Search for: "Smith & Nephew, Inc., ."
Results 1 - 20 of 54
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe:  20 results  |  100 results
11 Aug 8:51 am by Heather Young
... & Nephew Inc's Advanced Wound Management division (LSE: SN; NYSE: SNN) announced that the German District Court in Dusseldorf decided in favour of Smith & ... said Robin Carlstein, Senior Vice President of Advanced Wound Devices at Smith & Nephew. "Clearly, we are pleased with the German District Court's findings in this matter ... Trauma and Clinical Therapies, Endoscopy and Advanced Wound Management. Smith & Nephew is a global leader in arthroscopy and advanced wound management and is one ...
Legal Radar - http://www.legalradar.com/
17 Mar 3:12 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
EarthTimes reports: Smith & Nephew Inc.'s Advanced Wound Management division announced that the German Federal Patent Court in Munich has held the Wake Forest patent for negative pressure (NPWT) licensed to Kinetic Concepts, Inc. invalid in Germany. BUT from yahoofinance: Kinetic Concepts, Inc. announced ... 0620720 (DE 69224847)) is being challenged by Medela, Mölnlycke Health Care AB, and Smith & Nephew plc. The decision is not final and KCI and Wake Forest intend to ...
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com
28 May, 2008 5:09 pm by Breakstone, White & Gluck
... defective product because of the unacceptably high rate of post-surgery complications. The defective product has been approved for use in the United States since 2006, has been recalled by the United States distributor, Smith & Nephew, Inc., Endoscopy Division of Andover, MA. The US recall was issued urgently on August 21, 2007. The screw was also ordered recalled in the United Kingdom. If you had surgery which involved the CALAXO surgical screw, you ...
Massachusetts Injury Lawyer Blog - http://www.massachusettsinjurylawyerblog.com/
9 Nov, 2008 8:57 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
In June 2008 a federal court in D. Oregon determined that Arthrex willfully infringed on Smith & Nephew's patent by marketing and selling certain types of suture anchors used in various surgeries, including shoulder surgery. The jury awarded Smith & Nephew $14.7 million for past infringement through 2005. Now, Arthrex is enjoined from manufacturing and selling the infringing Bio-SutureTak and PEEK SutureTak anchors, and the district court will ...
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com
24 Jul 11:22 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
... in the US re-examination fight but suggests outcomes have been different in other jurisdictions (countries): Smith & Nephew Inc.'s Advanced Wound Management division announced that the United States Patent and Trademark Office (Patent ... in re-examination proceedings involving three of the negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) patents licensed to Kinetic Concepts, Inc. , confirming the patentability of the re-examined claims. The re-examination proceedings are still pending, and Smith & ...
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com
24 Sep 5:09 am by Beck/Herrmann
... F.2d 341, 344 (8th Cir. 1988) (applying Missouri law); Stanger v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., 410 F. Supp. 2d 974, 982 (E.D. Mo. 2005); ... would "not parallel federal safety requirements" and was preempted) (applying Ohio law); In re Medtronic, Inc. Sprint Fidelis Leads Products Liability Litigation, 592 F. Supp.2d 1147, 1159 ( ... Supp. 1579, 1581-82 (D. Minn. 1988) (manufacturer instituted recall); Richardson-Merrell, Inc. "Bendectin" Products Liability Litigation, 624 F. Supp. 1212, 1239 (S.D. Ohio ...
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com
28 Sep 1:31 am
... F.2d 341, 344 (8th Cir. 1988) (applying Missouri law); Stanger v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., 410 F. Supp. 2d 974, 982 (E.D. Mo. 2005); ... would "not parallel federal safety requirements" and was preempted) (applying Ohio law); In re Medtronic, Inc. Sprint Fidelis Leads Products Liability Litigation, 592 F. Supp.2d 1147, 1159 ( ... Supp. 1579, 1581-82 (D. Minn. 1988) (manufacturer instituted recall); Richardson-Merrell, Inc. "Bendectin" Products Liability Litigation, 624 F. Supp. 1212, 1239 (S.D. Ohio ...
