Search for: "j2 Global Communications Inc v. Protus IP Solutions Inc"
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe:  20 results  |  100 results
16 Jan 7:00 am
... question can reduce expense and improve business outcome of patent litigation (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Confessions of a 'recovering patent attorney' and why I have ... message for the Associate Solicitor (Hal Wegner) When it comes to patent marking, timing is everything (IP Frontline) 'The Likely Adverse Effects of an Apportionment-Centric System of Patent Damages' study ... case denied citing In re VW II: J2 Global Communications, Inc v Protus IP Solutions, Inc (EDTexweblog.com) District Court S D New ...
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/blog
24 Feb 12:51 pm by Michael C. Smith
j2 Global Communications Inc v. Protus IP Solutions Inc (6-08-cv-00211) (E.D. Tex. Feb. 20, 2009) Judge: John Love Well, it may ... of In re TS Tech USA Corp., 551 F.3d 1315 (Fed. Cir. 2008). So j2 went up on blocks in the judge's front yard (proverbially speaking) for an inspection to see if it had ... all of the parties and witnesses are localized in one general geographic area. Compare Network-1 Sec. Solutions, Inc., 433 F. Supp. 2d at 800 (denying transfer where witnesses were located all over the ...
Eastern District of Texas Federal Court Practice - http://mcsmith.blogs.com/eastern_district_of_texas/
14 Jan 9:18 am by Michael C. Smith
J2 Global Communications, Inc. v. Protus IP Solutions, Inc., 2008 WL 5378010(E.D.Tex. Dec 23, 2008) (NO. CIV.A. 6:08- ... inconsistent claim constructions. "Judge Pregerson has not construed any of the patents in the California j2 cases," he observed, thus unlike the other cases "the Court cannot conclude ... ordering the stay, there is no indication that Judge Pregerson had substantial involvement with the j2 California cases either prior to or after the implementation of the stay. Judge Pregerson has ...
Eastern District of Texas Federal Court Practice - http://mcsmith.blogs.com/eastern_district_of_texas/
28 Dec, 2008 11:56 pm by The Docket Navigator
... has routinely rejected this sort of argument in patent cases. When a company sells allegedly infringing products, or offers allegedly infringing services, nationwide, 'no specific locality has a dominant interest in resolving the issue of [patent infringement].' " j2 Global Communications Inc v. Protus IP Solutions Inc., 6-08-cv-00211 (TXED December 23, 2008, Memorandum Opinion & Order)
Docket Report Patent Infringement Blog - http://docketreport.blogspot.com/
         
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck