Search for: "Warner Lambert Company"
Results 1 - 20 of 88
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
12 Dec, 2007 2:33 pm
... Id. at 33. Because, as previously mentioned, there is no adverse FDA fraud finding in this case, Warner-Lambert was in the enviable position of offering the two concurring Justices in Buckman (Stevens and Thomas) their possible ... where FDA itself is entirely
satisfied with the manufacturers' candor. Inevitably, the proliferation of cases linking liability to the adequacy of companies' disclosures to FDA will upset the somewhat
delicate balance of statutory objectives FDA has struck in deterring ...
23 Oct, 2007 6:00 am
... (2006), cert. granted sub. nom Warner-Lambert v. Kent, 2007 WL 1420397 (Sept. 27, 2007). If a
plaintiff brings a product liability claim against a drug company, the law of the plaintiff's home state typically governs that lawsuit. Thus,
if you live in Michigan and think ... Pfizer, you sue in New York and take advantage of Desiano. If you're suing a drug company headquartered
in California, you file your lawsuit in federal court in California. You don't have Desiano, a ...
3 Sep 6:00 am
... discovered by a third party or by the general public." In Nova Chemicals, inc. v. Sekisui Plastics, Inc., a company agreed to license
proprietary technology to produce a Styrofoam product. The propreitary technology was protected by patent and trade ... that NOVA chemicals could market products that incorporated the
disclosed trade secret in Asia. In both Aronson and Warner-Lambert, the courts focused on aspects of
the agreements that evinced an intent to create ongoing obligations after the life of ...
27 Sep, 2007 11:38 am
... defendants] won in 2001, when the Supreme Court said patients can't sue companies for defrauding the U.S. Food and Drug Administration during the approval process ... 1181991
(Texas presumption exception). This was the state of play when the Court of Appeals in Desiano v. Warner-Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85, (2d Cir. 2006 ... take the Buckman Court at its word that, however much a state might regulate a federally regulated
company's interactions with the public, no state can presume to regulate how such ...
25 Feb, 2008 11:03 am
... guest post was prepared by Ted Frank, who blogs regularly at Point of Law, and who attended the oral argument this morning in Warner-Lambert v. Kent. This report is also being posted at that site. Needless to say, this report represents only
Ted's work. ... Ginsburg's "invigorated defense" argument: the Michigan statute simply holds that approval is reliable evidence of duty. If a company lied to or bribed the FDA, then approval is no longer reliable. The statute doesn't police the FDA enforcement, ...
13 Mar, 2008 8:00 am
... s Warner-Lambert v. Kent decision, the first take-away is precisely that: As far as Michigan's
1995 drug industry immunity law, which shields pharmaceutical companies ... -prize winning reporter, David Willman, and a number of informants - both inside the company and at F.D.A.. Were it not for Willman and his informants, much of ... So we are left where we began. Michigan's law shielding drug companies
from liability remains solidly in place. The Kent result was a fortunate fluke for a relative handful ...
14 Feb 9:24 am
... antiseptic surgery. Pfizer acquired Warner-Lambert to get Lipitor, but as wikipedia points out:
[Listerine] is currently manufactured and distributed by Johnson and Johnson since that company's acquisition of Pfizer's consumer healthcare
division in late December of 2006. Pfizer closed down the Warner-Lambert Ann Arbor research facility.
One of the developers of Lipitor was terminated. Also on Jeopardy ...
14 Oct, 2007 7:57 am
... been asked two questions repeatedly since the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Warner-Lambert
v. Kent. We're answering both of them publicly today. ... California law will govern that lawsuit. That result holds true even if the drug company is headquartered in -- or headquartered and incorporated in -- New Jersey. The choice of law rules for product ... Jersey law would govern all claims
brought against New Jersey companies, this choice-of-law headache would evaporate. New Jersey law would govern ...
4 Mar, 2008 2:34 pm
... On March 3, 2008 the U.S. Supreme Court issued its ruling in the Warner-Lambert v. Kent case and,
in so doing, declined the invitation of pharmaceutical companies -- and the Bush administration -- to prohibit drug injury lawsuits from being filed by ... how the FDA's
position, if ultimately adopted by the Supreme Court, would effectively eliminate a significant incentive for the drug company to ensure that
its drug labels reflect accurate and up-to-date safety information, i.e., the possibility of ...
27 Sep, 2007 6:30 am
... regulation of pharmaceuticals pre-empts state law. The case involves a product liability lawsuit against Pfizer's Warner-Lambert unit. A group of Michigan plaintiffs led by Kimberly Kent in April 2000 sued Warner-Lambert Co. over ... because other states were also involved. An exception in Michigan's law that allowed the suits to proceed if a pharmaceutical
company misrepresents information presented to the FDA was pre-empted by federal laws governing the regulation of pharmaceuticals, the district
...