DRI - http://forthedefense.org/
28 Sep 1:31 am
... F.2d 341, 344 (8th Cir. 1988) (applying Missouri law); Stanger v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., 410 F. Supp. 2d 974, 982 (E.D. Mo. 2005); ... would "not parallel federal safety requirements" and was preempted) (applying Ohio law); In re Medtronic, Inc. Sprint Fidelis Leads Products Liability Litigation, 592 F. Supp.2d 1147, 1159 ( ... Supp. 1579, 1581-82 (D. Minn. 1988) (manufacturer instituted recall); Richardson-Merrell, Inc. "Bendectin" Products Liability Litigation, 624 F. Supp. 1212, 1239 (S.D. Ohio ...
DRI - http://forthedefense.org/
28 Sep 1:31 am
... F.2d 341, 344 (8th Cir. 1988) (applying Missouri law); Stanger v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., 410 F. Supp. 2d 974, 982 (E.D. Mo. 2005); ... would "not parallel federal safety requirements" and was preempted) (applying Ohio law); In re Medtronic, Inc. Sprint Fidelis Leads Products Liability Litigation, 592 F. Supp.2d 1147, 1159 ( ... Supp. 1579, 1581-82 (D. Minn. 1988) (manufacturer instituted recall); Richardson-Merrell, Inc. "Bendectin" Products Liability Litigation, 624 F. Supp. 1212, 1239 (S.D. Ohio ...
DRI - http://forthedefense.org/
11 May, 2007 6:29 am by Michael J. Hassen
... WL 1191001, *1 (Jud.Pan.Mult.Lit. April 18, 2007). Defense attorneys for several of the defendants - specifically, Zimmer Holdings, Zimmer, Inc., Stryker Corp., Biomet, DePuy Orthopaedics and/or DePuy, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, and Smith & Nephew plc and Smith & Nephew, Inc., id., at *1 n.2 - filed a motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) requesting centralization of the class actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 in the ...
Class Action Defense Blog - http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/
6 Jul, 2007 4:29 am
... to encourage, much less require, a drug manufacturer to intervene in it." Swayze v. McNeil Laboratories, Inc., 807 F.2d 464, 471 (5th Cir. 1987) (applying Mississippi law). ... to limited situations or patient populations) that the FDA requires product labeling to include. [S]ince the typical manufacturer's warning provides a list with scores of potential side effects, no ... 11 (11th Cir. June 1, 2007) (applying Alabama law); Stilwell v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., 482 F.3d 1187, 1194 (9th Cir. 2007) ( ...
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com
20 Mar 2:05 am by Beck/Herrmann
... Rptr. 299, 305-06 (Cal. App. 1986); Fogo v. Cutter Laboratories, Inc., 137 Cal. Rptr. 417, 422-23 (Cal. App. 1977); Carmichael v. ... Ann. §9:2800.59(B); Cauvin v. Sisters of Mercy Health System, Inc., 818 So.2d 833, 835 (La. App. 2002); Kinney v. Hutchinson, 468 ... 789 (5th Cir. 1988). Maine: Porter v. Pfizer Hospital Products Group, Inc., 783 F.Supp. 1466, 1475 (D. Me. 1992). Maryland: Gourdine v. ... 370 F.2d 82, 84 (8th Cir. 1966); Stanger v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., 401 F.Supp.2d 974, 980-81 (E.D. ...
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com
7 May 6:08 am by Beck/Herrmann
... between "differential diagnosis" and "differential etiology" further, see McClain v. Metabolife International, Inc., 401 F.3d 1233, 1252 (11th Cir. 2005), otherwise, follow us. In ... cause was not reached would therefore result in a finding of unreliability"); Bart v. Certainteed Products, Inc., 2005 WL 182711, at *3 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 27, 2005) (excluding ... these potential causes until reaching one that cannot be ruled out"); Cooper v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., 259 F.3d 194, 202 (4th Cir. 2001) ("if ...
