Search for: "Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation"
Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe:  20 results  |  100 results
7 Oct, 2007 10:18 pm by Keith Henning
Filed last week in the Federal District court, New York Southern District Court was Bourne Co. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, et al, Case Number: 1:2007cv08580, Filed: October 3, 2007. The owner of the copyright of the song "When You Wish Upon a Star" is suing 20th Century Fox (and others including Seth McFarlane personally) [...]
Copywrite - http://copywrite.wordpress.com
22 Aug 5:57 pm by Milord A. Keshishian
Los Angeles, CA - Plaintiffs Twentieth Television, Inc. and Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation sued Roberts Brother Properties, LLC and several related ... Indiana; Jackson, Mississippi; Saint Louis, Missouri; and Columbia, South Carolina. Twentieth is the licensing agent for the free broadcast television rights in the following programs: King of the Hill ... Judge Alex, Divorce Court, Cristina's Court, Family Guy, The Bernie Mac Show, Century Premiere, Boston Legal, Texas Justice, Still Standing, and ...
Los Angeles Intellectual Property Trademark Attorney Blog - http://www.iptrademarkattorney.com/
27 May, 2008 1:51 am by Milord A. Keshishian
Glendale, CA - Copyright attorneys representing Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation and Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc. filed a copyright infringement lawsuit at the Federal District Court in Los Angeles over alleged infringing sales of each company's movies. The complaint itemizes each ... of its claims be paid by defendant pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 505. The case is titled Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Cox, CV08-03151 SJO (C.D. Cal. 2008).
Los Angeles Intellectual Property Trademark Attorney Blog - http://www.iptrademarkattorney.com/
20 May, 2007 9:00 pm
DMCA Safe Harbor Provisions: Fox wants Borat banished from blog; From: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation To: Google, Inc. [Blogger] Date: 2007-03-01
Chilling Effects Clearinghouse Notices - http://www.chillingeffects.org
26 Oct 11:31 am by Terese Arenth
... games. In transferring the disputed domain name to Complainant, the Panel held that the addition of the term "live" is insufficient to distinguish it from relevant FOX SPORTS marks. There was no indication of any right or legitimate interest that Respondent may have in the domain and, ... of or authorized by Complainant, falling squarely within the terms of paragraph 4(b)(iv) of the Policy. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation v. Domains by Proxy, Inc./Samina Rahman, WIPO Case No. D2009-1121
Domain Name Shame - http://domainnameshame.typepad.com/domain_name_shame/
27 Jul, 2007 3:41 am by Bill Gratsch
The Simpsons Movie hits theaters this week and this headline from the blawgosphere caught my eye: Film Company Wins thesimpsonsmovie.com From Cybersquatter, Doh!. Intellectual Property Watch has posted a detailed account of the ... ; and that the name has actually been registered and is being used in bad faith. The decision, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation v. KeithMalley.com, also apparently included in its findings that the "Thesimpsonsmovie.com" is confusingly similar to Fox's trademarked " ...
Blawg - http://blog.blawg.com
17 Mar 5:45 am by admin
... a part of the "popular lore" surrounding the Walt Disney persona. Satire v. Parody: Fox sought to justify its use as parody in two ways: 1) as a comment on the "saccharine sweet," " ... , just like wishing upon a star. Of particular note, Judge Batts absolved Fox of the need to show that the public equated "When You Wish Upon a Star" with Disney or that the public ... lofty, magical, or pure associations. Documents: Bourne Co. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation et al, 07 cv 08580 DAB (March 16, ...
Ex©lusive Rights - http://www.exclusiverights.net
11 Jul 5:44 pm
... Award in 2004, nominated by the College of Science. Mr. Rose was recently profiled in the American Physical Society newsletter, APS News, click here. Rose is Chambers rated. Previously employed as Senior Litigation & Antitrust Counsel and Assistant Secretary of Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, he has valuable insight into the needs and problems of in-house counsel.
The IP ADR Blog - http://www.ipadrblog.com/
18 Jan, 2008 3:01 am
... 02/07 closed 02/28/07 1:07-cv-00733 Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation v. Perkins filed 02/07/07 closed 10/16/07 ... 04/07 closed 10/24/07 1:07-cv-04957 Atlantic Recording Corporation et al vs. Napolitano filed 09/04/07 closed 10/15/07 ... 07 1:07-cv-05180 American Medical Association v. Practice Management Information Corporation filed 09/13/07 closed 09/27/07 1:07-cv-05529 ... filed 11/29/07 1:07-cv-06752 Compliance Software Solutions, Corporation v. Moda Technology Partners, Inc. et al filed 11/30/07 1 ...
Chicago IP Litigation Blog - http://www.chicagoiplitigation.com/
2 Jul, 2007 7:03 am
Back in March, I did a post about a suit filed by Carol Burnett over Fox's evocation of her "Charwoman" character on the TV show "Family Guy." The wheels of justice have ... for failure to state a claim on fair use grounds, Burnett v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, 2007 WL 1662343 (C.D. Cal. June 4, ... 's general fascination with celebrity and pop culture. On or about April 23, 2006, Fox aired an episode of "Family Guy" entitled "Peterotica." Near the beginning of the episode, the Griffin ...
