Search for: ""Bazemore v. Friday" OR "478 U.S. 385""
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2007, 8:28 am
Friday, 478 U.S. 385, 106 S.Ct. 3000, 92 L.Ed.2d 315 (1986) (per curiam), which involved a racially discriminatory pay system. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 7:20 am
” 478 U.S. 385, 400 n.10 (1986). [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 12:34 pm
Friday, 478 U.S. 385, 400 (1986), plaintiffs sued as a class for employment discrimination, and sought to show the discrimination through the use of a regression analysis. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 6:36 pm
" 478 U.S. 385, 395-96 (1986) (Brennan, J., concurring). [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 5:31 pm
Friday, 478 U.S. 385 (1986), the defendant criticized the plaintiffs’ regression on grounds that it omitted variables for major factors in any fair, sensible model of salary. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 6:43 am
In Karlo v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm
Despite the inappropriateness of considering the Bazemore precedent after the Court decided Daubert, many lower court decisions have treated Bazemore as dispositive of reliability challenges to regression analyses, without any meaningful discussion.11 In the last several years, however, the appellate courts have awakened on occasion to their responsibilities to ensure that opinions of statistical expert witnesses, based upon regression analyses, are evaluated through the lens of… [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
Friday, 478 U.S. 385, 400 (1986) (“Normally, failure to include variables will affect the analysis’ probativeness, not its admissibility.). 12 Id. at 1325. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
Joiner, 522 U.S. 136, 145-46 (1997) (holding that an expert witness’s reliance on a study was misplaced when the subjects of the study “had been exposed to numerous potential carcinogens”) First Circuit Bricklayers & Trowel Trades Internat’l Pension Fund v. [read post]
