Search for: ""Christiansburg Garment Co. v. EEOC" OR "434 U.S. 412"" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2013, 1:10 pm by Epstein Becker Green
EEOC (1978) 434 U.S. 412 in connection with Title VII discrimination claims and later applied to claims brought under California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) as well. [read post]
8 May 2011, 7:31 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Peoplemark, Inc., the Court in Tricore applied the well-established standard from Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 12:24 pm by Richard Renner
The majority's opinion is not quite long enough to cite Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 9:05 pm
EEOC, 434 U.S. 412, 422 (1978)). [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 10:28 am by Mack Sperling
  The statute makes no distinction between the standard for prevailing plaintiffs versus prevailing defendants, but in Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 5:40 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
EEOC, 434 U.S. 412, 422 (1978), and severely undermines the policy of Section 706(k) of Title VII. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am by Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
However, an award of attorneys' fees to a prevailing defendant is appropriate in much more limited circumstances.In Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]