Search for: ""Ex parte Republic of Peru" OR "318 U.S. 578"" Results 1 - 1 of 1
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2020, 8:36 am by Marty Lederman
  The majority also cites a 1943 Supreme Court case—Ex parte Republic of Peru, 318 U.S. 578 (1943)—but that’s inapposite, too, as Judge Wilkins explains (dissent pp. 8-9 n.2):  The Court there decided that the petitioning party, the Republic of Peru, had a basis for immediate relief to remedy its own injury.Thus Judge Wilkins is right (p.8):  “The majority cites no cases in which a… [read post]