Search for: "T Mobile USA, Inc."
Results 1 - 20 of 98
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
27 May, 2008 3:43 pm
Today, the U.S. Supreme Court denied a petition for a writ of certiorari in T-Mobile USA,
Inc. v. Laster, 07-976 (order list dated 05/27/08). The petition sought review of ... embedded in arbitration clauses. Earlier in the year, the Supreme Court also declined to
take up that same issue in Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Gentry, decided by the California Supreme Court. Links to the briefing in the T-Mobile case are available via SCOTUSBlog. [Via The Complex Litigator; Consumer Law & Policy Blog]
27 May 6:00 am
... down a number of interesting opinions relating to class actions in recent months: In Chalk v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., 560 F.3d 1087 (Mar. 27, 2009), the court struck down an ... a class action ban as unconscionable under Oregon law. In Hunt v.
Imperial Merchant Servs., Inc., 560 F.3d 1137 (Mar. 31, 2009), the court held, apparently for the first ... waiting for the Ninth Circuit to hand down its en banc opinion in
Dukes v. Wal-Mart, Inc., nos. 04-16688 & 04-16720, which was argued on March 24, 2009.
4 Jun, 2008 2:00 pm
... 353, 2008 U.S. LEXIS 2405, 76 U.S.L.W. 3497, 183 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2992. On May 27, the Supreme Court also denied certiorari in T-Mobile USA, Inc. v. Laster (9th Cir. 2007) 252 Fed.Appx. 777 (2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 25265, 2007 WL
3194117), (S.Ct. No. 07-976, 2008 ... had previously denied a similar petition for writ of certiorari taken from the California Supreme Court's decision in Circuit City Stores,
Inc. v. Gentry (2007) 42 Cal.4th 443, decided by the California Supreme Court.
23 Jan, 2008 12:15 am
... such a clause unenforceable under Washington state law. See Lowden v. T-Mobile USA,
Inc., No. 06-35395 __ F.3d __ , 2008 WL 170279 ... waiver was unconscionable. In another recent case, Shroyer v. New Cingular Wireless Servs., Inc., 498 F.3d 976 (2007),
the Ninth Circuit held that a mandatory arbitration clause with ... While I agree that creditors prefer arbitration clauses in order to avoid class actions, I don't agree with his analysis of the relative overall costs. He suggests that, even factoring in ...
7 Jul 5:12 am
... of 25,000 workers alleging labor law violations; specifically, the class action complaint "alleged that T-Mobile willfully failed to pay its hourly employees for all the hours they worked, forcing employees to work ... the clock' and denying pay for hours worked
during breaks." Smith v. T-Mobile USA Inc., ___ F.3d ___ (9th Cir. June 15, 2009) [ ...
913, 915-19 (5th Cir. 2008); Cameron-Grant v. Maxim Healthcare Servs., Inc., 347 F.3d 1240, 1247-49 (11th Cir. 2003)). The Circuit Court therefore dismissed ...
23 Jul, 2008 12:21 pm
... unfair business practices in connection with cellular telephone text messaging; specifically, the class action alleged that "T-Mobile charges customers for the receipt of unsolicited text messages, and does not adequately disclose the
practice in its contract with customers." Zaldivar v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., ___ F.Supp.2d
___ (W.D. Wash. July 15, ... the class action. The federal court distinguished Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USA, 317 F.3d 1097 (9th Cir. 2003), which held that a plaintiff who "' ...
18 Jun 5:12 am
... class action complaint alleged labor law violations. Vega v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.,
___ F.3d ___, 1260-61 (11th Cir ... employees' services without fully compensating them for such services." Id., at 1262. T-Mobile's compensation package for retail sales representatives consisted of an hourly wage ... indicated nothing about any failure to pay commissions in the
first instance, the inclusion in the class of T-Mobile 'employees ... who ... were entitled to
receive[ ] commissions ... who did not receive their ...
28 Feb, 2008 4:07 am
... for roaming and other services that should have been free." Lowden v. T-Mobile USA,
Inc., 512 F. 3d 1213, 1215 (9th Cir. 2008). The service ... arbitration clause under "a principle that applies to contract generally." Id. (citing Doctor's Assocs., Inc.
v. Casarotto, 517 U.S. 681 (1996)). The Ninth Circuit rejected defense arguments ... under the FAA," relying on its prior opinion in Shroyer v. New Cingular Wireless Servs.,
Inc., 498 F.3d 976 (9th Cir. 2007), discussing a similar class action waiver ...
5 May, 2008 1:01 am
... unlock the phones and disable the installed software and then the phones are shipped overseas and sold as new T-Mobile phones which are operable on other cellular telephone networks. Also, T-Mobile alleges ... and limit the sale and use of the phones. By unlocking the phones and not activating them on the T-Mobile network, the defendants are allegedly breaching the contractual terms of purchase. The case is titled
T-Mobile USA, Inc. v. All Pro Distributing, Inc., et al., CV08-02691 GW (C.D.
Cal. ...
6 Sep, 2007 6:21 am
... customers cannot use if they switch to another carrier. Gatton v. T-Mobile USA,
Inc., 152 Cal.App.4th 571, 61 Cal.Rptr.3d ... be unlocked simply by entering a numerical code, id. The class action complaint alleges that T-Mobile falsely represents that its phones "are not compatible with and will not work with other wireless ...
waiver provision was not procedurally unconscionable "because plaintiffs had the option of obtaining mobile phone service from one of two other
providers whose agreements did not ...
