Search for: ""Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp." OR "539 U.S. 23"" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2012, 12:25 pm by Dennis Crouch
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003) and TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 3:39 am by R. David Donoghue
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23, 123 S.Ct. 2041 (2003), decision, the Court held that the defendants were correct in identifying themselves as the originator of their papers, even if plaintiff originated the Model underlying the papers. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 12:00 pm by Stacia Lay
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003), by preventing the Betty Boop character from ever entering the public domain. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 4:21 pm by tlcasagrande
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003), holding that the defendant’s knock offs amounted to “reverse passing off” under the Lanham Act. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 8:39 am by Evan Brown (@internetcases)
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003) to find that plaintiff’s Lanham Act claim failed. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 1:09 pm
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003), a claim for reverse passing off cannot be brought to prevent the copying of intellectual property. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 10:45 pm by Bruno Tarabichi
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., another case that both parties failed to cite, is also relevant. 539 U.S. 23, 123 S. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 5:37 am by Mavrick Law Firm
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003), described a false designation of origin claim as occurring “when a producer misrepresents his own goods or services as someone else’s. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 4:40 pm
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003).On Jan. 28, Judge Marsha Pechman denied the motion. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 11:49 am by Sheppard Mullin
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23, 32 (2003), in finding that an author may not use the Lanham Act to protect originality and creativity. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:29 pm by Tom Casagrande
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003)—another decision that neither party had cited or discussed. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 5:14 am by Dennis Crouch
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003). [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 3:00 pm
It also provides a potential end-run around the Supreme Court's decision in Dastar Corp. v Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003), which declined to extend Lanham Act protection to removal of the original production company's name when re-distributing a public domain television series. [read post]