Search for: "TubeMaster, Inc."
Results 1 - 6 of 6
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
28 May, 2008 6:35 am
In Cat Tech. LLC. v. Tubemaster Inc. May 28, 2008), the U.S. Court of appeals for the Federal Circuit examined the second prong of the thw-prong test for determining the
existence ... no further steps toward manufacturing its loading devices until it receives an order from a customer with the appropriate dimensions. TubeMaster has already
successfully manufactured and delivered a loading device using configuration 3. See Interdynamics, Inc. v. Wolf, 698 F.2d 157, 169-74 (3d Cir. 1982) (Declaratory ...
29 May, 2008 6:01 am
Cat Tech LLC v. TubeMaster, Inc. (2007-1443), May 28, 2008 TubeMaster developed a method of putting catalyst into reactor tubes using loading devices. Tube Master
designed four different configurations for its ... 's reactor, it can take no further steps toward manufacturing its loading devices until it receives an order from a customer with the
appropriate dimensions. TubeMaster has already successfully manufactured and delivered a loading device using configuration 3 . . . It is prepared to produce ...
29 May, 2008 1:22 pm
Cat Tech LLC v. TubeMaster, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2008) Cat sued TubeMaster - alleging infringement of its patent covering a method of using a catalyst loading devices to
simultaneously load thousands of tube reactors. ... make substantial modifications to its loading device designs once production begins." Finally, although also a factor in the
analysis, the fact that TubeMaster had not created any sales literature or begun advertising its alternate configurations did not negate the immediacy and reality ...
28 May, 2008 7:05 pm
Case: Cat Tech. LLC. v. Tubemaster Inc., Fed. Cir. No. 07-1443 (5/28/08) The One Sentence Summary: The second prong of the Federal Circuit's declaratory judgment test
survives after the Supreme Court's Medimmune decision, and was met here where the accused infringer had made preparations to infringe. What They Were Fighting About: The Federal Circuit
panel affirmed summary judgment of non-infringement for reactors that did not meet spacing requirements set out ...
29 May, 2008 3:09 pm
... the court affirmed the district court's claim construction and the related finding of noninfringement. The court rejected the plaintiff's proposed construction because it would
render the limitation functionally meaningless, and described the plaintiff's position as "semantic antics." More detail on CAT Tech. LLC v. TubeMaster, Inc. after the
jump. [More]
30 May, 2008 9:09 am
... , concrete steps to conduct infringing activity' to satisfy MedImmune test: Cat Technologies v Tubemaster: (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (IP Updates), (Hal Wegner), (ISinIP
... and Commercial Court hands down ruling in trade mark case H-D Michigan Inc v MC Parts: (International Law Office), (Class 46) Europe Is Microsoft's open ... , concrete steps
to conduct infringing activity' to satisfy MedImmune test: Cat Technologies v Tubemaster: (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (IP Updates), (Hal Wegner), (ISinIP ...
Search on: Blawgs.FM | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blog Search | Technorati | Google | MSN | Yahoo!