4 Jul, 2007 1:00 pm
Happy Independence Day. This is off topic, especially since its tenuous connection to wage and hour law will disappear after Gentry v. Superior Court, but we aren't doing any work today, and posting about wage and hour developments is work. Anyhow, it looks like you don't have
to worry about the arbitration clause on your cell phone agreement anymore if T-Mobile is your
carrier. Kudos to Bruce Gatton and Christina Nguyen, the lead plaintiffs in Gatton v. T-Mobile
USA, Inc.
11 Sep, 2007 8:36 pm
NTP, a Virginia-based patent holding company, has filed lawsuits in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia [EDVa] against Verizon Wireless, AT&T Inc., Sprint Nextel Corp. and Deutsche Telekom AG's T-Mobile
USA. The NTP complaint seeks unspecified damages and an injunction requiring the defendants to stop the alleged patent infringement. NTP previously prevailed against RIM,
obtaining a 612.5 million settlement. See also ZDNet--> NTP: We sue the (wireless) world.
10 Jan, 2008 6:00 am
... the justifiable reliance element of a fraud cause of action (Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc. (1997) 15 Cal.4th 951, 974). In a fraud case, justifiable reliance is
the ... probability, have entered into the contract or other transaction."'" (Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc., supra, 15 Cal. 4th at p. 976; see Mirkin v. Wasserman
(1993) ... the terms "causation" and "reliance" together or interchangeably. (E.g., Laster v. T Mobile USA, Inc., supra, 407 F.Supp.2d at p. 1194.) Slip op. at ...
19 Apr, 2007 8:23 am
... -term lease masquerading as a loan. If mobile home owners are really renters, You're really a renter in disguise, aren't you? None of the appreciation, all ... particular borrower might default, and as we have seen in previous posts, mobile homes generally do not retain their residual value, in part because ... without a compaction of capital, the incentives are entirely misaligned. That
in fact happened here: Conseco Inc., an insurance, investment and lending company based in Carmel, filed for Chapter 11 ...
18 Jul 6:12 am
... -Mobile smart phones and were required to review and respond to numerous T-Mobile-related e-mails and text messages both day and night, ... Becker Green Wickliff & Hall. "Putting aside the merits of the case against
T-Mobile, this case illustrates the legal implications of introducing technology into the workplace,
especially ... a nationwide, opt-in collective action consisting of all persons who are or were employed by T-Mobile USA Inc. from July 10, 2006, to date as retail sales associates and ...
7 May, 2008 7:11 am
... Conference of May 22, 2008 __________________ Docket: 07-976 Case name: T-Mobile USA,
Inc., et al. v. Laster, et al. Issue: Whether, under ... reply Amicus brief of CTIA -The Wireless Association (in support of the petitioner) Amicus brief of
AT&T Mobility LLC (in support of neither party) __________________ Docket: 07-977 Case name: ... 's reply __________________ Docket:
07-1111 Case name: The Lighthouse Institute for Evangelism, Inc., et al. v. City of Long Branch, New Jersey Issue: Whether, under ...
14 Apr, 2008 7:55 am
PowerOasis Inc. v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., (2007-1265), April 11, 2008 (link) A CIP
patent asserted by PowerOasis was challenged in the district court over prior art that became available before the ... Regarding expert testimony that declared that the disputed
features were "well known to those of ordinary skill," the CAFC rebutted that "[a]t best, this is a statement that it would be obvious to
substitute a customer laptop for the user interface disclosed on the vending machine. Obviousness simply is ...
31 Mar 11:40 am
In Chalk v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., No. 06-35909 (9th Cir. Mar. 27, 2009), the issue before
the Ninth Circuit is whether a class action waiver in an agreement between T-Mobile and its customers
is ... PC card manufactured by Sony. The card enables computers to connect wirelessly to the Internet. By signing the one-year service agreement with T-Mobile, the plaintiffs acknowledged that the agreement: REQUIRES MANDATORY ARBITRATION OF DISPUTES; REQUIRES
MANDATORY WAIVER OF THE RIGHT TO JURY ...
10 Jul, 2007 8:15 am
CCH Workweek provides the following summary of the recent 10th Circuit case of Berry v T-Mobile
USA, Inc, No. 05-1533 (10thCir. June 27, 2007):T-Mobile USA, Inc's
approval of FMLA leave for an employee with multiple sclerosis was insufficient to prove...
9 Nov, 2007 6:00 am
... (C.D.Cal. 2005) 426 F.Supp.2d 1061, 1069; Laster v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. (S.D.Cal.
2005) 407 F.Supp.2d 1181, 1194), ( ... defendant's store in response to the defendant's "bait and switch" advertisement -- but then didn't buy
anything -- constituted "injury in fact" and "loss of money or property." Id. at 16-17. ... law disregards trifles" must be applied to limit the "any damage" requirement of the CLRA.
(Harris v. Time, Inc. (1987) 191 Cal.App.3d 449, 458 [holding that a suit for damages based on being ...
Search on: Blawgs.FM | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blog Search | Technorati | Google | MSN | Yahoo!











