Search for: ""Branzburg v. Hayes" OR "408 U.S. 665"" Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2008, 7:45 am
Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 (1972), judicial protection of journalists' confidential sources has... [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 8:44 am
Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 (1972), which the majority says compels its decision, did not, as the majority believes, straightforwardly reject the existence of at least a qualified privilege to protect sources. [read post]
7 May 2010, 11:39 am by Eugene Volokh
Hayes, 408 U.S. 665, 704 (1972) (quotations and citations omitted). [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:14 pm by PaulKostro
Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 (1972), for states to fashion their own standards that meet or exceed First Amendment limits. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 1:40 am by INFORRM
In Branzburg v Hayes (1972) 408 U.S. 665 the US Supreme Court rejected a claim for a journalistic privilege in testimony before Grand Juries, holding that “reporters, like other citizens [must] respond to relevant questions put to them”. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 3:15 pm
Hayes, 408 U.S. 665, 684 (1972), channel 7 does not argue that it should be granted official access to the autopsy records; rather, it seeks to broadcast information already in its possession. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 (1972), establishes that there is a “reporter’s privilege” under the First Amendment. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 9:35 am by Schachtman
Back in 2001, in the aftermath of the silicone gel breast implant litigation, I participated in a Federal Judicial Center (FJC) television production of “Science in the Courtroom, program 6” (2001). [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 1:00 pm by Ted Folkman
Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 (1972), to the Scooter Libby/Judith Miller case, are quite hostile to the idea of a privilege in the face of a grand jury subpoena, and as I noted in my response to Chris Bray’s thoughtful post, the policy of the common law is hostile to such a privilege: For more than three centuries it has now been recognized as a fundamental maxim that the public (in the words sanctioned by Lord Hardwicke) has a right to every man’s evidence. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 8:34 am by Eugene Volokh
Hayes, 408 U.S. 665, 690 (1972), or "a constitutional right of special access to information not available to the public generally. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:00 am by Paul Rosenzweig
 As the Court held in Fisher v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 11:04 am by Eugene Volokh
Hayes, 408 U.S. 665, 690 (1972), or "a constitutional right of special access to information not available to the public generally. [read post]