Search for: "Retractable Technologies, Inc. v. Occupational & Medical Innovations, Ltd."
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
23 Sep, 2008 3:03 pm
Retractable Technologies, Inc. v. Occupational & Medical Innovations, Ltd., --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2008 WL 4287579(E.D.Tex. Sep 11, 2008) (NO. 6:08CV120) Judge: Leonard Davis Holding: Defendant's
Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(5) DENIED This was a dispute over the sufficiency of service on an Australian corporation in a patent case. Plaintiff
initially served the defendant with a private process server, then through the Texas Secretary of State. Judge ...
9 Aug, 2008 1:50 am
... to make and distribute copies of surveyors' drawings: (LawFont.com), Patent opposition and 'microemulsions': William A Newman v Solutions-IES: (IPRoo), Obviousness,
admissions on the face of the specification and the possible emergence of a five-step approach?: Insta Image Pty ... Pty Ltd: (IPRoo), Limited scope for patent non-infringement
declarations: Occupational and Medical Innovations Ltd v Retractable Technologies Inc: (Mallesons Stephen Jaques), Finkelstein J throws cold water on Registrar's ...
16 Aug, 2008 2:43 am
... why Australian patent law needs reform: Occupational and Medical Innovations Ltd
v Retractable Technologies Inc: (IP Thinktank), Full Federal Court finds ... Tencor's bid to invalidate method patent
asserted by Fujitsu against Nanya Technology, ruling no controversy exists between KLA and Fujitsu: (Law360), Gibson ... copying free software without complying with license is
copyright infringement: Robert Jacobsen v Matthew Katzer: (IP Thinktank), (Ars Technica), (Lessig), (creativecommons.org), (Electronic ...
11 Aug, 2008 3:14 pm
... you a non-infringement declaration in relation to someone else's patent? A: Australia, of course - have a look at the recent decision in Occupational and Medical Innovations Ltd v Retractable Technologies Inc [2008] FCA 1102. What an unfortunate turn of events this is. This is on top of the already unworkable requirement
that the person seeking the declaration of non-infringement must (a) pay the patentee's costs and (b) ...
Search on: Blawgs.FM | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blog Search | Technorati | Google | MSN | Yahoo!