26 Mar, 2008 12:52 pm
... CEO on fraud charges related to allegedly marketing off-label uses of a drug, an unrelated class action suit has been filed in the state of Pennyslvania against Pfizer and
Warner-Lambert alleging neglience and negligent and intentional misrepresentation for allegedly
conducting a marketing campaign ... policy questions about off-label uses of medications and the promotion of such uses. Have drug companies and the medical community been too
quick to embrace off-label uses of drugs ...
5 Mar, 2008 6:55 am
... vote, with Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. not participating, will permit a lawsuit to proceed against the Warner-Lambert Company, the maker of a diabetes drug, Rezulin. The plaintiffs are 27 diabetes patients from Michigan who
suffered liver damage while ... automatically affirms the lower court's judgment. In this case, the federal appeals court in New York had rejected the company's argument that the reasoning of a seven-year-old Supreme Court precedent barred individual damage suits that are ...
15 Aug, 2006 7:45 am
... 1000 documents drawn primarily from United States ex. rel. David Franklin vs. Parke-Davis, Division of Warner-Lambert Company (now owned by Pfizer, Inc). The litigation concerned the marketing of Neurontin (gabapentin). (See
About the Project for ... , Merck & Co. and correspondence with outside physicians and organizations, such as medical education and communications companies and advertising
firms. Also included are regulatory and legal documents, court filings and depositions. The archive ...
25 Jul, 2007 7:47 am
... in the multi-jurisdiction Lipitor litigation between Pfizer and Ranbaxy. The court came down in favour of Pfizer (or more precisely, in favour of Warner-Lambert Company, the Irish patentee). David writes: "The
proceedings concerned Ranbaxy's application before Mr Justice Clarke for a declaration of non-infringement of Warner-Lambert's patent. There was no challenge in these proceedings to the validity of the patent. Apart from its inherent interest in ...
30 May, 2008 9:09 am
... product; and affirms enatiomer patent invalid on false suggestion grounds: Ranbaxy Australia Pty Ltd v Warner-Lambert Company LLC: (GenericsWeb), (IPRoo), (IP Law360), Lipitor (Atorvastatin) - Canada: Court of Appeal upholds
previous decision that it ... overrules Federal Patent Court ruling of patent invalidity and grants Eli Lilly preliminary injunction against generic companies: (IPEG), Africa
Inventions gathering dust in Africa: (Innovationpartners), Ghana, Iran to cooperate in R&D, tech ...
1 Apr, 2007 7:39 am
... , R.S., Silverman, R.B., 1989. A convenient synthesis of 3-alkyl-4-aminobutanoic acids. Synthesis 953-955. The '175 patent is assigned in part to Warner-Lambert Company and makes no mention of government support. See
also http://www.freshpatents.com/Pregabalin-composition-dt20050804ptan20050171203.php *** Prior to the 175 patent, Andruszkiewicz was a named inventor on US 4,923,965. In a different
patent, US 5,684,189, ...
7 Mar, 2008 1:27 am
... two of its passengers." Boulware v. United States "A distributee accused of criminal tax evasion may claim return-of-capital treatment without producing evidence that, when the
distribution occurred, either he or the corporation intended a return of capital." Warner-Lambert
Company v. LEP Profit International Inc., etc. "The limited-liability provision of the Warsaw Convention was not applicable to a carrier who
...
9 Nov 1:01 am
... fig leaf allows a parent company to continue to participate in government programs even after its subsidiary has pleaded guilty. Pfizer
maintains its good standing with such agencies because its subsidiaries, Warner-Lambert and P&U,
... groups. Back in Court In January 2009, Lilly was back in federal court. Prosecutors in Philadelphia accused the company of earning hundreds
of millions of dollars by illegally promoting its schizophrenia drug Zyprexa for the unapproved treatment of dementia from ...
5 Aug 9:33 am
... U.S. Justice Department in 2004. Franklin, who worked at Warner Lambert for four months in 1995
before resigning over the company's off-label marketing practices, received about ... to transform Neurontin into a "blockbuster" medicine
generating $1 billion in annual sales. The company estimated that selling it solely as an epilepsy drug would generate only about $50 million
... Lambert in August 2007, more than three years after Bulger's husband and 4-year-old daughter found her body in their basement. ...
29 Nov, 2007 7:45 am
... preempted because it raises no conflict. Kent br. at 13 n.2. Basically the government agrees with the defendant, Warner-Lambert (manufacturer of the withdrawn diabetes drug Rezulin), that these fraud on the FDA claims masquerading as elements of "traditional ... the
manufacturer has, in fact, misrepresented or withheld information that the Agency really wanted and needed. Basically, the company (or those
responsible) can go to jail or be fined lots of money, and the product can be removed from the ...
Search on: Blawgs.FM | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blog Search | Technorati | Google | MSN | Yahoo!