The Patry Copyright Blog - http://williampatry.blogspot.com/index.html
20 Nov, 2008 11:08 am by Ray Beckerman
... of the MPAA has filed a lawsuit against a small Australian ISP, perhaps as a warm-up for a war -- by Big Music and Big Film -- against ISP's in general. The larger Australian film studios have ganged ... Roadshow, Universal Pictures, Warner Bros Entertainment, Paramount Pictures, Sony Pictures Entertainment, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Disney Enterprises, Inc. and the Seven Network (free to air tv channel). [www.afact.org.au] It is rumored that they went after a small ISP and would not ...
Recording Industry vs The People - http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/index.html
14 Sep, 2008 3:10 am
... refined in decisions such as the Ian Thorpe Case (Torpedoes Sportswear Pty Limited v Thorpedo Enterprises Pty Limited & Anor [2003] FCA 901, the Duff Beer Case, (Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation And Another v South Australian Brewing Co Ltd and Another (1996) 34 IPR 225), and the Crocodile Dundee Case (Re Pacific Dunlop Limited v Paul Hogan; Rimfire Films Limited and Burns Philp Trustee Company Limited [1989] FCA 185; 23 FCR 553 (25 May 1989 ...
Australian Trade Marks Law Blog - http://www.australiantrademarkslawblog.com/
19 Mar, 2007 11:34 pm by Mark Reichel
Last Thursday, Carol Burnett filed a lawsuit against the Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation for alleged copyright infringement relating to her likeness in a "Family Guy" episode. In the suit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in Los Angeles, Burnett alleges violations of her exclusive rights to her name and likeness regarding the depiction of her known cleaning-woman ...
Daily Dose of IP - http://dailydoseofip.blogspot.com
16 Jul, 2007 7:35 am by Alan J. Berteau
by James R. Chastain, Jr. On April 23, 2006, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation aired an episode of "Family Guy" entitled "Peterotica." In this episode, Peter Griffin, who was an Archie Bunker-like character, enters a porn shop with his friends and comments that the porn shop is cleaner than he expected. One of Peter's friends explains that Carol Burnett works part-time as a janitor. At this point, an animated character ...
Louisiana Law Blog - http://www.louisianalawblog.com/
10 Aug 10:13 am by Tom W. Bell
... who wants to free Willie, however, the Supreme Court has cut through that Gordian knot of liability. The Supreme Court held in Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation that, once a work has fallen into the public domain, its former copyright holder cannot use federal unfair competition law to demand credit from those who reuse the work. Still more broadly, the Court flatly excluded copyrighted works from the ...
Agoraphilia - http://agoraphilia.blogspot.com/
6 Aug 4:00 am by Doug Cornelius
... liability can "can only stem from the actions of so-called 'managerial' employees." That contention seems at odds with United States v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 882 F.2d 656, 660 (2d Cir.1989) In the Second Circuit, "[i]t is settled law that a corporation may be held criminally responsible for [criminal] violations committed by its employees or agents acting within the scope of their authority." United States v. ...
Compliance Building - http://www.compliancebuilding.com
18 Jul, 2008 1:50 pm
In Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23, 31 (2003), Justice Scalia phrased the question to be decided this way: [A]s it comes to us, the gravamen of respondents' ... 2008) No. 08 Civ. 4320(SAS). The facts are a bit spare, perhaps because of the court's sensitivity to the pornographic of the films. As related by the court: Plaintiff LBB Corporation is a California corporation that produces and distributes pornographic films that are marketed toward niche audiences. Pursuant ...
The Patry Copyright Blog - http://williampatry.blogspot.com/index.html
11 May, 2007 6:25 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
... the customer's set-top (or cable-box). By contrast, Cablevision's proposed RS-DVR system would store selections remotely in computer servers kept at the company's facilities. In Twentieth Century Fox Film Company, et al v. Cablevision, the plaintiffs* filed suit in U.S. ... that? -------------------------- *The list of plaintiffs in this consolidated case reads like a TV Guide, and includes: Fox, the Cartoon Network, CNN, TBS, Turner Classic Movies, TNT, Disney, CBS, and NBC. By ...
Real Estate Law Blog - http://www.nyrealestatelawblog.com/
28 Mar, 2008 6:00 am
... Rules: (Class 46), No strike out for Nokia: InterDigital Technology Corporation v Nokia Corporation & Anor: (IPKat) United States US General ACTA ... Copyright Blog), Has Congress backdoored in 'attempted copyright infringement' as a crime?: (Techdirt), Film Maker and PK submit testimony on orphan works: (Public Knowledge), Cotchkie ... Depot dismissed for inequitable conduct: (IP Law360), Oakley - Oakley sues Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp and Marvel Characters Inc for infringement of design patent ...
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/blog
3 Feb, 2008 4:40 pm by Michael Atkins
... .) Following the jury's verdict, Molten moved for judgment as a matter of law on the ground that Baden's false advertising claim as presented to the jury should be vacated because the claim is barred by the Supreme Court's decision in Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003). On Jan. 28, Judge Marsha Pechman denied the motion. Explaining the decision, the court stated: "Dastar held ...
Seattle Trademark Lawyer - http://seattletrademarklawyer.com/blog/
        Next >
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck