Search for: "UGS Corp"
Results 1 - 9 of 9
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
2 Nov, 2007 10:30 am
... with a couple of additional observations and facts on these cases. First of all, on the transfer in Weinstein v. UGS Corp: as Dennis notes, this was not a patent case - it was a negligence case against a corporation (albeit headquartered in Texas) ... known to have personal
knowledge of the accident and related facts are located in Michigan. There are roughly twelve UGS employees who gave interviews to the
authorities during the criminal investigation of Mr. Wellinger and those witnesses reside in ...
28 Mar, 2008 6:00 am
... summary judgment of noninfringement, upheld on appeal in patent case Computer Docking Station Corp v Dell, Gateway and Toshiba: (Patent
Prospector), (IP Updates), (IPBiz ... Cies Bisker LLC launches patent infringement suit against 3M, News Corp and others over advertisements
printed on floors: (IP Law360), Nilssen - Oke ... Prospector), Tooling Systems International - CAFC dismisses TSI's allegations against UGS
Corp regarding actions taken in Poland to enforce software licences, for lack of jurisdiction ...
30 Oct 12:19 am
... is liable for three deaths caused by a company employee who was driving drunk. Thomas Wellinger, who had been sent from his office at UGS
Corp. to seek medical attention, drove his vehicle at 70 mph into a car driven by Judith Weinstein, killing her and ... sons, ages 9 and 12.
Her husband, Gary Weinstein of Farmington Hills, Mich., claims in a wrongful-death suit that USG Corp. had a duty not to let Wellinger leave
the premises. The case poses the issue of whether a company can be found liable for ...
29 Oct, 2007 8:43 am
Weinstein v. UGS Corp., 2007 WL 3118363(E.D.Tex. Oct 22, 2007) (NO. CIV. A. 207CV-173 TJ) Judge: T.
John Ward Holding: Motion to Transfer Venue GRANTED USGS is a company with its principal place of business in Texas. One day one of its employees left its offices in Michigan and struck
and killed two people while driving under the influence of alcohol. He was convicted of second degree murder, and is currently an inmate in a Michigan prison. Judge Ward granted
Defendant's motion ...
2 Nov, 2007 5:04 am
Although still the most popular district court for new patent cases. The magnetism of the Eastern District of Texas may be beginning to wane. Two recent cases: Weinstein v.
UGS Corp: This is not a patent case - however it may be indicative of the court's new favorite word:
Transfer. Here, the court transferred a civil case back to Michigan were the best locus of facts and witnesses could be found. TGIP v. AT: ...
21 Oct 2:33 pm
OCTOBER 21, 2009 - A trial is scheduled to begin for a wrongful death lawsuit stemming from a crash on May 3, 2005, that killed Judith Weinstein and her two sons, ages 9 and 12. Thomas
Wellinger, an employee of UGS Corp., had been sent to seek medical attention when he drove his car
into Weinstein's vehicle at 70 mph, killing her and her sons. Weinstein's husband claims in the suit that Wellinger's employer had a ...
15 Feb, 2007 12:25 am
... 2, 518 S.E.2d 259, 261 n.7 (S.C. 1999); Rodriguez v. Suzuki Motor Corp., 996 S.W.2d 47, 63 (Mo. 1999); Marsh v. Wenzel, 732 So. 2d 985, ...
preserved state law practice, whatever that practice might be. See E.E.O.C. v. Boston Mkt. Corp., 2004 WL 3327264, at *5 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 16,
2004) (HIPAA "does not ... state court rule, statute or case law on ex parte interviews." Smith v. American Home Products Corp., 855 A.2d 608,
622 (N.J. Super. 2003). "HIPAA, by its own terms, does not exclusively dominate the ...
20 Jun, 2007 8:40 am
Jim Harlan, Patent Counsel at Siemens Automation and Drives, UGS PLM Software (and former Blawger Bowl III competitor), has gone wild and
started a new patent blog, Patents Gone Wild. The site ... a patent abroad, say the US, must first obtain a foreign filing license from the Indian Government. Jim asks: What does that
mean for a US Corp that utilizes developers in India, where those developers are potentially inventors? Does this include Provisional
Applications? In the US, the inventors are the ...
24 Mar 9:21 am
Kaplan v. First Hartford Corp., --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2009 WL 737681 (D. Me. March 20, 2009) [Read Opinion] This opinion states the findings of
fact and conclusions of law of the United States District Court of the District of Maine regarding the valuation issues in a shareholder oppression case, the liability portion of which
was analyzed here earlier. [See Case Analysis] Having determined that the minority shareholder had been oppressed and that buy-out was the appropriate remedy, the court ...
Search on: Blawgs.FM | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blog Search | Technorati | Google | MSN | Yahoo!