Search for: "Utstarcom, Inc.,"
Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
1 May 3:39 am
UTStarcom, Inc. v. Starent Networks, Corp., No. 07 C 2582, Slip Op. (N.D. Ill. Jan. 22, 2009) (Bobrick, Ret. J. & ... sixth set of responses, Starent agreed that the
answers were sufficient. Starent, however, requested dismissal of the claim based upon UTStarcom's repeated failure to provide a substantive answer. ... provided substantive
answers and because Starent had not been prejudiced by the delay. UTStarcom even suggested other remedies like exclusion of late produced evidence. The Special Master ...
11 May 3:52 am
UTStarcom, Inc. v. Starent Networks, Corp., No. 07 C 2582, Slip Op. (N.D. Ill. Apr. 13, 2009) (Bobrick, Ret. J. ... 's request to dismiss plaintiff's trade secret
misappropriation claim as a sanction for UTStarcom's incomplete responses, but awarded attorneys fees. Of particular interest, the Special ... not inappropriate and that block
billed entries could be recovered. Additionally, based in part on UTStarcom's failure to provide its rates as part of a reasonableness analysis, the Special Master held ...
15 Jan, 2008 3:06 am
... . Reliable Controls Corporation filed 05/07/07 1:07-cv-02582 Utstarcom Inc v. Starent Networks Corp et al filed 05/08/07 ... 1:07-cv-04512 Technology Development and
Licensing, LLC v. Motorola, Inc filed 08/09/07 1:07-cv-04552 McKlein Company LLC ... -cv-04709 International Securities Exchange , LLC v. Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Inc. filed 08/20/07 1:07-cv-04729 Niro, Scavone, ... 1:07-cv-06293 Nalco Company v. Enviro Tech Chemical Services, Inc. filed 11/06/07 1:07-cv-06297 Connetics Corporation
et ...
23 Dec, 2008 7:00 pm
... and adopted by the board of directors at five: CV Therapeutics, Inc.; KEMET Corporation; MGIC Investment Corp.; UTStarcom, Inc.; and BearingPoint, Inc. A
proposal that sought the adoption of a policy to allow shareholders an advisory vote to ratify the compensation of named executive officers was adopted by the Board of Directors of
Blockbuster Inc. It was withdrawn at Par Pharmaceuticals based on the Board of Directors' commitment to adopt the policy in 2009. Social and ...
9 Jan 7:00 am
... avoid means-plus-function treatment: Welker Bearing Co v Phd, Inc (Anticipate This!) CAFC: Effects of not informing court about changes in law in midst of litigation: ...
Illinois: Allegations that specific references were withheld sufficient for inequitable conduct claim: UTStarcom, Inc v Starent Networks, Corp (Chicago Intellectual
Property Law Blog) ... trade dress claims trigger insurer's duty to defend: Australia Unlimited, Inc v Hartford Casualty Ins. Co (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) District Court N ...
1 May 11:00 am
... : Alleged harm to plaintiff in Illinois creates specific jurisdiction in trade secrets case UTStarcom, Inc v Starent Networks, Corp (Chicago Intellectual Property Law
Blog) US ... Is everything obvious?: In re Kubin and KSR International Co v Teleflex Inc (Patent Docs) US Patents - Decisions CAFC: USPTO, Tafas & GSK request ... (TTABlog)
TTAB finds RUSSKAYA for Vodka abandoned, cancels registration: AV Brands, Inc v Spirits International, BV (not precedential) (TTABlog) (Property, intangible) TTAB: ...
30 Aug, 2007 4:03 am
UTStarcom, Inc. v. Starent Networks, Corp., No. 07 C 2582, Min. Order (N.D. Ill. Aug. 16, 2007) (Lindberg, J.). Judge Lindberg denied defendants' motion to dismiss
plaintiff's state law claims and its claim seeking assignment of defendants' patents to plaintiffs. The Court held that the claim seeking assignment of defendants patents to plaintiff
was an invalidity contention. Plaintiff claimed that it had invented defendants' patented inventions before defendants. While plaintiff did ...
7 Sep, 2007 2:34 am
A former executive and co-founder of telecommunications company UTStarcom Inc. settled an SEC civil complaint alleging he and his wife sold shares of the company shortly
before it planned to announce that it would not meet its earnings target for...
6 Jan 2:25 am
UTStarcom, Inc. v. Starent Networks, Corp., No. 07 C 2582 Slip Op. (N.D. Ill. Dec. 5, 2008) (Lindberg, Sen. J.). Judge Lindberg granted in part plaintiff's motion to
dismiss certain of defendant Starent's counterclaims. Starent's allegations that specific patentee withheld specific references from the Patent Office were sufficient to meet the Rule
9(b) heightened pleading standards for inequitable conduct. But the Court dismissed Starent's tortious interference counterclaim to the ...
27 Apr 3:05 am
UTStarcom, Inc. v. Starent Networks, Corp., No. 07 C 2582, Slip Op. (N.D. Ill. Mar. 25, 2009) (Lindberg, Sen. J.). Judge Lindberg denied the individual defendant's Fed. R.
Civ P. 12(b)(2) motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The individual defendant's four business trips to Illinois and prior work in California for plaintiff did not create
general jurisdiction. But the Court did have specific jurisdiction over the individual defendant. Individual defendant was ...
3 Apr 7:23 pm
... in patent pool: Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. v. Cinram International Inc (Property, intangible) USPTO rules for Smith & Nephew in suture patent fight ... )
Toshiba - University of Mexico sues Toshiba over chip patents (Law360) UTStarcom - Starent trims UTStarcom contract claims, now facing most patent infringement allegations
( ... N D Illinois: No dismissal on pleadings for factual trademark defences: DeVry Inc v University of Medicine & Health Sciences - St Kitts (Chicago Intellectual ...
29 Oct, 2007 1:08 am
... in the $70 million to $90 million range in the complex lawsuit Ginsburg v. Philadelphia Stock Exchange Inc. was approved by Delaware's Court of Chancery last week. In the
action, a group of shareholders in the exchange claimed that members ... court results in a decision -- one that will disappoint at least one of the parties in the case. Commentator
Bashman examines the process and the pitfalls. UTStarcom's Crash Shows Pitfalls of Doing Business in China The Recorder UTStarcom went public in 2000, ...
1 Nov, 2008 3:12 am
... CTM descriptive: Powerserve Personalservice v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market - Manpower Inc (Class 46) MARQUES Position Paper on Proposed Changes to Locarno
Classification System ... non-practising entity be a Lanham Actcompetitor?: Foboha GMBH v Gram Technology, Inc (Rebecca Tushnet's 43(B)log) District Court judge holds ...
infringement of heart implant device patent (Law360) QPSX Devlopments 5 - QPSX, UTStarcom settle digital network patent suit (Law360) Randi Black - Plaintiff, Randi ...
8 May 10:00 am
... increase (Afro-IP) Europe ECJ rejects SAFETY 1ST mark: Dorel Juvenile, Inc v OHIM (Class 46) ECJ: PAGO - is Austria 'substantial'?: PAGO International GmbH v ... Illinois
barely denies motion to dismiss for delayed interrogatory answers in trade secrets case: UTStarcom v Starent Networks (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) US Copyright 'This
... TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of WAVE for recreational trailers: In re Thor Tech, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB: No famous marks doctrine: Bayer Consumer Care v Belmora ...
Search on: Blawgs.FM | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blog Search | Technorati | Google | MSN | Yahoo!