Search for: "Shure, Inc"
Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
10 Mar 12:34 pm
Hearing Components, Inc v. Shure, Inc (9-07-cv-00104) (E.D. Tex. March 6, 2009) Judge Clark.
The jury in this case returned a verdict for ... damages of $4.622 million on January 21 in Judge Clark's court. Defendant Shure filed a motion for judgment as a matter of law
(JMOL) of noninfringement, and Judge Clark granted it, ... patents-in-suit. Accordingly, he struck the portion of the jury verdict awarding damages for infringement by Shure's
straight nozzle products, which totalled $3,230,635.00. The ...
20 Jun, 2008 3:57 pm
Hearing Components v. Shure (E.D.Tex. 2008) Prior to the Markman hearing, the parties jointly requested a page length exception for their briefs. The problem, they argued, was
that the three hearing aid patents in suit included a large number of ... resolved. Perhaps the solution is to require some threshold explanation as to why each additional term needs to
be construed. Read O2 Micro Read Judge Clark's Order See E.D.Tex Blog Hearing Components, Inc v. Shure, Inc (9-07-cv-00104) TXED Tags: EDTX
13 Mar 4:00 am
... 's knowledge of re-examination certificate may constitute 'objective recklessness': Ultratech International Inc v Swimways Corp (Peter
Zura's 271 Patent Blog) District Court E D Texas: Patent verdict cut by ⅔ post verdict: Hearing Components, Inc v Shure, Inc (EDTexweblog.com) Portland jury finds validity and infringement, awarding ... (Law360) Fellowes - Stay pending reexam granted as to one of three patents:
Fellowes, Inc v Aurora Corp of America (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Flexsys ...
9 Apr 9:27 am
... in licensing agreements did not constitute patent misuse: Hearing Components, Inc v Shure, Inc (EDTexweblog.com) District Court N D Illinois: Missing joint claim ... ; Lyle (Law360) CAFC: experiment use explained: Clock Spring LP v Wrapmaster,
Inc (I/P Updates Updates) Analysis and commentary on Tafas v Doll ruling (IP ... a faithless servant indeed: Asociación de Industriales de
Puerto Rico v. MarketNext, Inc (Property, intangible) District Court N D Illinois: No disqualification for counsel's prior ...
10 Mar 12:38 am
... what did not work well, the party would have, mathematically, some 502 potential combinations of two or more references from which to choose. Some of them may actually invalidate a
claim, but is it clear and convincing evidence to the jury if that combination was not explained to them?" Hearing Components, Inc. v.
Shure, Inc., 9-07-cv-00104 (TXED March 6, 2009, Order)
30 Mar 12:18 am
... patent expired . . . )." "Because [defendant] has not established that any of the complained-of limitations in [plaintiff's] licensing agreements constitute patent misuse, either
per se or under a 'rule of reason' analysis, the court will deny [defendant's] claims." Hearing Components, Inc. v. Shure,
Inc., 9-07-cv-00104 (TXED March 26, 2009, Memorandum & Order)
3 Apr 7:00 am
Hearing Components, Inc. v. Shure, Inc., 2009 WL 815526(E.D.Tex. Mar 26, 2009) (NO.
9:07-CV-104) Judge: Ron Clark Judge Clark recently conducted a bench trial on the defendant's claims of laches and patent misuse in this case. While he denied the laches claim at the
hearing, he issued this order later denying the patent miuse claim and setting forth his reason for concluding that the limitations in the plaintiff's licensing agreements did not
constitute patent ...
21 May 12:46 am
... . "[Defendant] need not individually identify each copy made, but it provided absolutely no explanation to the court of why these copies were necessary. The court cannot even
identify the purpose of some of these charges, much less determine necessity, from the papers submitted." Hearing Components, Inc v.
Shure, Inc., 9-07-00104 (TXED May 19, 2009, Order) District Judge Ron Clark
3 Apr 7:23 pm
... in patent pool: Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. v. Cinram International Inc (Property, intangible) USPTO rules for Smith & Nephew
in suture patent fight with ... Reynolds fails to stay tobacco-curing patent trial in dispute with Star Scientific (Law360) Shure - Shure's patent misuse claims nixed in
earphone case brought by Hearing ... N D Illinois: No dismissal on pleadings for factual trademark defences: DeVry Inc v University of Medicine
& Health Sciences - St Kitts (Chicago Intellectual ...
23 Jan 1:00 am
... appeal against rejection of OPTIMUM on grounds of lack of distinctive character: Hi-Bred International, Inc. v OHIM (Class 46) CFI
dismisses Commercy's appeal against refusal ... Jury awards hearing device manufacturer over $4.6 million after finding Shure infringed patent covering earphone technology that
blocks out background noise (Law360) ... patents owned by Broadcom (Law360) Federal Circuit weighs in on 'patent ambushes': Qualcomm Inc v
Broadcom Corp (IP Frontline) Get it through your head, you ...
20 Jun, 2008 3:08 pm
Hearing Components, Inc v. Shure, Inc (9-07-cv-00104) TXED Judge: Ron Clark Holding:
Stipulated/Agreed Motion for Leave to Exceed the Page Limits for Claim Construction Briefs DENIED The late great Sam Kinison had a routine in which he said that the answer to
homelessness was to line up the homeless people and shoot the first one who said he had tried to get a job and just couldn't, on the theory was that the next homeless person in line
would be far more ...
Search on: Blawgs.FM | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blog Search | Technorati | Google | MSN | Yahoo!