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com
28 Sep, 2007 7:07 am
... kickback relationships with orthopedic surgeons. Under the settlement, Zimmer, Inc., Depuy Othopaedics, Inc., Biomet, Inc., and Smith & Nephew, Inc. entered deferred prosecution agreements under which they agreed to pay a total of $310 million, submit to 18 months of federal monitoring and implement additional reforms over the next five years. A fifth company, Stryker Orthopedics, Inc., agreed to submit to monitoring, but refused to enter into any monetary settlement, leaving it ...
InsureReinsure.Com: The Insurance & Reinsurance Blog - http://www.insurereinsure.com/
7 Sep, 2008 2:47 pm
... 2007 settlement was that hip and knee device manufacturers Zimmer, Inc., DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. Biomet, Inc, and Smith & Nephew, inc. each entered into agreements with the Government in settlement of False Claims Act ... dollars. However, cefore the aforementioned OIG investigations took place, the largest kickback settlement involving PharMerica, Inc. had totaled only $6 million. Prompted by substantial information indicating widesprread manufacturer-physician influence, Senators Grassley ...
West Palm Beach Personal Injury Lawyer - http://westpalmbeach.injuryboard.com/
8 Jun, 2007 7:22 am
/**/ McNeil-PPC, inc. v. Perrigo, Co., 05 Civ. 1321 (SDNY, June 5, 2007) Since KSR, there have only been 3 published district court decisions that addressed the new standard of obviousness: Technology Licensing Corp. v. Gennum Corp., No. 01-04204, 2007 WL 1319528, at *18 n.38 (N.D. Cal. May 4, 2007) Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. Arthrex, Inc., No. 04-29, 2007 WL 1467228 (D. Or. May 17, 2007) Abbott Labs. v. Sandoz, Inc., No. 05-5373, 2007 WL 1549498 (N.D. Ill. May 24, 2007) This week, the SDNY ...
Tags: McNeil
Two-Seventy-One Patent Blog - http://271patent.blogspot.com
30 Sep, 2007 10:23 pm
... offered a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) for their voluntary cooperation in the investigation. The companies named in the settlement were Zimmer, Inc.; Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc.; Smith & Nephew Inc.; and Biomet Orthopedics, Inc. Click here to read the Department of Justice press release Five Companies in Hip and Knee Replacement Industry Avoid Prosecution by Agreeing to Compliance Rules and Monitoring.
Quitam Help - http://www.quitamhelp.com/
23 Aug, 2008 11:22 am by Richard E. Vollertsen
... or a medical device, check with the Association for Medical Ethics to see if your doctor has improper financial ties with the manufacturer. As a result of a U.S. Department of Justice settlement with four medical device companies, Zimmer, Inc., DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Biomet, Inc., and Smith & Nephew, Inc., these back door consulting agreements must now be made public. (See our earlier post about this: Financial ...
Alaska Injury Law Blog - http://www.alaskainjurylawblog.com/
7 Sep, 2007 1:11 am
... Doctors of All Known Potential Side Effects Mulhall, plaintiffs-respondents v. Smith & Nephew Inc., defendant-appellant NEW YORK COUNTY Alternative Dispute Resolution Insured Cannot ... Repudiate Policy's Arbitration Provision Sozzi v. Moishe's Moving Systems Inc. BRONX COUNTY Trusts and Estates Guardian Fails to Show Purchase of Million Dollar ... Did Not Support Inference of Discrimination Thomas v. S.E.A.L. Security Inc. U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Criminal Practice Counts ...
New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library Blog - http://www.bloglines.com/blog/PLL
22 Aug, 2007 10:44 am
... intersection of Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule 702 and the ruling in Daubert v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) ("Daubert") concerning the admissibility of expert testimony and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 56 for summary judgment. Stillwell v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., 482 F.3d 1187 (9th Cir. 2007). Admissibility of expert testimony must be carefully evaluated for reliability and helpfulness, but that is different than the analysis for ...
IP Law Blog - http://www.theiplawblog.com/
        Next >
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck