Search for: "Riches v. McCain et al"
Results 1 - 6 of 6
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe:  20 results  |  100 results
22 Dec, 2006 11:31 am
... 'Humane' Doesn't Cut It (Nov. 10, 2005) 59. Marty Lederman, Hamdan, Rasul, et al., Imperiled (Nov. 11, 2005) 60. Marty Lederman, No Need to Fret About ... But Jack, Abuse is Not Mistreatment (Feb. 24, 2006) 81. David Luban, An Embarrassment of Riches (Mar. 4, 2006) 82. Marty Lederman, Does the Army Field Manual Authorize "Creative ... Posse Comitatus Act Still Exist? (July 15, 2005) 5. Marty Lederman, Cheney v. McCain for the Soul of the Republican Party? (July 23, 2005) 6. Marty Lederman, Judge Roberts ...
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com
23 Aug, 2008 1:23 am
... Office finds no risk of confusion for 'Zloty potok' figurative marks due to differences in 'rich layout and fancy designs': (Class 46) South Africa Mr Video granted ... States US General Reading between the lines of Supreme Court Justices' books: (Law360), McCain tech policy: crack down on internet piracy, fix patent mess: (Ars Technica ... declaration granted: EpicRealm Licensing LP and Parallel Networks LLC v Autoflex Leasing, Inc et al: (EDTexweblog.com), Fiji Water Co - 'Bottled at the source' is not ...
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/blog
4 Sep 2:48 pm by Lyle Denniston
... Corporations, he said, were the first victims of "this Orwellian announcement." In 2003, in the case of McConnell, et al., v. Federal Election Commission, et al., the Court upheld a provision of a 2002 campaign finance law that banned corporations - profit ... as Citizens United, but its backers have raised the rhetorical intensity considerably. The strongest words come from Sens. John McCain (Arizona Republican) and Russell Feingold (Wisconsin Democrat) and former House Reps. Christopher Shays, a ...
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/
28 Jun, 2007 9:46 am by Pat
... since the primary was - in Feingold's case - [AMF edit: not] a contested election? Roberts (like Scalia et al. and also the parties to the case) supposes that because Feingold is, among other things, a candidate therefore the statute ... Justice Roberts treat the case as a statutory matter rather than a constitutional matter as such? Maybe because the statute - the McCain Feingold Act - seemed to rest on a strong assumption that's easy to accept: Election campaigning is what's really important; ...
Discourse.net - http://www.discourse.net/
20 Jul, 2007 3:38 pm by Jan Crawford
... allow other regulations and restrictions down the line. Sure, it didn't overturn McCain-Feingold, but it limited its scope with a decision that is certain to lead to more attacks down the ... in his day-as he repeatedly slammed the new Roberts Court for caring only about rich people, white people and corporations. It's like legitimate debate about law ... yesterday's dismissal of Valerie Plame's lawsuit against Cheney, Rove, et al). But it also is one that was decided by a 7-2 vote, with Justice Souter ...
Legalities - http://blogs.abcnews.com/legalities/
20 Jul, 2007 3:38 pm by Jan Crawford
... allow other regulations and restrictions down the line. Sure, it didn't overturn McCain-Feingold, but it limited its scope with a decision that is certain to lead to more attacks down the ... in his day-as he repeatedly slammed the new Roberts Court for caring only about rich people, white people and corporations. It's like legitimate debate about law ... yesterday's dismissal of Valerie Plame's lawsuit against Cheney, Rove, et al). But it also is one that was decided by a 7-2 vote, with Justice Souter ...
Legalities - http://blogs.abcnews.com/legalities/
         
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck