Search for: ""Christiansburg Garment Co. v. EEOC" OR "434 U.S. 412""
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2015, 8:00 am
EEOC (1978) 434 U.S. 412. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 1:10 pm
EEOC (1978) 434 U.S. 412 in connection with Title VII discrimination claims and later applied to claims brought under California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) as well. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 7:14 am
EEOC, 434 U.S. 412, 421 (1978). [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 7:10 am
Supreme Court’s holding in Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 7:31 pm
Peoplemark, Inc., the Court in Tricore applied the well-established standard from Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 2:28 pm
In relevant part, Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 2:28 pm
In relevant part, Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 8:58 pm
EEOC (1978) 434 U.S. 412, 418-419 (Christiansburg).) [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 6:32 am
Citing the longstanding case of Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 12:24 pm
The majority's opinion is not quite long enough to cite Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 9:05 pm
EEOC, 434 U.S. 412, 422 (1978)). [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 7:39 am
Citing the longstanding case of Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 10:28 am
The statute makes no distinction between the standard for prevailing plaintiffs versus prevailing defendants, but in Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 8:51 am
§ 216(b) (emphasis added); Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 3:00 pm
(quoting Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 11:04 am
In relevant part, Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 5:40 pm
EEOC, 434 U.S. 412, 422 (1978), and severely undermines the policy of Section 706(k) of Title VII. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 5:24 am
United States, 487 U.S. 250, 254 (1988); Thomas v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
However, an award of attorneys' fees to a prevailing defendant is appropriate in much more limited circumstances.In Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]