, timing is everything (IP Frontline) 'The Likely Adverse Effects of an Apportionment-Centric System of Patent Damages' study ... denied citing In re VW II: J2 Global Communications, Inc v Protus IP Solutions, Inc (EDTexweblog.com) District Court S D New York ...
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/blog
24 Feb 12:51 pm by Michael C. Smith
j2 Global Communications Inc v. Protus IP Solutions Inc (6-08-cv-00211) (E.D. Tex. Feb. 20, 2009) Judge: John Love Well, it may not be as extensive as ... the transferee district has had extensive involvement with the patents and products at issue. Nor are these cases where all of the parties and witnesses are localized in one general geographic area. Compare Network-1 Sec. Solutions, Inc., 433 F. Supp. 2d at 800 (denying transfer where witnesses were located all over the world); with Odom, 2009 WL ...
Eastern District of Texas Federal Court Practice - http://mcsmith.blogs.com/eastern_district_of_texas/
14 Jan 9:18 am by Michael C. Smith
J2 Global Communications, Inc. v. Protus IP Solutions, Inc., 2008 WL 5378010(E.D.Tex. Dec 23, 2008) (NO. CIV.A. 6:08-CV-211, CIV.A. 6:08-CV-275, CIV.A. 6:08-CV-262, CIV.A. 6:08-CV- ... had concluded from proceeding. In an opinion that cites and applies for the first time the Fifth Circuit's recent en banc opinion in In re Volkswagen of America, Inc., 545 F.3d 304, 315.(5th Cir.2008), Judge John Love noted that "[t]he moving party must show that transfer is " ...
Eastern District of Texas Federal Court Practice - http://mcsmith.blogs.com/eastern_district_of_texas/
28 Dec, 2008 11:56 pm by The Docket Navigator
... Court has routinely rejected this sort of argument in patent cases. When a company sells allegedly infringing products, or offers allegedly infringing services, nationwide, 'no specific locality has a dominant interest in resolving the issue of [patent infringement].' " j2 Global Communications Inc v. Protus IP Solutions Inc., 6-08-cv-00211 (TXED December 23, 2008, Memorandum Opinion & Order)
Docket Report Patent Infringement Blog - http://docketreport.blogspot.com/
         
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck