Search for: ""Barker v. Wingo" OR "407 U.S. 514""
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2009, 1:21 pm
Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972), speedy trial analysis. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 5:28 am
Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972) (discussing constitutional speedy trial right) factors before dismissal. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 3:45 pm
Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 515 (1972). [read post]
6 May 2010, 2:02 pm
Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972) and Doggett v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 9:55 am
WINGO, 407 U.s. 514 (1972) AND DOGGETT v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:52 pm
Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972), using four factors to determine whether there was a violation of Velazquez’s right to a speedy trial: (1) the length of the delay before the trial, (2) the reason for the delay, including a consideration of whether the government was to blame, (3) the extent to which the defendant asserted his right to a speedy trial and (4) the amount of prejudice suffered by the defendant. [read post]
21 May 2009, 10:45 pm
Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 530 (1972), the Indictment is not properly dismissed. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:08 am
Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 530 (1972). [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 6:00 pm
Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 530 (1972). [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 2:01 am
Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972) or the three-part due process analysis set forth in Mathews v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 2:03 pm
In Peter's Excellent Motion to Dismiss he argued that Barker v Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972) was controlling and that the following factors must be considered:1. length of delay - nearly four years, any time over one year between indictment and arrest is presumptively prejudicial2. reason for the delay - here government negligence to move the case forward and even gained a tactical advantage because the Defendant no longer had possible… [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 9:12 pm
Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972). [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 12:18 pm
Wingo, 407 U.s. 514, 33 L.Ed.2d 101, 92 S.Ct. 2182 (1972). [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:09 pm
Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 530 (1972). [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 9:06 am
Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972): (1) length of delay; (2) reason for delay; (3) extent defendant asserted his right to a speedy trial; and, (4) prejudice to defendant caused by the delay. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:22 am
Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972). [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 7:12 am
Wingo (407 U.S. 514, 530 (1972)) for Sixth Amendment speedy trial violations (the majority found that a delay of only 71 days did not trigger the full analysis). [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 7:57 am
Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972) constitutional speedy trial factors anew and determined that Battis's constitutional speedy trial rights had been violated. [read post]
25 May 2007, 11:31 pm
Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972). [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 7:34 am
Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972) as if the Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial and the Art. 11 right to a speedy trial is the same right. [read post]
