Search for: ""Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Broudo" OR "544 U.S. 336"" Results 1 - 20 of 43
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2009, 12:12 pm
Broudo, 544 U.S. 336, 342-48 (2005); and (2) applying an erroneous standard of proof in determining total loss for sentencing enhancement purposes. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 3:24 pm
The court also rebuffed PIMCO's "repeated, indeed obsessive, citations to the Supreme Court's decision in Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:05 am
Broudo, 544 U.S. 336 (2005)), not to a criminal securities fraud prosecution, making the distinction inapplicable. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 9:52 am by James Hamilton
For example, should the Commission provide a loss causation standard similar to the civil loss causation standard articulated by the Supreme Court in Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]