Search for: ""Dickinson v. Zurko" OR "527 U.S. 150"" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2011, 9:42 pm by Patent Docs
Zurko, 527 U.S. 150 (1999), where the Supreme Court found that the Federal Circuit, like all... [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 5:30 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Zurko, 527 U.S. 150 (1999)[which was a 6-3 vote], the author noted that the court's opinion reads like alecture to an unruly classroom. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 8:44 am by Dennis Crouch
Zurko, 527 U.S. 150 (1999)—and this court’s own—In re Gartside, 203 F.3d 1305 (Fed. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:31 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Zurko, 527 U.S.150, 152 (1999) (holding that § 706 governs our reviews ofthe USPTO’s findings of fact and providing the frameworkfor this review). [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 12:13 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Zurko, 527 U.S. 150, 152, 165 (1999).Under the APA, we review the Board’s legal conclusionsde novo and its factual findings for substantial evidence.ACCO Brands Corp. v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:49 pm
[…] Just as the PTO’s expert knowledge is the foundation for the presumption of validity, in Dickinson v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 5:54 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Oklahoma, 503 U.S. 91, 113(1992) (citation omitted); see, e.g., Consolo v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 12:33 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Zurko, 527 U.S. 150, 162 (1999), that “[t]he APA requires meaningful review,” “not simply rubber-stamping agency factfinding. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:34 pm
Zurko, 527 U.S. 150, 152 (1999). [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 3:27 pm
Zurko, 527 U.S. 150, 154 (1999)). [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 2:16 pm by Gene Quinn
Zurko, 527 U.S. 150 (1999), the Federal Circuit must grant deference to the determinations of the Patent Office, as required by the Administrative Procedures Act. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 6:32 pm
Zurko, 527 U.S. 150, 155 (1999) (applying the APA to the PTO). [read post]