Blawg Search - Law Blogs, Lawyer Blogs, Legal Blogs Directory & Search Engine

Paramount v. QVC is a lot like Paramount v. Time, and the decisions are entirely consistent: Paramount always loses. Beyond that, it is hard to say what principles are operative here. In this case, Paramount was trying to protect a...

On November 6, 2009, B&R Plastics, Inc. of Denver, Colorado ("B&R") filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. The complaint alleges that the following ... Northbrook, Illinois Home Depot Inc. of Atlanta, Georgia The Afternoon of Omaha, Nebraska The Container Store, Inc. of Coppell, Texas QVC, Inc. of West Chester, Pennsylvania According to the complaint, the "technology-at-issue relates to a unique and proprietary design for foldable stools. ...

... at the University of Pittsburgh in 2005. She has worked at various places prior to her work at Cozen. She has held positions at Baker & Taylor, Inc, Pennsylvania State University, Bucks County Community College and QVC, Inc. Tracy writes in her personal essay, "They say it takes a village to raise a child. Therefore, I am asking the SLA-Legal Division "village" assist me…I wish to have face time with experienced legal division members to ...

... context of a sale of a company from beginning to end.” Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc., 634 A.2d 345, 367 (Del. 1993). These obligations were not ... applied to all potential change of control transactions. Paramount Comm., Inc. v. QVC Network, Inc., 637 A.2d 34, 44 (Del. 1994). Ultimately, under ... application in other contexts. The underlying sense of a retreat from enhanced scrutiny under Revlon/QVC towards business judgment review in Lyondell echoes a similar approach in the recent Gantler ...

... crack or shatter when heated and poses a risk of burns and cuts to consumers. Meyer Trading Inc., the manufacturer of the cookware, and QVC informed the government that they had received reports of seventy-nine incidents involving the cookware. It ... go unreported by the consumer, so the actual number of injurious incidents involving the cookware may be much higher. QVC indicated that it has contacted known purchasers of the cookware to inform them of the recall. Clearly a cast iron pan that can ...

... analysis - and quick - from Travis Laster: Yesterday, the Delaware Supreme Court issued its much anticipated decision in CA, Inc. v. AFSCME Employees Pension Plan, No. 329, 2008 (Del. July 17, 2008), which resolved two questions of ... under a CA analysis. Outside the election process, the case is generally negative for stockholder-adopted bylaws. For example, the strong QVC/Quickturn analysis should doom any substantive component to a pill redemption bylaw, such as a requirement that directors not ...

... partner at Sullivan & Cromwell LLP. The panel discussed Delaware's significant deal protection decisions, including Smith v. Van Gorkom, Paramount Communications, Inc. v. Time Inc., Paramount Communications, Inc. v. QVC Network Inc., Quickturn Design Sys., Inc. v. Shapiro ... Re Corp. (in which the Vice Chancellor wrote the decision of the Chancery Court level) and Omnicare Inc. v. NCS Healthcare, Inc. There was then discussion of the advisory opinion in CA, Inc. v. ...

... , 2007), the assertion of FDA approval for multiple uses of a drug was in question. In Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. v. OSI Indus., Inc., 831 N.E.2d 192, 199 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005), statements that questioned who had ownership rights ... that D & W was a patent infringer - a pejorative allegation of shady business practices - was implicit in OroAmerica's statement to QVC that D & W's gold chains infringed its patents. See Atlantic Mut. Ins. Co. v. J. Lamb Inc., 100 Cal.App.4th 1017, 123 Cal.Rptr.2d ...

... the business judgment rule. Justice Moore was having none of that and made it clear that Revlon was to be considered a form of "enhanced scrutiny." These early decisions led to Paramount Communications, Inc. v. QVC Network, Inc., 637 A.2d 34 (1994). in which Chief Justice Veasey reasoned that enhanced ... implicates only the duty of care, the court will dismiss the claim. See In re Frederick's of Hollywood, Inc., 2000 WL 130630 (Del.Ch.). If the claim raises the possibility of bad faith or ...

... between rationality review and reasonableness review has been around for awhile. Vice-Chancellor Strine first articulated the difference in In re Toys 'R' Us, Inc. Shareholder Litigation (2005), and he took his cues in that case from Revlon itself and from QVC, both Delaware Supreme Court opinions. The interesting part of the contrast between rationality and reasonableness is not what it says about the Revlon standard, ...